Forever 21 Company Cyber Security Posture
forever21.comForever 21 continues to be a fashion industry leader with a mission to make the latest trends accessible to all. F21 persists on staying ahead of innovation and providing styles and fit that our customers love. While reinventing for now and beyond, we’re seeking passionate and creative new family members to join us on this adventure! F21 continues to operate E-commerce and 450 locations across the U.S. along with maintaining a strong brand DNA with consumers and within the fashion industry. In February 2020, Forever 21 came under new ownership made up of Simon Property Group, Brookfield Property Partners, and Authentic Brands Group. Under this new ownership F21 has the financial strength and long term view that will prepare us for the future, while continuing to set the same high standards as it always has. Join our team and learn the inner sanctum of the global fashion industry, while we build the new Forever 21! Forever 21 is operated by SPARC Group LLC. About SPARC Group LLC SPARC Group LLC offers operational and strategic expertise including retail and e-commerce management, sourcing, design and technology for leading global brands. SPARC Group is a joint venture between Simon Property Group, a preeminent retail real estate company and Authentic Brands Group, a global leader in brand development. In addition to Forever 21, SPARC Group brands include Aéropostale, Brooks Brothers, Nautica, Eddie Bauer, and Lucky Brand. SPARC Group LLC is an equal opportunity employer, and is committed to maintaining a workplace free from prohibited employment conduct, including discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, domestic partner status, civil partnership, status as a covered veteran, status in the Uniformed Services of the United States, citizenship and any other characteristic protected by law.
Forever 21 Company Details
forever-21
19672 employees
401610.0
448
Retail Apparel and Fashion
forever21.com
Scan still pending
FOR_8417897
In-progress
Forever 21 Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Forever 21 Global Score.png)
Forever 21 Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Forever 21 Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Forever 21 | Breach | 50 | 4 | 11/2017 | FOR2314171223 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Forever 21, a US clothing retailer, revealed that there was a security breach at certain of its locations, resulting in the theft of payment card data. The company claims that unidentified hackers breach its payment systems and take credit cards that are used at some of its retail locations. The company acknowledged that, although it was only used at specific points of sale, it had adopted token-based authentication and encryption back in 2015. Customers are encouraged to keep a close eye on their payment card statements as unauthorised charges are still being investigated. | |||||||
| Forever 21 | Breach | 75 | 2 | 05/2023 | FOR1001050624 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Over a period of seven months in 2018, Forever 21 experienced a significant cybersecurity incident when attackers accessed payment card data from an undisclosed number of customers. The attackers managed to penetrate the network and deploy malware designed to harvest credit card information straight from the retailer's point-of-sale (POS) system. A critical security lapse was identified as some of Forever 21's POS devices were not encrypted, which likely facilitated the breach. The exact number of impacted customers remains unclear, even years after the incident. Forever 21 faced a class-action lawsuit as a result of this breach and agreed to settle by compensating for the 'valid out-of-pocket expenses and charges that were incurred and plausibly arose' due to the breach. However, the total financial impact of this compensation has not been disclosed, leaving the full extent of the damage somewhat opaque. | |||||||
| Forever 21 | Breach | 100 | 5 | 07/2018 | FOR305050624 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: Over a seven-month period in 2018, Forever 21 suffered a malware attack targeting their POS systems which led to the theft of payment card data of an undetermined number of customers. The fashion retailer acknowledged the lack of encryption on some POS devices, which facilitated the attack. The exact number of affected customers remains undisclosed, and the financial repercussions were not publicly shared. Nevertheless, Forever 21 settled a class-action lawsuit by agreeing to pay claims for expenses and charges arising from the incident, although the total cost of this settlement was not revealed. | |||||||
| Forever 21 | Breach | 100 | 5 | 07/2023 | FOR302050724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: In 2018, Forever 21 experienced a significant cybersecurity breach that lasted seven months. During this period, attackers accessed and likely stole payment card data through malware planted on the retailer's point-of-sale (POS) systems. Some of these systems weren't encrypted properly, exacerbating the vulnerability. The exact number of affected customers remains undisclosed, but the incident led to a class-action lawsuit. Forever 21 settled by agreeing to compensate for valid out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a result of the breach, though the total settlement cost was not revealed. | |||||||
