E.Leclerc Company Cyber Security Posture
e.leclercDepuis plus de 70 ans, E.Leclerc poursuit un objectif : démocratiser la consommation, c'est l'expression de son utilité sociale. Cet engagement au service du plus grand nombre doit permettre à chacun d'accéder aux produits et services dont il a besoin ou envie, au quotidien. L'accessibilité, qu'elle soit une question de prix, de proximité ou d'information, est un combat permanent, sans cesse renouvelé par les attentes des consommateurs et les enjeux de société. Améliorer le pouvoir d'achat des consommateurs au quotidien ; Briser les monopoles pour ouvrir de nouveaux marchés, comme la parapharmacie ou les produits culturels ; Soutenir à la fois les producteurs français au travers des "Alliances Locales", et la préservation de l'environnement avec l'opération "Nettoyons la Nature" qui rassemble chaque année plusieurs centaines de milliers de bénévoles ; Développer les savoir-faire qui offrent une expérience toujours plus positive, durable et engagée dans la consommation ; tels sont les engagements qui caractérisent l'action de E.Leclerc et façonnent son image parmi les marques préférées des Français. Enseigne coopérative portée par 587 adhérents dans 721 centres et 690 drives, et par des millions de clients dans toute la France, E.Leclerc est leader du secteur de la grande distribution. Rejoignez le mouvement !
E.Leclerc Company Details
e-leclerc
10,001+ employees
235052
445
Retail Groceries
e.leclerc
Scan still pending
E.L_2142421
In-progress
E.Leclerc Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
E.Leclerc Global Score.png)
E.Leclerc Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
E.Leclerc Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
E.Leclerc Company Subsidiaries
Depuis plus de 70 ans, E.Leclerc poursuit un objectif : démocratiser la consommation, c'est l'expression de son utilité sociale. Cet engagement au service du plus grand nombre doit permettre à chacun d'accéder aux produits et services dont il a besoin ou envie, au quotidien. L'accessibilité, qu'elle soit une question de prix, de proximité ou d'information, est un combat permanent, sans cesse renouvelé par les attentes des consommateurs et les enjeux de société. Améliorer le pouvoir d'achat des consommateurs au quotidien ; Briser les monopoles pour ouvrir de nouveaux marchés, comme la parapharmacie ou les produits culturels ; Soutenir à la fois les producteurs français au travers des "Alliances Locales", et la préservation de l'environnement avec l'opération "Nettoyons la Nature" qui rassemble chaque année plusieurs centaines de milliers de bénévoles ; Développer les savoir-faire qui offrent une expérience toujours plus positive, durable et engagée dans la consommation ; tels sont les engagements qui caractérisent l'action de E.Leclerc et façonnent son image parmi les marques préférées des Français. Enseigne coopérative portée par 587 adhérents dans 721 centres et 690 drives, et par des millions de clients dans toute la France, E.Leclerc est leader du secteur de la grande distribution. Rejoignez le mouvement !
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
E.Leclerc Cyber Security News
HHS Proposed Rule Would Increase Cybersecurity Requirements for Electronic Health Data
HHS has proposed a rule to shore up cybersecurity protections for electronic health records under the Health Insurance Portability and ...
8th E.DSO/EE-ISAC/ENCS/ENISA Cybersecurity Forum
This report explores the cybersecurity of Low Earth Orbit (LEO) constellations providing telecommunications services (LEO satcom). Examining various threats and ...
Security Systems Startup Verkada Hits $4.5B Valuation After Series E
Cohere, a generative AI startup, is seeking to raise over $500 million at a valuation of more than $5.5 billion, according to Financial Times.
Cybersecurity in Banking: Threats, Solutions & Best Practices
Encryption, firewalls, and secure access controls are just a few of the measures that banks implement to ensure customer data remains protected.
Top Tips for Staff: help your staff keep your organisation safe online
Online introductory cyber security training from UK government for the staff of SMEs, charities and voluntary organisations to help keep them safe online.
