Comparison Overview

Erasmus MC

VS

Rede D'Or

Erasmus MC

Dr. Molewaterplein 40, Rotterdam, Zuid-Holland, NL, 3015 GD
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

We are Erasmus MC. Our roots lie in Rotterdam, a city and port of international standing. We are the most innovative university medical center in the Netherlands and one of the world’s leading centers of scientific research. We are committed to achieving a healthy population and pursuing excellence in healthcare through research and teaching. Day in, day out, our staff, volunteers and students work with passion and dedication to achieve everything we stand for: safe, first-rate healthcare for patients with complex issues, unusual and rare conditions or acute needs. But we also stand for top-quality teaching that attracts ambitious, inquisitive and talented students and seeks to answer the healthcare questions of tomorrow. And we stand for world-class scientific research that bolsters our understanding of diseases and disorders and helps to predict, treat and prevent them. We do our work based on our basic principles, the core values of Erasmus MC, 'responsible'​, 'connecting'​ and 'enterprising'​. We believe that we provide the best care, research and education if we are responsible, binding and enterprising.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 13,924
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Rede D'Or

Rede D'Or São Luiz, Rio de Janeiro, BR
Last Update: 2026-03-29

A Rede D’Or é a maior rede de saúde da América Latina. São 79 hospitais e mais de 60 clínicas oncológicas com presença nos estados de AL, BA, CE, DF, MA, MG, MS, PA, PB, PE, PR, RJ, SE, SP. Referência em qualidade técnica, a Rede D’Or atua em serviços complementares como banco de sangue, diálise e ambulatórios de diversas especialidades. A Rede D’Or também investe em inovação e pesquisa clínica por meio do IDOR - Instituto D’Or de Pesquisa e Ensino. Siga a Rede D’Or também em: Instagram: @rededor_oficial Facebook: https://www.facebook.com/rededor YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/user/rededorsaoluiz

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 40,067
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erasmus-mc.jpeg
Erasmus MC
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rededor.jpeg
Rede D'Or
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Erasmus MC
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rede D'Or
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Erasmus MC in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rede D'Or in 2026.

Incident History — Erasmus MC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Erasmus MC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rede D'Or (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rede D'Or cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erasmus-mc.jpeg
Erasmus MC
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rededor.jpeg
Rede D'Or
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rede D'Or company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Erasmus MC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Rede D'Or company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Erasmus MC company.

In the current year, Rede D'Or company and Erasmus MC company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Rede D'Or company nor Erasmus MC company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rede D'Or company nor Erasmus MC company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Rede D'Or company nor Erasmus MC company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Erasmus MC company nor Rede D'Or company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Erasmus MC company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rede D'Or company.

Rede D'Or company employs more people globally than Erasmus MC company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Erasmus MC nor Rede D'Or holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N