Comparison Overview

Danfoss

VS

Rencol Components Ltd.

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machinery, automotive, marine, and off- and on-highway equipment. We also provide solutions for renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, as well as district-energy infrastructure for cities. Our innovative engineering dates back to 1933. Danfoss is family-owned, employing more than 39,000 people, serving customers in more than 100 countries through a global footprint of 100 factories. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook: www.instagram.com/danfoss_group www.twitter.com/Danfoss www.facebook.com/Danfoss

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 22,778
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Rencol Components Ltd.

Unit 2, Avonbridge Trading Estate, Bristol, BS11 9QD, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849

Following 100 years of successful design and manufacturing experience in plastic and metals, Rencol Components has built a truly global supply chain - rapidly expanding our range of high-quality, competitively-priced industrial components. Rencol has developed a mature and efficient Supply Chain with English-speaking personnel specialising in design, engineering, quality and logistics. Our permanent quality and engineering personnel work closely with all manufacturing facilities. We leverage the latest advances in communications and information technology to integrate our Component Sourcing, Management, and Sales & Product Development teams in Shanghai (China), New York (USA), and Bristol (UK), respectively. Specialties: Custom manufacturing, plastic injection moulding, die casting, forging, machining, metal stamping, tooling and sub assemblies. Far East product sourcing, China manufacturing facilities. Global supply chain network.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 11,548
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rencol-components-ltd.jpeg
Rencol Components Ltd.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Danfoss
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Rencol Components Ltd.
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Danfoss has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Rencol Components Ltd. in 2026.

Incident History — Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Rencol Components Ltd. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Rencol Components Ltd. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/rencol-components-ltd.jpeg
Rencol Components Ltd.
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Rencol Components Ltd. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Danfoss company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Danfoss company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Rencol Components Ltd. company has not reported any.

In the current year, Danfoss company has reported more cyber incidents than Rencol Components Ltd. company.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. company nor Danfoss company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Rencol Components Ltd. company nor Danfoss company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Danfoss company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Rencol Components Ltd. company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Danfoss company nor Rencol Components Ltd. company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danfoss company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Rencol Components Ltd. company.

Danfoss company employs more people globally than Rencol Components Ltd. company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Danfoss nor Rencol Components Ltd. holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H