Spring Cleaning: Legislative Plans for Cybersecurity, Business Data, AI, and e-Evidence
The Government published its new Legislation Programme setting out legislation to be published or drafted as a priority this Spring 2025.
Cyber defence
NATO's focus in cyber defence is to protect its own networks, operate in cyberspace (including through the Alliance's operations and missions), ...
Centre for Cybersecurity
Our objective is to support every individual and organization to securely benefit from ongoing digital and technological progress.
E-News | Employees must complete cybersecurity awareness training
Employees on all campuses are required to complete annual cybersecurity awareness training. Approved by the WVU Board of Governors, training will begin ...
E.Leclerc Similar Companies
Netto est l’enseigne de hard discount qui aide les Français à consommer moins cher et plus malin au quotidien. Sa force : des prix bas, toute l’année, sur une large gamme de produits qui misent sur le plaisir. Parce que « moins cher » ne rime pas avec « moins bien », Netto propose des r
Groupe Casino
2020 reminded us that retail plays a crucial role in society. Retailing obviously involves distributing safe, high-quality products, but it also means welcoming, connecting, serving, bringing together and even reassuring people. Since 1898, Casino Group has developed and enhanced its banners in Fr
Roady
Spécialiste de l’équipement, de l’entretien et de la réparation automobile, Roady est une enseigne du Groupement des Mousquetaires. Les 155 points de vente du réseau (119 en France, 36 au Portugal) sont à taille humaine. D’une surface totale de 800 m², ils sont constitués d’un ateli
Jumbo Retail Argentina
Jumbo Retail Argentina, empresa del grupo Cencosud, es una compañía con fuerte presencia en Argentina, Chile, Perú, Brasil y Colombia. Desde hace 25 años Jumbo Retail Argentina se diferencia por el servicio a nuestros clientes, apostando al compromiso de mayor calidad. En Argentina cuenta con las m
Dingdong (Cayman) Ltd
Dingdong (Cayman) Limited operates an e-commerce company in China. The company offers fresh produce, meat, seafood, prepared food, and other food products, such as dairy and bakery products, snacks, oil, seasonings, and beverages. It operates as a self-operated online retail business primarily throu
Giant Eagle, Inc.
Giant Eagle strives to be a best place to work in the eyes of the nearly 36,000 individuals who work in our stores, pharmacies, warehouses and in our corporate offices. At Giant Eagle, you'll have the opportunity to develop a real career with countless opportunities for you to grow with us. The way
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
E.Leclerc CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, E.Leclerc has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, E.Leclerc has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Depuis plus de 70 ans, E.Leclerc poursuit un objectif : démocratiser la consommation, c'est l'expression de son utilité sociale. Cet engagement au service du plus grand nombre doit permettre à chacun d'accéder aux produits et services dont il a besoin ou envie, au quotidien. L'accessibilité, qu'elle soit une question de prix, de proximité ou d'information, est un combat permanent, sans cesse renouvelé par les attentes des consommateurs et les enjeux de société. Améliorer le pouvoir d'achat des consommateurs au quotidien ; Briser les monopoles pour ouvrir de nouveaux marchés, comme la parapharmacie ou les produits culturels ; Soutenir à la fois les producteurs français au travers des "Alliances Locales", et la préservation de l'environnement avec l'opération "Nettoyons la Nature" qui rassemble chaque année plusieurs centaines de milliers de bénévoles ; Développer les savoir-faire qui offrent une expérience toujours plus positive, durable et engagée dans la consommation ; tels sont les engagements qui caractérisent l'action de E.Leclerc et façonnent son image parmi les marques préférées des Français. Enseigne coopérative portée par 587 adhérents dans 721 centres et 690 drives, et par des millions de clients dans toute la France, E.Leclerc est leader du secteur de la grande distribution. Rejoignez le mouvement !.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
