Comparison Overview

Diadem Sports

VS

Babolat

Diadem Sports

200 Park Central Blvd South, Pompano, 33064, US
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.diademsports.com

Our goal is to develop the most innovative, high-quality sports products in the world. We specifically design our products with a focus on helping players maximize their skills and compete at their highest level. Diadem offers a full product line of performance tennis and pickleball equipment including rackets, paddles, strings, bags, grips, accessories and apparel. We're dedicated to achieving superior levels of quality in our products - and our extensive development process and rigorous testing ensures that we meet those standards in all that we do. Diadem is an American-based brand, with an international presence. Designed by players, for players.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Babolat

33 quai Paul Sédallian, Lyon, 69009, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
http://www.babolat.com

Babolat is a proud family-owned company whose history with racquet sports began in 1875, accompanying the birth of tennis and badminton. The Lyon-based brand built its expertise on a raw material, natural gut, from which the first racquet strings were made and proceeded to become a leading equipment supplier for racquet sports lovers. Today, tradition and innovation are combined to serve players and the game. The brand is carried to the highest level by champions in the most prestigious tennis, padel and badminton competitions. Today, the Babolat is made up of almost 450 employees around the world.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 572
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diadem-sports.jpeg
Diadem Sports
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/babolat.jpeg
Babolat
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Diadem Sports
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Babolat
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diadem Sports in 2026.

Incidents vs Sporting Goods Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Babolat in 2026.

Incident History — Diadem Sports (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diadem Sports cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Babolat (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Babolat cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/diadem-sports.jpeg
Diadem Sports
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/babolat.jpeg
Babolat
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Babolat company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Diadem Sports company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Babolat company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Diadem Sports company.

In the current year, Babolat company and Diadem Sports company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Babolat company nor Diadem Sports company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Babolat company nor Diadem Sports company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Babolat company nor Diadem Sports company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Diadem Sports company nor Babolat company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Diadem Sports company nor Babolat company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Babolat company employs more people globally than Diadem Sports company, reflecting its scale as a Sporting Goods.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Diadem Sports nor Babolat holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References