Crédit Agricole Italia Company Cyber Security Posture
credit-agricole.itCrédit Agricole Italia fa parte del grande Gruppo internazionale Crédit Agricole: un gruppo bancario tra i più solidi nel panorama internazionale e presente in 46 Paesi del mondo, con 53 milioni di Clienti. Il Gruppo Crédit Agricole in Italia conta 6 milioni di Clienti attivi e circa 16.200 collaboratori. Internazionalità, affidabilità, vicinanza e concretezza sono i valori del Gruppo. - FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/CreditAgricoleItalia/ @CreditAgricoleItalia - X https://twitter.com/CA_Ita @CA_Ita - INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/creditagricoleitalia/ @creditagricoleitalia - YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/creditagricoleitalia -TIK TOK tiktok.com/@creditagricoleitalia @creditagricoleitalia - TUTORED https://www.tutored.me/it/employers/478113/ - INDEED https://it.indeed.com/cmp/Cr%C3%A9dit-Agricole-1
CAI Company Details
creditagricoleitalia
10,001+ employees
149642
522
Banking
credit-agricole.it
Scan still pending
CRÉ_3422855
In-progress
CAI Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
CAI Global Score.png)
Crédit Agricole Italia Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Crédit Agricole Italia Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Crédit Agricole Italia Company Subsidiaries
Crédit Agricole Italia fa parte del grande Gruppo internazionale Crédit Agricole: un gruppo bancario tra i più solidi nel panorama internazionale e presente in 46 Paesi del mondo, con 53 milioni di Clienti. Il Gruppo Crédit Agricole in Italia conta 6 milioni di Clienti attivi e circa 16.200 collaboratori. Internazionalità, affidabilità, vicinanza e concretezza sono i valori del Gruppo. - FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/CreditAgricoleItalia/ @CreditAgricoleItalia - X https://twitter.com/CA_Ita @CA_Ita - INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/creditagricoleitalia/ @creditagricoleitalia - YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/creditagricoleitalia -TIK TOK tiktok.com/@creditagricoleitalia @creditagricoleitalia - TUTORED https://www.tutored.me/it/employers/478113/ - INDEED https://it.indeed.com/cmp/Cr%C3%A9dit-Agricole-1
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
CAI Cyber Security News
Credit Agricole not a protagonist of Italy's bank M&A wave, country chairman says
Credit Agricole Italy won't play a leading role in the current M&A wave sweeping the country's financial sector, its chairman said, ...
Italy: Crédit Agricole Italia Not a Key Player in Bank M&A Wave, Says CEO
Crédit Agricole Italia is the main investor in Banco BPM, its key business partner in Italy, and has increased its stake following UniCredit's ...
Exclusive: Italy informally backed Credit Agricole's higher BPM stake, sources say
France's Credit Agricole had informal backing from the Italian government before it said on Friday it was raising its stake in Banco BPM ...
Crédit Agricole lifts stake in Italy’s Banco BPM in blow to UniCredit bid
France's Crédit Agricole has boosted its stake in Banco BPM in a move that will complicate UniCredit's approach for the Italian lender.
Bank of Italy - I Navigati - A new cybersecurity awareness campaign
A new cybersecurity awareness campaign has been launched, thanks to the efforts of institutions and the banking, financial and insurance ...
Crédit Agricole moves to increase stake in Italy’s Banco BPM
French retail bank Crédit Agricole has entered into financial instruments pertaining to 5.2% of Banco BPM's share capital, helping it raise ...
Credit Agricole vows to defend Italian interests after strong end to 2024
Credit Agricole (CAGR.PA) has vowed to defend its interests in Italy, with outgoing CEO Philippe Brassac saying the French bank had no plans to buy Banco BPM.
European stocks extend losing streak as global tech outage disrupts key sectors
Producer prices in Germany decline due to lower energy costs · European stocks extend losing streak as global tech outage disrupts key sectors.
Enforcement Actions: Banking, Other Financial Products and Services
The Department of Financial Services supervises many different types of institutions. Supervision by DFS may entail chartering, licensing, ...
CAI Similar Companies
China Everbright Bank
Established in August 1992, China Everbright Bank (hereafter "the Bank") is headquartered in Beijing and is a financial institution that is founded under the approval of the State Council and the People's Bank of China. Since its inception, the Bank has been implementing a client-centered and market
Bandhan Bank
Started as a universal bank on August 23, 2015, Bandhan Bank is one of India’s fastest-growing private sector banks. Bandhan Bank has always been committed to financial inclusion and aims to serve the underserved. Guided by the principle of ‘Aapka Bhala, Sabki Bhalai,’ the Bank is dedicated not only
RBC
Royal Bank of Canada is a global financial institution with a purpose-driven, principles-led approach to delivering leading performance. Our success comes from the 94,000+ employees who leverage their imaginations and insights to bring our vision, values and strategy to life so we can help our clien
Evergrowing Bank
Evergrowing Banking was established on 2003 after joint-stock system reform, now it has grown to a famous national joint-stock bank. The heaquarter of the bank is in city of Yantai, Shandong Province, with 11 tier-one branches in Qingdao, Jinan, Hangzhou, Chengdu, Chongqing, Yantai, Fuzhou, Kunming
Central Bank of Nigeria
The mandate of the Central Bank of Nigeria (CBN) is derived from the 1958 Act of Parliament, as amended in 1991, 1993,1997,1998,1999 and 2007. The CBN Act of 2007 of the Federal Republic of Nigeria charges the Bank with the overall control and administration of the monetary and financial sector pol
QNB Türkiye
Finansbank A.Ş. 26 Ekim 1987 tarihinde iş insanı Hüsnü Özyeğin liderliğinde 100 ortakla Bankalar Kanunu ve Türk Ticaret Kanunu hükümleri uyarınca kuruldu. Sektörde hızlı büyeme ile ilk 5 büyük özel banka arasına giren QNB Finansbank, 2006 yılında Yunanistan'ın en büyük bankası National Bank of Greec
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
CAI CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, CAI has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, CAI has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Crédit Agricole Italia fa parte del grande Gruppo internazionale Crédit Agricole: un gruppo bancario tra i più solidi nel panorama internazionale e presente in 46 Paesi del mondo, con 53 milioni di Clienti. Il Gruppo Crédit Agricole in Italia conta 6 milioni di Clienti attivi e circa 16.200 collaboratori. Internazionalità, affidabilità, vicinanza e concretezza sono i valori del Gruppo. - FACEBOOK https://www.facebook.com/CreditAgricoleItalia/ @CreditAgricoleItalia - X https://twitter.com/CA_Ita @CA_Ita - INSTAGRAM https://www.instagram.com/creditagricoleitalia/ @creditagricoleitalia - YOUTUBE https://www.youtube.com/creditagricoleitalia -TIK TOK tiktok.com/@creditagricoleitalia @creditagricoleitalia - TUTORED https://www.tutored.me/it/employers/478113/ - INDEED https://it.indeed.com/cmp/Cr%C3%A9dit-Agricole-1.
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