| Forever 21 | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 07/2018 | FOR801050924 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization’s existenceDescription: Over a period of seven months in 2018, Forever 21 experienced a significant cyber attack in which attackers gained access to the payment card data of an unspecified number of customers. The attackers achieved this access after infiltrating the network and deploying malware to extract credit card data from the fashion retailer's POS system. A key issue that emerged was Forever 21's failure to encrypt some of its POS devices, which contributed to the effectiveness of the data breach. The exact number of affected customers remains undisclosed, and while the total cost of the breach was not made public, Forever 21 settled a class-action lawsuit to cover claims for expenses and charges incurred as a direct result of the incident. | |||||||
| Forever 21 | Data Leak | 85 | 4 | 03/2023 | FOR22111923 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The fashion retailer Forever 21 has discovered a cyber incident that impacted a limited number of systems and exposed the personal information of more than 500,000 individuals. The study found that between January 5 and March 21 of 2023, threat actors had numerous points of access to specific Forever 21 systems. The exposed information includes names, Social Security numbers, dates of birth, bank account numbers (without access code or pin), and information regarding the Forever21 health plan, including enrollment and premiums paid. To prevent similar incidents from occurring in the future, the company announced it has implemented additional cyber security measures to protect its infrastructure. FOREVER 21 offered a complimentary 12-month membership of Experian’s® IdentityWorks℠ identity protection service. | |||||||
Forever 21 Company Subsidiaries
Forever 21 continues to be a fashion industry leader with a mission to make the latest trends accessible to all. F21 persists on staying ahead of innovation and providing styles and fit that our customers love. While reinventing for now and beyond, we’re seeking passionate and creative new family members to join us on this adventure! F21 continues to operate E-commerce and 450 locations across the U.S. along with maintaining a strong brand DNA with consumers and within the fashion industry. In February 2020, Forever 21 came under new ownership made up of Simon Property Group, Brookfield Property Partners, and Authentic Brands Group. Under this new ownership F21 has the financial strength and long term view that will prepare us for the future, while continuing to set the same high standards as it always has. Join our team and learn the inner sanctum of the global fashion industry, while we build the new Forever 21! Forever 21 is operated by SPARC Group LLC. About SPARC Group LLC SPARC Group LLC offers operational and strategic expertise including retail and e-commerce management, sourcing, design and technology for leading global brands. SPARC Group is a joint venture between Simon Property Group, a preeminent retail real estate company and Authentic Brands Group, a global leader in brand development. In addition to Forever 21, SPARC Group brands include Aéropostale, Brooks Brothers, Nautica, Eddie Bauer, and Lucky Brand. SPARC Group LLC is an equal opportunity employer, and is committed to maintaining a workplace free from prohibited employment conduct, including discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, domestic partner status, civil partnership, status as a covered veteran, status in the Uniformed Services of the United States, citizenship and any other characteristic protected by law.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Forever 21 Cyber Security News
Forever 21 Was a Fast Fashion Pioneer. It Wasn’t Fast Enough.
None
What Indian businesses must learn: From the global M&S, Forever 21 retail breach crisis
The M&S breach and others around the world are a warning to Indian retailers. With digital adoption speeding up, so do the risks. Indian ...
Berkeley Research Group suffers cyber attack, sources say
Berkeley Research Group experienced a cyber attack last week, Bloomberg reported, citing sources familiar with the matter, as banks worked ...
Forever 21 files for bankruptcy again, to start liquidation sales
Forever 21's U.S. operating company on Sunday filed for bankruptcy for the second time in six years and said it would wind down its domestic ...
Consulting Firm BRG Suffers Cyberattack Amid LBO Debt Sale
Berkeley Research Group suffered a cyberattack last week, according to people with knowledge of the matter, just as banks have been looking ...
Nearly 540,000 people have SSNs leaked after cyberattack on retailer Forever 21
Major clothing brand Forever 21 revealed a wide-ranging data breach this week affecting almost 540,000 people. In a regulatory filing, the fast- ...
