Comparison Overview

Enedis

VS

Enel Group

Enedis

4 place de la Pyramide, Puteaux, FR, 92800
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.enedis.fr/

Enedis est le gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité sur 95 % du territoire français continental. Ses 38 859 collaborateurs assurent chaque jour l’exploitation, l’entretien et le développement de près de 1,3 million de kilomètres de réseau. Raccordement, mise en service, dépannage, changement de fournisseur... Autant d’opérations assurées quotidiennement par Enedis. En tant que gestionnaire du réseau public de distribution d’électricité, Enedis réalise chaque année de nombreuses interventions : plus de 11 millions en 2014. La nature des prestations diffère selon les clients : clients finaux, fournisseurs ou producteurs d’électricité.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 23,409
Subsidiaries: 35
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Enel Group

Viale Regina Margherita 125, Rome, 00198, IT
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.enel.com

We are a multinational company changing the face of energy, one of the world’s leading integrated utilities. As the largest private player in producing clean energy with renewable sources we have more than 92 GW of total capacity, including around 67 GW of renewables. Distributing electricity through a network of 1.9 million kilometers to 69 million end users, being the first private network operator globally, and proudly bringing energy to approximately 54 million homes and businesses. People are the heart of our energy: our Group is made up of more than 60,000 people operating in 28 countries and our work is based on our values of Trust, Innovation, Proactivity, Flexibility and Respect. Diversity and inclusion play a key role for us, leading to our being recognized in all three of the most prestigious indices and rankings that assess corporate performance on gender diversity at the workplace and beyond: the Refinitiv Diversity Inclusion Index, the Bloomberg Gender Equality Index, and the Equileap Gender Equality Global Report & Ranking. Let’s shape the energy of the future together.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 30,413
Subsidiaries: 22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enelgroup.jpeg
Enel Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Enedis
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Enel Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enedis in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Enel Group in 2026.

Incident History — Enedis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enedis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Enel Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Enel Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enedis.jpeg
Enedis
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/enelgroup.jpeg
Enel Group
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial Gain (Data for Sale)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Enel Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Enedis company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Enel Group company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Enedis company has not reported any.

In the current year, Enel Group company has reported more cyber incidents than Enedis company.

Neither Enel Group company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Enel Group company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Enedis company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Enel Group company nor Enedis company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Enedis company nor Enel Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Enedis company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Enel Group company.

Enel Group company employs more people globally than Enedis company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Enedis nor Enel Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References