Comparison Overview

Embraer

VS

Safran

Embraer

Av. Brigadeiro Faria Lima, 2170, São José dos Campos, 12227-901, BR
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://embraer.com/global/en

A global aerospace company headquartered in Brazil, Embraer has businesses in Commercial and Executive Aviation, Defense & Security, and Agricultural Aviation. The company designs, develops, manufactures and markets aircraft and systems, providing Services and Support to customer after-sales. Since it was founded in 1969, Embraer has delivered more than 8,000 aircraft. On average, about every 10 seconds an aircraft manufactured by Embraer takes off somewhere in the world, transporting over 145 million passengers a year.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 24,241
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Safran

2, Boulevard du général Martial Valin, Paris, 75015, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
http://www.safran-group.com/

Safran is an international high-technology group, operating in the aviation (propulsion, equipment and interiors), defense and space markets. Its core purpose is to contribute to a safer, more sustainable world, where air transport is more environmentally friendly, comfortable and accessible. Safran has a global presence, with 100,000 employees and holds, alone or in partnership, world or European leadership positions in its core markets.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 73,347
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safran.jpeg
Safran
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Embraer
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Safran
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Embraer in 2026.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Safran in 2026.

Incident History — Embraer (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Embraer cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Safran (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Safran cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/embraer.jpeg
Embraer
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2020
Type:Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/safran.jpeg
Safran
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Misconfiguration
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Safran company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Embraer company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Embraer and Safran have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Safran company and Embraer company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Safran company nor Embraer company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Safran company nor Embraer company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Embraer company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Safran company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Embraer company nor Safran company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Safran company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Embraer company.

Safran company employs more people globally than Embraer company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Embraer nor Safran holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References