Comparison Overview

Enedis

VS

PT PLN (Persero)

Enedis

4 place de la Pyramide, Puteaux, FR, 92800
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Enedis est le gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité sur 95 % du territoire français continental. Ses 38 859 collaborateurs assurent chaque jour l’exploitation, l’entretien et le développement de près de 1,3 million de kilomètres de réseau. Raccordement, mise en service, dépannage, changement de fournisseur... Autant d’opérations assurées quotidiennement par Enedis. En tant que gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité, Enedis réalise chaque année de nombreuses interventions : plus de 11 millions en 2014. La nature des prestations diffère selon les clients : clients finaux, fournisseurs ou producteurs d’électricité.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 23,409
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

PT PLN (Persero)

Jl. Trunojoyo Blok M I/135, Jakarta Selatan, 12160, ID
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Indonesia State Electricity Corporation PLN has a long history in electricity industry of Indonesia. As the sole provider of electricity in Indonesia, PLN is striving to increase quality of services to all Indonesian. In 1972, in accordance with Government Regulation No.17, the State-owned Electricity Company was enacted as a State-owned General Electricity Company and as PKUK responsible to provide electricity to meet public needs. While the Government policy was giving opportunity to the Private Sectors to focus on the provision of electricity, the status of PLN was changed from a General Company to Corporation’ as well as PKUK in providing electricity for public needs until the present. Throughout the 75 years of journey, PT PLN (Persero) has succeeded in becoming one of the companies with the largest assets in Indonesia of IDR 1,589 Trillion (PT PLN (Persero) Financial Report 2020 Audited).

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 24,902
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enedis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
PT PLN (Persero)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enedis in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for PT PLN (Persero) in 2026.

Incident History — Enedis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enedis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — PT PLN (Persero) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

PT PLN (Persero) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pt-pln-persero-.jpeg
PT PLN (Persero)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

PT PLN (Persero) company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enedis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, PT PLN (Persero) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enedis company.

In the current year, PT PLN (Persero) company and Enedis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither PT PLN (Persero) company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enedis company nor PT PLN (Persero) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enedis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to PT PLN (Persero) company.

PT PLN (Persero) company employs more people globally than Enedis company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enedis nor PT PLN (Persero) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H