Comparison Overview

David Landa Stewart Lawyers

VS

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.

David Landa Stewart Lawyers

47-49 Murray St, Pyrmont, 2009, AU
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.dls-lawyers.com

David Landa Stewart is a Sydney based legal firm which was established in 1927. We provide services in a broad range of practice areas including commercial law, land tax, litigation, conveyancing (both residential and commercial) and wills and estate planning law. We pride ourselves on the quality of our legal services. We aim for the highest service levels and professionalism. Clients maintain direct contact with the lawyer handling their matter. Our clients include: Public and private companies; Financial institutions; Public and private trusts; Family run enterprises; and Individuals. We have many longstanding client relationships of which we are extremely proud.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 14
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.

400 Garden City Plaza, Garden City, New York, 11530, US
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ssmp.com

Since its founding more than 45 years ago, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. has become well known for its successful patent prosecution practice. It has an unmatched reputation for delivering value to its clients in procuring strong patents and for delivering the highest level of client service. Less well known is that Scully Scott has been successfully litigating patent, trademark, trade secret and copyright disputes throughout its history.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/david-landa-stewart-lawyers.jpeg
David Landa Stewart Lawyers
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scully-scott-murphy-&-presser.jpeg
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
David Landa Stewart Lawyers
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for David Landa Stewart Lawyers in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. in 2026.

Incident History — David Landa Stewart Lawyers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

David Landa Stewart Lawyers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/david-landa-stewart-lawyers.jpeg
David Landa Stewart Lawyers
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/scully-scott-murphy-&-presser.jpeg
Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to David Landa Stewart Lawyers company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to David Landa Stewart Lawyers company.

In the current year, Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company and David Landa Stewart Lawyers company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company nor David Landa Stewart Lawyers company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company nor David Landa Stewart Lawyers company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company nor David Landa Stewart Lawyers company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers company nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers company nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. company employs more people globally than David Landa Stewart Lawyers company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither David Landa Stewart Lawyers nor Scully, Scott, Murphy & Presser, P.C. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References