Comparison Overview

Exelon

VS

Duke Energy Corporation

Exelon

10 S. Dearborn, Chicago, 60603, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.exeloncorp.com

Exelon Corporation (Nasdaq: EXC) is one of the nation’s largest utility companies, serving more than 10 million customers through six fully regulated utilities. We believe that reliable and affordable energy is essential to a brighter, more sustainable future. We are a FORTUNE 250 company operating across a large urban footprint, serving major metro areas in Delaware, the District of Columbia, Illinois, Maryland, New Jersey and Pennsylvania. Exelon is recognized as an industry leader with best-in-class operations, a firm commitment to maintaining energy affordability, a track record of top-quartile reliability performance, strong ESG leadership and principles, and a deep dedication to supporting and investing in the communities we serve.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 19,357
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Duke Energy Corporation

525 S Tryon St, Charlotte, 28202, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.duke-energy.com

Duke Energy, a Fortune 150 company headquartered in Charlotte, N.C., is one of America’s largest energy holding companies. The company’s electric utilities serve 8.4 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Florida, Indiana, Ohio and Kentucky, and collectively own 54,800 megawatts of energy capacity. Its natural gas utilities serve 1.7 million customers in North Carolina, South Carolina, Tennessee, Ohio and Kentucky. Duke Energy is executing an ambitious clean energy transition, keeping reliability, affordability and accessibility at the forefront as the company works toward net-zero methane emissions from its natural gas business by 2030 and net-zero carbon emissions from electricity generation by 2050. The company is investing in major electric grid upgrades and cleaner generation, including expanded energy storage, renewables, natural gas and nuclear. Our team is available Monday to Friday from 8 a.m. to 5 p.m. EST. If you suspect an emergency, please call 911.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 25,252
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exelon.jpeg
Exelon
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duke-energy-corporation.jpeg
Duke Energy Corporation
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Exelon
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Duke Energy Corporation
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Exelon in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Duke Energy Corporation in 2026.

Incident History — Exelon (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Exelon cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Duke Energy Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Duke Energy Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/exelon.jpeg
Exelon
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/duke-energy-corporation.jpeg
Duke Energy Corporation
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Strategic dependencies and potential exploitation
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Duke Energy Corporation company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Exelon company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Duke Energy Corporation company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Exelon company has not reported any.

In the current year, Duke Energy Corporation company and Exelon company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Duke Energy Corporation company nor Exelon company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Duke Energy Corporation company nor Exelon company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Duke Energy Corporation company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Exelon company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Exelon company nor Duke Energy Corporation company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Exelon company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Duke Energy Corporation company.

Duke Energy Corporation company employs more people globally than Exelon company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Exelon nor Duke Energy Corporation holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References