Comparison Overview

Enedis

VS

NextEra Energy, Inc.

Enedis

4 place de la Pyramide, Puteaux, FR, 92800
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Enedis est le gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité sur 95 % du territoire français continental. Ses 38 859 collaborateurs assurent chaque jour l’exploitation, l’entretien et le développement de près de 1,3 million de kilomètres de réseau. Raccordement, mise en service, dépannage, changement de fournisseur... Autant d’opérations assurées quotidiennement par Enedis. En tant que gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité, Enedis réalise chaque année de nombreuses interventions : plus de 11 millions en 2014. La nature des prestations diffère selon les clients : clients finaux, fournisseurs ou producteurs d’électricité.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 23,409
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

NextEra Energy, Inc.

700 Universe Blvd, Juno Beach, FL, US, 33408
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849

NextEra Energy, Inc. (NYSE: NEE) is one of the largest electric power and energy infrastructure companies in North America and is a leading provider of electricity to American homes and businesses. Headquartered in Juno Beach, Florida, NextEra Energy is a Fortune 200 company that owns Florida Power & Light Company, America’s largest electric utility, which provides reliable electricity to approximately 12 million people across Florida. NextEra Energy also owns one of the largest energy infrastructure development companies in the U.S., NextEra Energy Resources, LLC. NextEra Energy and its affiliated entities are meeting America’s growing energy needs with a diverse mix of energy sources, including natural gas, nuclear, renewable energy and battery storage. For more information about NextEra Energy companies, visit these websites: www.NextEraEnergy.com, www.FPL.com, www.NextEraEnergyResources.com.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 12,283
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nextera-energy-inc.jpeg
NextEra Energy, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enedis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
NextEra Energy, Inc.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enedis in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NextEra Energy, Inc. in 2026.

Incident History — Enedis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enedis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — NextEra Energy, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NextEra Energy, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nextera-energy-inc.jpeg
NextEra Energy, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

NextEra Energy, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enedis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, NextEra Energy, Inc. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Enedis company.

In the current year, NextEra Energy, Inc. company and Enedis company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither NextEra Energy, Inc. company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither NextEra Energy, Inc. company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither NextEra Energy, Inc. company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enedis company nor NextEra Energy, Inc. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enedis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to NextEra Energy, Inc. company.

Enedis company employs more people globally than NextEra Energy, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enedis nor NextEra Energy, Inc. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H