Comparison Overview

Elsevier

VS

CASA

Elsevier

Radarweg 29, Amsterdam, 1043, NL
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799

We deliver mission-critical insights and tools for impact makers worldwide. Advancing human progress by providing solutions for better outcomes, global outreach, and stakeholder engagement. Let's shape progress together.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 12,653
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

CASA

CASA Building, Bedfordview, 2008, ZA
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

CASA is an industry leading association that can provide you with the edge you need to be an effective business owner with a substantial property portfolio and gives you the power to confidently manage your business and structures to enable you, the business owner, to later on become a member of our exclusive business and investment consortiums.

NAICS: 519
NAICS Definition: Other Information Services
Employees: 18,542
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsevier.jpeg
Elsevier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa_2.jpeg
CASA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Elsevier
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
CASA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Elsevier in 2026.

Incidents vs Information Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CASA in 2026.

Incident History — Elsevier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Elsevier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — CASA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CASA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elsevier.jpeg
Elsevier
Incidents

Date Detected: 03/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Open Server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/casa_2.jpeg
CASA
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Elsevier company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CASA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Elsevier company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CASA company has not reported any.

In the current year, CASA company and Elsevier company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither CASA company nor Elsevier company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither CASA company nor Elsevier company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither CASA company nor Elsevier company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Elsevier company nor CASA company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Elsevier company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CASA company.

CASA company employs more people globally than Elsevier company, reflecting its scale as a Information Services.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Elsevier nor CASA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H