
dhmi Company Cyber Security Posture
dhmi.gov.trTürkiye Havaalanlarının işletilmesi ile Türkiye Hava sahasındaki hava trafiğinin düzenlenmesi ve kontrolü görevi, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğünce yerine getirilmektedir. Türk Sivil Havacılık sektörünün altyapısını oluşturan tesis ve donanımıyla, 1933 yılından bu yana değişik isim ve statülerle hizmetlerini yürütmekte olan kuruluş, 233 Sayılı Kanun Hükmünde Kararname ve Ana Statüsü çerçevesinde 1984 yılından itibaren faaliyetlerini Kamu İktisadi Tesebbüsü olarak sürdürmektedir. Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğü; tüzel kişiliğe sahip, faaliyetlerinde özerk, sorumluluğu sermayesi ile sınırlı, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı ile ilgili ve en son hukuki düzenlemeyle hizmetleri imtiyaz sayılan bir Kamu İktisadi Kuruluşudur(KİK). Kuruluşun Ana Statüsü ile belirlenen amaç ve faaliyet konuları ise; Sivil havacılık faaliyetlerinin gereği olan hava taşımacılığı, havaalanlarının işletilmesi, meydan yer hizmetlerinin yapılması, hava trafik kontrol hizmetlerinin ifası, seyrüsefer sistem ve kolaylıklarının kurulması ve işletilmesi, bu faaliyetler ile ilgili diğer tesis ve sistemlerin kurulması, işletilmesi ve modern havacılık düzeyine çıkarılmasını sağlamak`tır. Üstlenmiş olduğu görevlerini Uluslararası sivil havacılık kural ve standartlarına göre yapmak zorunluluğunda olan DHMİ Genel Müdürlüğü bu doğrultuda; Uluslararası hava ulaşımında can ve mal emniyetini sağlamak ve düzenli ekonomik çalışma ve gelişmeyi temin maksadıyla yürürlüğe konulan Sivil Havacılık Anlaşmasına göre kurulan "Uluslararası Sivil Havacılık Teşkilatı(ICAO-International Civil Aviation Organization)`nın üyesi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, "Hava Seyrüseferinin Emniyeti için Avrupa Teşkilatı(EUROCONTROL)", Uluslararası Havaalanları Konseyi (ACI-Airports Council International) başta olmak üzere ilgili Uluslararası kuruluşların da üyesi bulunmaktadır.
dhmi Company Details
dhmi
10,001+ employees
0
481
Airlines and Aviation
dhmi.gov.tr
Scan still pending
DHM_2606055
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

dhmi Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
dhmi Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|
dhmi Company Subsidiaries

Türkiye Havaalanlarının işletilmesi ile Türkiye Hava sahasındaki hava trafiğinin düzenlenmesi ve kontrolü görevi, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğünce yerine getirilmektedir. Türk Sivil Havacılık sektörünün altyapısını oluşturan tesis ve donanımıyla, 1933 yılından bu yana değişik isim ve statülerle hizmetlerini yürütmekte olan kuruluş, 233 Sayılı Kanun Hükmünde Kararname ve Ana Statüsü çerçevesinde 1984 yılından itibaren faaliyetlerini Kamu İktisadi Tesebbüsü olarak sürdürmektedir. Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğü; tüzel kişiliğe sahip, faaliyetlerinde özerk, sorumluluğu sermayesi ile sınırlı, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı ile ilgili ve en son hukuki düzenlemeyle hizmetleri imtiyaz sayılan bir Kamu İktisadi Kuruluşudur(KİK). Kuruluşun Ana Statüsü ile belirlenen amaç ve faaliyet konuları ise; Sivil havacılık faaliyetlerinin gereği olan hava taşımacılığı, havaalanlarının işletilmesi, meydan yer hizmetlerinin yapılması, hava trafik kontrol hizmetlerinin ifası, seyrüsefer sistem ve kolaylıklarının kurulması ve işletilmesi, bu faaliyetler ile ilgili diğer tesis ve sistemlerin kurulması, işletilmesi ve modern havacılık düzeyine çıkarılmasını sağlamak`tır. Üstlenmiş olduğu görevlerini Uluslararası sivil havacılık kural ve standartlarına göre yapmak zorunluluğunda olan DHMİ Genel Müdürlüğü bu doğrultuda; Uluslararası hava ulaşımında can ve mal emniyetini sağlamak ve düzenli ekonomik çalışma ve gelişmeyi temin maksadıyla yürürlüğe konulan Sivil Havacılık Anlaşmasına göre kurulan "Uluslararası Sivil Havacılık Teşkilatı(ICAO-International Civil Aviation Organization)`nın üyesi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, "Hava Seyrüseferinin Emniyeti için Avrupa Teşkilatı(EUROCONTROL)", Uluslararası Havaalanları Konseyi (ACI-Airports Council International) başta olmak üzere ilgili Uluslararası kuruluşların da üyesi bulunmaktadır.
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
dhmi Cyber Security News
Hackers Can Use HDMI Cables to Capture Your Passwords
Researchers have discovered a new way that hackers can steal sensitive information, like passwords. This involves eavesdropping on HDMI cables.
Cyberstalkers can hack into HDMI ports – FIU researchers are studying a way to detect these attacks
If a hacker can access an unsecured HDMI-device, they could inject malicious commands to make the device do things it's not supposed to do, ...
AI can snoop on your computer screen using signals leaking from HDMI cables — researchers develop new AI model that enables using antennas for long-range attacks
Researchers in Uruguay have uncovered a way for hackers to use AI to snoop on what's shown on your display by intercepting leaked ...
Hackers Can Watch Your Screen Through This New Technique, Researchers Warn
Researchers published a new paper detailing how hackers can read your screen. With wireless electromagnetic radiation from the HDMI cable, spying becomes ...
HDMI Firewall Protects Your Display Port (but Not your DisplayPort)
The HDMI firewall is little more than a physical dongle that can be directly connected to the HDMI port you want to secure. It works by blocking ...

