
ENERCON Company Cyber Security Posture
enercon.deENERCON: Pioneer in wind energy technology, partner in the energy transition and attractive employer in a future-orientated industry. Thanks to innovative turbine technology, high quality standards and many years of experience, ENERCON is one of the leading manufacturers of onshore wind turbines. Dr Aloys Wobben founded ENERCON in Aurich (East Frisia) in 1984. With just a few employees, he developed the company's first wind turbines. The company was the first wind turbine manufacturer to use a gearless drive concept, which characterises all ENERCON wind turbines. ENERCON is also a pioneer in areas such as rotor blade design, control and grid connection technology, and continues to demonstrate its great innovative strength with a large number of new technological developments. Today, ENERCON is active worldwide and is already present in over 35 countries with a decentralised service and sales network. This means that we not only offer our employees international career opportunities, but also very close cooperation with team colleagues abroad. We all share a common goal: energy for the world. Shapers of the future wanted: Become part of our vision and bring a breath of fresh air to our team! ENERCON offers challenging career prospects in a wide range of areas such as Research & Development, IT, Project Management, Sales and in the Commercial Sector. Apply now: https://www.enercon.de/karriere Imprint: https://www.enercon.de/impressum Data protection: https://www.enercon.de/de/datenschutz
ENERCON Company Details
enercon-gmbh
6085 employees
304917.0
none
Renewable Energy Equipment Manufacturing
enercon.de
Scan still pending
ENE_1145990
In-progress

Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

ENERCON Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
ENERCON Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ENERCON | Cyber Attack | 100 | 6 | 04/2022 | ENE34624522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: Germany-based Nordex was targeted in a cyberattack recently in March 2022. The company set up an immediate response team to contain the issue and prevent further propagation and assess the extent of potential exposure and shut down IT systems across multiple locations and business units. The company also suffered collateral damage during the cyberattack on European satellite systems, Vestas, which is responsible for remotely monitoring and controlling nearly its 6,000 systems. |
ENERCON Company Subsidiaries

ENERCON: Pioneer in wind energy technology, partner in the energy transition and attractive employer in a future-orientated industry. Thanks to innovative turbine technology, high quality standards and many years of experience, ENERCON is one of the leading manufacturers of onshore wind turbines. Dr Aloys Wobben founded ENERCON in Aurich (East Frisia) in 1984. With just a few employees, he developed the company's first wind turbines. The company was the first wind turbine manufacturer to use a gearless drive concept, which characterises all ENERCON wind turbines. ENERCON is also a pioneer in areas such as rotor blade design, control and grid connection technology, and continues to demonstrate its great innovative strength with a large number of new technological developments. Today, ENERCON is active worldwide and is already present in over 35 countries with a decentralised service and sales network. This means that we not only offer our employees international career opportunities, but also very close cooperation with team colleagues abroad. We all share a common goal: energy for the world. Shapers of the future wanted: Become part of our vision and bring a breath of fresh air to our team! ENERCON offers challenging career prospects in a wide range of areas such as Research & Development, IT, Project Management, Sales and in the Commercial Sector. Apply now: https://www.enercon.de/karriere Imprint: https://www.enercon.de/impressum Data protection: https://www.enercon.de/de/datenschutz
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
ENERCON Cyber Security News
Satellite outage knocks out thousands of Enercon's wind turbines
Germany's Enercon on Monday said a "massive disruption" of satellite connections in Europe was affecting the operations of 5800 windย ...
Wind turbine maker Nordex shuts down systems as cyber attack hits
Germany-based Nordex has shut down IT systems across its business after becoming the latest turbine manufacturer to be hit by a cyber attack.
The challenges of Wind Power โThrowing caution to the windโ
The idiom 'Throwing caution to the wind' is defined as 'doing something without worrying about the risk or negative results' While we allย ...
Viasat network cyberattack linked to newly discovered Russian wiper
The attack disrupted service to several thousand satellite broadband customers in Ukraine and tens of thousands of fixed broadband customersย ...
AcidRain | A Modem Wiper Rains Down on Europe
As the most impactful cyber attack of the Ukrainian invasion gets downplayed, SentinelLabs uncovers a more plausible explanation.
Protecting Wind Energy Systems From Cyberattacks
An Idaho National Laboratory report takes the first comprehensive look at cyberattack risks that could jeopardize U.S. wind energy systemsย ...
German wind turbine maker shut down after cyberattack
A German wind turbine maker was forced to shut down its IT systems across multiple locations and business units after it was hit with a cyberattack.
Repeated cyberattacks cause concern about German wind industryโs IT security
A string of apparently targeted cyberattacks on German wind farms has led to worries that the country's main future power source is notย ...
Germany gets serious about cyber threats
The attack made national headlines when, for the first time in German history, authorities declared a state of emergency because of aย ...

ENERCON Similar Companies

Goldwind
As a reliable global strategic partner in clean energy, Goldwind is committed Driving a Renewable Future and centering its business on Ecology-Oriented Development+ENERGY industry model. Goldwindโรรดs global business network covers more than 40 countries across 6 continents. We have approximately 11,

Vestas
Vestas is the energy industryโs global partner on sustainable energy solutions. We design, manufacture, install, and service wind turbines across the globe, and with +154 GW of wind turbines in 87 countries, we have installed more wind power than anyone else. Through our industry-leading smart data

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
ENERCON CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, ENERCON has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as ENERCON: Pioneer in wind energy technology, partner in the energy transition and attractive employer in a future-orientated industry. Thanks to innovative turbine technology, high quality standards and many years of experience, ENERCON is one of the leading manufacturers of onshore wind turbines. Dr Aloys Wobben founded ENERCON in Aurich (East Frisia) in 1984. With just a few employees, he developed the company's first wind turbines. The company was the first wind turbine manufacturer to use a gearless drive concept, which characterises all ENERCON wind turbines. ENERCON is also a pioneer in areas such as rotor blade design, control and grid connection technology, and continues to demonstrate its great innovative strength with a large number of new technological developments. Today, ENERCON is active worldwide and is already present in over 35 countries with a decentralised service and sales network. This means that we not only offer our employees international career opportunities, but also very close cooperation with team colleagues abroad. We all share a common goal: energy for the world. Shapers of the future wanted: Become part of our vision and bring a breath of fresh air to our team! ENERCON offers challenging career prospects in a wide range of areas such as Research & Development, IT, Project Management, Sales and in the Commercial Sector. Apply now: https://www.enercon.de/karriere Imprint: https://www.enercon.de/impressum Data protection: https://www.enercon.de/de/datenschutz.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
