Comparison Overview

Cota Cole LLP

VS

McFarland PLLC

Cota Cole LLP

2661 Lava Ridge Court, Roseville, CA, 95661, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cotalawfirm.com

Cota Cole LLP is a law firm founded on a commitment to excellence. Our comprehensive public and private law practice provides our clients with the extensive experience of skilled attorneys with a proven record of success. With decades of experience and the energy and enthusiasm of a growing and dynamic legal team, Cota Cole LLP provides personalized service and achieves superior results. Cota Cole LLP attorneys advise and represent clients in matters involving litigation, municipal law, environmental law, and estate planning. We represent both public and private clients, and have practiced in courtrooms and board chambers throughout the state. From our two strategically located offices in Northern California and the Central Valley, we offer clients well reasoned and practical advice, solutions and representation, along with personalized attention to individual needs and goals. At Cota Cole LLP we build long-term relationships with clients by providing timely, accurate, and cost-effective representation.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

McFarland PLLC

811 Louisiana St., Suite 2520, Houston, TX, 77002, US
Last Update: 2026-03-07
Between 750 and 799
http://mcfarlandpllc.com

Trial lawyers focusing on eminent domain, condemnation, and valuation litigation. McFarland PLLC represents property owners in maximizing compensation when governmental or public-use entities attempt to take private property for public use. While our experience has included takings projects for highway expansion, pipelines, electric transmission lines, and flood control, our principal practice is focused on highway and roadway widening projects impacting retail, commercial, industrial, and special-use properties. Firm founder Charles McFarland has been selected by his peers for inclusion in The Best Lawyers in America® in the practice area of Eminent Domain and Condemnation Law and Texas Super Lawyers for Eminent Domain. Charles additionally has the AV Preeminent Rating, Martindale-Hubbell's highest possible rating for both ethical standards and legal ability.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 29
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cota-cole-llp.jpeg
Cota Cole LLP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cota Cole LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McFarland PLLC
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cota Cole LLP in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McFarland PLLC in 2026.

Incident History — Cota Cole LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cota Cole LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McFarland PLLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McFarland PLLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cota-cole-llp.jpeg
Cota Cole LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcfarland-pllc.jpeg
McFarland PLLC
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cota Cole LLP company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McFarland PLLC company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, McFarland PLLC company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cota Cole LLP company.

In the current year, McFarland PLLC company and Cota Cole LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor Cota Cole LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor Cota Cole LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither McFarland PLLC company nor Cota Cole LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cota Cole LLP company nor McFarland PLLC company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cota Cole LLP company nor McFarland PLLC company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

McFarland PLLC company employs more people globally than Cota Cole LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cota Cole LLP nor McFarland PLLC holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References