dhmi Similar Companies

Lufthansa Group
The Lufthansa Group is an aviation company with operations worldwide. It plays a leading role in its European home market. With 109,509 employees, the Lufthansa Group generated revenue of EUR 32.770m in the financial year 2022. The Passenger Airlines segment includes, on the one hand, the network a

GOL Linhas Aéreas
Somos a maior Companhia Aérea do País e estamos entre as que mais crescem no mundo. A nossa história começou em 2001 e, desde então, somos responsáveis por inovar o mercado da aviação no Brasil. Tudo isso graças à dedicação do nosso Time para garantir o nosso Valor número 1, a Segurança, entregand

Air Canada
Canada's largest airline, the country’s flag carrier and a founding member of Star Alliance, the world's most comprehensive air transportation network celebrating its 25thanniversary in 2022, Air Canada provides scheduled passenger service directly to 51 airports in Canada, 51 in the United States a

Groupe ADP
Le Groupe ADP construit, aménage et exploite des plates-formes aéroportuaires de manière responsable et à travers le monde, parmi lesquelles Paris-Charles de Gaulle, Paris-Orly et Paris-Le Bourget. En 2023, le groupe a accueilli sous sa marque Paris Aéroport 99,7 millions de passagers sur Pari

KLM Royal Dutch Airlines
Welcome to our LinkedIn page! KLM was founded in 1919 and is the oldest airline in the world. With a vast network of European and intercontinental destinations, KLM can offer direct flights to major cities and economic centres all over the world. Through our LinkedIn account, we make sure you are

LATAM Airlines
We are the leading airline in South America with the largest destinations, frequencies and aircraft fleet offer. We have the largest network of domestic destinations in five South American markets: Brazil, Chile, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru, and international operations in Latin America, Europe, the

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
dhmi CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, dhmi has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, dhmi has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Türkiye Havaalanlarının işletilmesi ile Türkiye Hava sahasındaki hava trafiğinin düzenlenmesi ve kontrolü görevi, Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğünce yerine getirilmektedir. Türk Sivil Havacılık sektörünün altyapısını oluşturan tesis ve donanımıyla, 1933 yılından bu yana değişik isim ve statülerle hizmetlerini yürütmekte olan kuruluş, 233 Sayılı Kanun Hükmünde Kararname ve Ana Statüsü çerçevesinde 1984 yılından itibaren faaliyetlerini Kamu İktisadi Tesebbüsü olarak sürdürmektedir. Devlet Hava Meydanları İşletmesi(DHMİ) Genel Müdürlüğü; tüzel kişiliğe sahip, faaliyetlerinde özerk, sorumluluğu sermayesi ile sınırlı, Ulaştırma Bakanlığı ile ilgili ve en son hukuki düzenlemeyle hizmetleri imtiyaz sayılan bir Kamu İktisadi Kuruluşudur(KİK). Kuruluşun Ana Statüsü ile belirlenen amaç ve faaliyet konuları ise; Sivil havacılık faaliyetlerinin gereği olan hava taşımacılığı, havaalanlarının işletilmesi, meydan yer hizmetlerinin yapılması, hava trafik kontrol hizmetlerinin ifası, seyrüsefer sistem ve kolaylıklarının kurulması ve işletilmesi, bu faaliyetler ile ilgili diğer tesis ve sistemlerin kurulması, işletilmesi ve modern havacılık düzeyine çıkarılmasını sağlamak`tır. Üstlenmiş olduğu görevlerini Uluslararası sivil havacılık kural ve standartlarına göre yapmak zorunluluğunda olan DHMİ Genel Müdürlüğü bu doğrultuda; Uluslararası hava ulaşımında can ve mal emniyetini sağlamak ve düzenli ekonomik çalışma ve gelişmeyi temin maksadıyla yürürlüğe konulan Sivil Havacılık Anlaşmasına göre kurulan "Uluslararası Sivil Havacılık Teşkilatı(ICAO-International Civil Aviation Organization)`nın üyesi bulunmaktadır. Ayrıca, "Hava Seyrüseferinin Emniyeti için Avrupa Teşkilatı(EUROCONTROL)", Uluslararası Havaalanları Konseyi (ACI-Airports Council International) başta olmak üzere ilgili Uluslararası kuruluşların da üyesi bulunmaktadır..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
