Comparison Overview

ELAN Group

VS

Princeton Tec

ELAN Group

Begunje 1, Begunje na Gorenjskem, 4275, SI
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.elan.si/en

Elan is one of the most innovative global sports products brands. Leading by innovation, Elan strives to enhance products in all segments to achieve the ultimate user experience. As a leading producer and supplier of sports and leisure time activities equipment, we have been present in global markets for over 80 years. All Elan’s enterprises are devoted to the development of innovative products and progressive design through an innovative approach and advanced technology. Elan’s production facilities are located in Central Europe - skis, sail yachts, and composite components are all produced in Begunje, Slovenia. Elan owns four companies that market its products in Canada, USA, Germany & Austria, and Japan, along with independent distributors around the world. For more check: www.elanskis.com www.elan-yachts.com www.elan-composites.com www.elan-inventa.com

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 173
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Princeton Tec

PO Box 8057, Pennsauken, 08650, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 750 and 799
https://linktr.ee/princetontec

For over 45 years, Princeton Tec has pushed the limits of possibility with innovative lights that shine bright in every situation. We create durable, American-made products for active service members, first responders, everyday heroes, and adventure seekers. Our flashlights and headlamps stand up to the most rugged conditions and give confidence to those who boldly go where few will tread.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 39
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elan-d.o.o..jpeg
ELAN Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-tec.jpeg
Princeton Tec
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
ELAN Group
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Princeton Tec
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ELAN Group in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Princeton Tec in 2026.

Incident History — ELAN Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ELAN Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Princeton Tec (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Princeton Tec cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/elan-d.o.o..jpeg
ELAN Group
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/princeton-tec.jpeg
Princeton Tec
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ELAN Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Princeton Tec company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Princeton Tec company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to ELAN Group company.

In the current year, Princeton Tec company and ELAN Group company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Princeton Tec company nor ELAN Group company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Princeton Tec company nor ELAN Group company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Princeton Tec company nor ELAN Group company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither ELAN Group company nor Princeton Tec company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither ELAN Group company nor Princeton Tec company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

ELAN Group company employs more people globally than Princeton Tec company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds HIPAA certification.

Neither ELAN Group nor Princeton Tec holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References