Comparison Overview

Coty

VS

Natura

Coty

Buitenveldertselaan 3-5, Amsterdam, 1082, NL
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Since 1904, Coty has fearlessly pioneered innovation across the beauty industry. We have a reputation for breaking new ground; a history of ‘firsts’ and ‘bests’ that has laid the foundation for the industry as we know it today. For over a century, our brands have been empowering people to express themselves and create their own vision of beauty. It’s a legacy we’re proud to own and grow. We work hand-in-hand with our people, our partners and our customers. Together, we unleash every vision of beauty. We stand for the beauty of diversity and the diversity of beauty - celebrating and inspiring all the expressions of beauty that exist and that will exist. We honor you, and we honor our planet. We create Beauty That Lasts. A beauty that is both good to people and the world. Our mission is to create a forward thinking beauty; Products that provide new, innovative and simply better science based solutions. Let’s keep making over the beauty world TOGETHER.

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 12,568
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Natura

Av. Alexandre Colares, 1.188, Vila Jaguara, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05106-0000
Last Update: 2026-03-28
Between 800 and 849

Founded in 1969, Natura is a Brazilian multinational in the cosmetics and personal care segment, a leader in direct sales in Brazil, and recognized for protecting the Amazon social biodiversity through its sustainable business model. Cruelty free. 100% vegan. With 7,000 employees and 2 million beauty Consultants worldwide, Natura operates in 11 countries. In 2014, Natura became the first publicly traded company to receive B Corp ™ certification, and its third certification was concluded in 2020. Natura’s Ekos line is certified by the Union for Ethical Biotrade (UEBT). Learn more: natura.com

NAICS: 32562
NAICS Definition: Toilet Preparation Manufacturing
Employees: 47,474
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Coty
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Natura
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Coty in 2026.

Incidents vs Personal Care Product Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Natura in 2026.

Incident History — Coty (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Coty cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Natura (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Natura cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/coty.jpeg
Coty
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Phishing
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/natura.jpeg
Natura
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Natura company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Coty company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Coty company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Natura company has not reported any.

In the current year, Natura company and Coty company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Natura company nor Coty company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Coty company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Natura company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Natura company nor Coty company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Coty company nor Natura company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Coty company nor Natura company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Natura company employs more people globally than Coty company, reflecting its scale as a Personal Care Product Manufacturing.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Coty nor Natura holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H