Comparison Overview

Delta Electronics

VS

Legrand

Delta Electronics

瑞光路, 內湖區, 114, TW
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deltaww.com

Delta is a global innovative provider of switching power supplies and DC brushless fans, as well as a major source for power management solutions, components, visual displays, industrial automation, networking products, and renewable energy solutions. Delta Group has sales offices worldwide and manufacturing plants in Taiwan, China, Thailand, Mexico, India and Europe. As a global innovator in power electronics, Delta's mission is, "To provide innovative, clean and efficient energy solutions for a better tomorrow."​ Delta is committed to environmental protection and has implemented green, lead-free production and waste management programs for many years.

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 16,020
Subsidiaries: 14
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
View Profile

Legrand

128 avenue du Marechal de Lattre de Tassigny, Limoges, FR, 87045
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://www.legrandgroup.com

Legrand is a global specialist in electrical and digital building infrastructures, dedicated to supporting technological, societal and environmental change around the globe. Our purpose is to improve lives by transforming the spaces where people live, work and meet by delivering electrical and digital infrastructures and connected solutions that are simple, innovative and sustainable. With nearly 38,000 employees around the world, we work hard every day to make the buildings of tomorrow more sustainable for everyone. Legrand reported sales of €8.3 billion in 2022. The company is listed on Euronext Paris and is notably a component stock of the CAC 40, CAC 40 ESG and CAC SBT 1.5 indexes. (code ISIN FR0010307819).

NAICS: 335
NAICS Definition: Electrical Equipment, Appliance, and Component Manufacturing
Employees: 11,700
Subsidiaries: 15
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-electronics.jpeg
Delta Electronics
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legrand.jpeg
Legrand
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Delta Electronics
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Legrand
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Delta Electronics has 12.28% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Legrand in 2026.

Incident History — Delta Electronics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Delta Electronics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Legrand (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Legrand cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/delta-electronics.jpeg
Delta Electronics
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized system access
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2022
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/legrand.jpeg
Legrand
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Legrand company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Delta Electronics company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Delta Electronics company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Legrand company has not reported any.

In the current year, Delta Electronics company has reported more cyber incidents than Legrand company.

Delta Electronics company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Legrand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Delta Electronics company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Legrand company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Legrand company nor Delta Electronics company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Delta Electronics company nor Legrand company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Legrand company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Delta Electronics company.

Delta Electronics company employs more people globally than Legrand company, reflecting its scale as a Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Delta Electronics nor Legrand holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References