Comparison Overview

DC37

VS

Homeless Advocacy Project

DC37

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dc37.net/benefits/freelegal.html

DC 37’s Health and Security benefit package includes the largest prepaid legal services office in the country. More than 65 staff lawyers offer legal advice and representation, and prepare legal documents for members on a wide range of civil legal matters. MELS lawyers work exclusively for the union. Social workers are also available to counsel you on case-related personal and family problems.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 256
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Homeless Advocacy Project

1429 Walnut Street, 15th Fl, Philadelphia, PA, US, 19102
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
https://haplegal.org/

The Homeless Advocacy Project (HAP) exists to meet the legal and advocacy needs of homeless individuals and families in Philadelphia. With a legal staff of 13 and a corps of 400 volunteer lawyers, paralegals, and law students, HAP engages in direct outreach to homeless individuals in need of legal services. Each year, HAP conducts 150 annual legal clinics at 25 shelters and soup kitchens located throughout the City. At these clinics, HAP's staff and volunteers meet and interview prospective clients, assess their legal needs, provide advice and referrals for services, and offer on-going legal representation and advocacy to those with more complex problems. HAP currently holds legal clinics at twenty-five homeless shelters and soup kitchens. HAP also makes educational presentations to shelter residents and service providers to inform them of benefits and services available for homeless people, and to empower individuals to obtain benefits and services for themselves. Through these efforts, HAP is often instrumental in helping homeless men and women obtain the access to shelter, income, and services they need to begin making their way to more secure, stable lives.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 28
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc37.jpeg
DC37
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homeless-advocacy-project.jpeg
Homeless Advocacy Project
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
DC37
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Homeless Advocacy Project
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for DC37 in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Homeless Advocacy Project in 2026.

Incident History — DC37 (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DC37 cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Homeless Advocacy Project (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Homeless Advocacy Project cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dc37.jpeg
DC37
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/homeless-advocacy-project.jpeg
Homeless Advocacy Project
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

DC37 company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Homeless Advocacy Project company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Homeless Advocacy Project company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to DC37 company.

In the current year, Homeless Advocacy Project company and DC37 company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Homeless Advocacy Project company nor DC37 company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Homeless Advocacy Project company nor DC37 company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Homeless Advocacy Project company nor DC37 company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither DC37 company nor Homeless Advocacy Project company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither DC37 company nor Homeless Advocacy Project company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

DC37 company employs more people globally than Homeless Advocacy Project company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds HIPAA certification.

Neither DC37 nor Homeless Advocacy Project holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References