Forever 21 data breach impacts over half a million people
Forever 21 experienced a data security incident impacting a total of 539,207 people, according to documents filed with the Office of the Maine ...
Retail Cybersecurity in 2025: Trends, Risks, and Solutions
Retail cybersecurity protects sensitive customer data, financial information, and business operations from theft and disruption.
Forever 21 data breach affects half a million people
Clothing giant Forever 21 said a data breach earlier in the year affects more than half a million individuals.
Forever 21 Similar Companies
URBN (Urban Outfitters, Anthropologie Group, Free People & Nuuly)
URBN Urban Outfitters, Inc. (www.urbn.com) is a portfolio of global consumer brands comprised of Anthropologie, Free People, FP Movement, Terrain, Urban Outfitters, Nuuly and Menus & Venues. At URBN, we Lead with Creativity…. Creativity guides our approach to product, environment, experience, and co
VF Corporation
VF Corporation is one of the world’s largest apparel, footwear and accessories companies connecting people to the lifestyles, activities and experiences they cherish most through a family of iconic outdoor, active and workwear brands including Vans®, The North Face®, Timberland® and Dickies®. Our pu
ChenOne Stores Limited
ChenOne is a chain of fashion stores owned by the Chenab Group. The first ChenOne store was opened in 1997 at Islamabad with the sole ambition to bring world class standards to a local market. Currently, there are more than 30 business units changing lifestyles both locally and all over the globe.
Youngone Corporation
Founded in 1974, Youngone Corporation is a premier performance and outdoor apparel, footwear, bags and accessories manufacturer. We own and operate production facilities in Bangladesh, Vietnam, El Salvador, Uzbekistan, Ethiopia and most recently India. Through the more than 90,000 people we directly
Goldfame Group
Goldfame Enterprises Ltd. was established in 1992. Since our humble beginnings in Hong Kong and China, we have set up a sizable manufacturing base in the Kingdom of Cambodia in 1992, with a workforce of over 12,000 employees worldwide. Our knitting facilities are thoroughly equipped with 2,300 J
US Group
The name of US Group is synonymous with dependable, industry-focused, and humanized business savviness. We are a family owned professionally managed group of companies named after the first-born children Umer & Siddique of the two founders Mian Ahsan and Javed Bhatti. Since our beginning in 1975,
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Forever 21 CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Forever 21 has faced 6 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack', 'Breach', 'Data Leak'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Forever 21 continues to be a fashion industry leader with a mission to make the latest trends accessible to all. F21 persists on staying ahead of innovation and providing styles and fit that our customers love. While reinventing for now and beyond, we’re seeking passionate and creative new family members to join us on this adventure! F21 continues to operate E-commerce and 450 locations across the U.S. along with maintaining a strong brand DNA with consumers and within the fashion industry. In February 2020, Forever 21 came under new ownership made up of Simon Property Group, Brookfield Property Partners, and Authentic Brands Group. Under this new ownership F21 has the financial strength and long term view that will prepare us for the future, while continuing to set the same high standards as it always has. Join our team and learn the inner sanctum of the global fashion industry, while we build the new Forever 21! Forever 21 is operated by SPARC Group LLC. About SPARC Group LLC SPARC Group LLC offers operational and strategic expertise including retail and e-commerce management, sourcing, design and technology for leading global brands. SPARC Group is a joint venture between Simon Property Group, a preeminent retail real estate company and Authentic Brands Group, a global leader in brand development. In addition to Forever 21, SPARC Group brands include Aéropostale, Brooks Brothers, Nautica, Eddie Bauer, and Lucky Brand. SPARC Group LLC is an equal opportunity employer, and is committed to maintaining a workplace free from prohibited employment conduct, including discrimination or harassment on the basis of race, color, national origin, sex, age, religion, disability, genetic information, sexual orientation, gender identity or expression, marital status, domestic partner status, civil partnership, status as a covered veteran, status in the Uniformed Services of the United States, citizenship and any other characteristic protected by law..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach'].
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
