Comparison Overview

Eddyline Kayaks

VS

Nokona

Eddyline Kayaks

98288, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

Thank you for your interest in Eddyline Kayaks! Since 1971, our management-owned business has worked hard to give customers a superb kayaking experience. Eddyline’s unique designs are a direct reflection of the input we’ve received from customers. Whether you are new to the sport or an avid enthusiast, we’ve developed a line of kayaks that will help you have the best experience on the water. Our customers inspire us every day with their passion for the water. Eddyline is headquartered in Siloam Springs, Arkansas and produces its high quality kayaks in Queretaro, Mexico. WARRANTY We offer a 3 year limited warranty covering defects in materials in workmanship. ENVIRONMENTALLY FRIENDLY Our manufacturing process consumes less energy than other methods and nearly 100% of our scrap material is recycled At Eddyline we promise to strive daily to: - Build the highest quality kayaks and paddles with meticulous attention to detail - Support our customers with “best in class” service for their adventures - Innovate to improve the comfort, performance and reliability of our kayaks and paddles

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 18
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Nokona

4602 E Thomas Rd, Phoenix, 85018, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Nokona has been making ballgloves in the USA since 1934, and represents the best of American quality, craftsmanship, and innovation. We are a baseball company, providing top-of-the-line ballgloves and leather goods, all made with our famous, proprietary ballglove leathers. Every Nokona item is individually cut, stamped, stitched, laced, and embroidered by skilled American workers, which gives each one its own unique identity and feel. We are proud to put classic American workmanship into all of our products, using techniques that we have developed and refined for almost 100 years.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 30
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eddyline-kayaks.jpeg
Eddyline Kayaks
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nokona.jpeg
Nokona
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Eddyline Kayaks
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Nokona
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eddyline Kayaks in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Nokona in 2026.

Incident History — Eddyline Kayaks (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eddyline Kayaks cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Nokona (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Nokona cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/eddyline-kayaks.jpeg
Eddyline Kayaks
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/nokona.jpeg
Nokona
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Eddyline Kayaks company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Nokona company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Nokona company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Eddyline Kayaks company.

In the current year, Nokona company and Eddyline Kayaks company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Nokona company nor Eddyline Kayaks company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Nokona company nor Eddyline Kayaks company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Nokona company nor Eddyline Kayaks company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks company nor Nokona company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks company nor Nokona company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Nokona company employs more people globally than Eddyline Kayaks company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Eddyline Kayaks nor Nokona holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H