Comparison Overview

Embraer

VS

SpaceX

Embraer

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170, São José dos Campos, 12227-901, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://embraer.com/global/en

A global aerospace company headquartered in Brazil, Embraer has businesses in Commercial and Executive Aviation, Defense & Security, and Agricultural Aviation. The company designs, develops, manufactures and markets aircraft and systems, providing Services and Support to customer after-sales. Since it was founded in 1969, Embraer has delivered more than 8,000 aircraft. On average, about every 10 seconds an aircraft manufactured by Embraer takes off somewhere in the world, transporting over 145 million passengers a year.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 24,241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

SpaceX

Rocket Road, Hawthorne, California, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749
http://www.spacex.com

SpaceX designs, manufactures and launches the world’s most advanced rockets and spacecraft. The company was founded in 2002 by Elon Musk to revolutionize space transportation, with the ultimate goal of making life multiplanetary. SpaceX has gained worldwide attention for a series of historic milestones. It is the only private company ever to return a spacecraft from low-Earth orbit, which it first accomplished in December 2010. The company made history again in May 2012 when its Dragon spacecraft attached to the International Space Station, exchanged cargo payloads, and returned safely to Earth — a technically challenging feat previously accomplished only by governments. Since then Dragon has delivered cargo to and from the space station multiple times, providing regular cargo resupply missions for NASA. For more information, visit www.spacex.com.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 17,520
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Embraer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
SpaceX
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Embraer in 2026.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for SpaceX in 2026.

Incident History — Embraer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Embraer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — SpaceX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

SpaceX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/spacex.jpeg
SpaceX
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Physical Access / Human Error
Motivation: Potential espionage or unauthorized data collection
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unremediated vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2024
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Attempt at humor
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Embraer company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to SpaceX company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

SpaceX company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Embraer company.

In the current year, SpaceX company and Embraer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither SpaceX company nor Embraer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

SpaceX company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Embraer company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both SpaceX company and Embraer company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

Neither Embraer company nor SpaceX company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Embraer company nor SpaceX company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Embraer company employs more people globally than SpaceX company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Embraer nor SpaceX holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References