Comparison Overview

Essar

VS

Odebrecht

Essar

Essar House, 11, Keshavrao Khadye Marg, Mahalaxmi, Mumbai, 400 034, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Essar, with an entrepreneurial track record spanning 50+ years, specialises in investing and developing assets to create value in core sectors such as Energy, Infrastructure, Metals & Mining, and Technology & Retail. With a presence in eight countries, Essar generates revenues of US$15 billion and provides employment for over 7,000 people. Over the past five years, Essar has strategically rebalanced its portfolio by monetising some world-class assets. Essar is now positioned to transition its existing assets to a greener regime and invest in businesses driving the transformation of sector landscapes from carbon-centric to a clean energy ecosystem, both nationally and globally. The Group is developing sustainable assets and industry ecosystems, with a particular focus on hydrogen, green mobility, and green steel. Essar Foundation, the CSR arm of Essar, has a rich 50-year heritage of service across India, focusing on areas such as health, education, livelihood, women empowerment, sports, environment, and infrastructure.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 10,565
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Odebrecht

Av. Luís Viana, 2841, Salvador, 41730-900, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Founded in 1944, Odebrecht is a Brazilian group with diverse businesses and world-class standards of quality. Its Members, guided by the Group’s own philosophy, the Odebrecht Entrepreneurial Technology (TEO), provide services and manufacture products for clients on five continents. As part of their entrepreneurial responsibility while serving clients and local communities, they contribute to the development of economically prosperous, socially just, environmentally sustainable, politically inclusive and culturally rich societies and countries.

NAICS: 5239
NAICS Definition: Other Financial Investment Activities
Employees: 14,112
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/essar.jpeg
Essar
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Essar
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Odebrecht
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Essar in 2026.

Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Odebrecht in 2026.

Incident History — Essar (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Essar cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Odebrecht (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Odebrecht cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/essar.jpeg
Essar
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/odebrecht.jpeg
Odebrecht
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Odebrecht company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Essar company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Odebrecht company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Essar company.

In the current year, Odebrecht company and Essar company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Essar company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Essar company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Odebrecht company nor Essar company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Essar company nor Odebrecht company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Essar company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Odebrecht company.

Odebrecht company employs more people globally than Essar company, reflecting its scale as a Investment Management.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Essar nor Odebrecht holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H