Comparison Overview

Correos

VS

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

Correos

Calle del Conde de Peñalver, 19, Madrid, 28006, ES
Last Update: 2026-04-02
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.correos.es

Somos la empresa líder en comunicaciones físicas, digitales y de paquetería. Nuestra misión es prestar un servicio integral de calidad, ofreciendo soluciones y servicios en toda la cadena de valor del ecommerce con el objetivo de facilitar la vida a nuestros clientes. Distribuimos más de 5.100 millones de envíos al año y llegamos a 19 millones de hogares y dos millones de empresas. Somos la primera empresa del país por capilaridad y cobertura territorial, con más de 10.000 puntos de acceso a nuestros servicios: 2.200 oficinas multiservicio, 100 unidades de servicios especiales 1.821 unidades de distribución y 7.676 puntos de servicio en el ámbito rural (atención al cliente y/o reparto). Y, sobre todo, somos la empresa con mayor número de personas al servicio de personas. Más de 65.000 profesionales trabajando para que Correos sea cada día una empresa más moderna, eficiente y competitiva.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 13,714
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Pacific Gas and Electric Company

300 Lakeside Dr, Oakland, California, US, 94612
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
http://www.pge.com

Pacific Gas and Electric Company, incorporated in California in 1905, is one of the largest combination natural gas and electric utilities in the United States. Based in San Francisco, the company is a subsidiary of PG&E Corporation. There are approximately 20,000 employees who carry out Pacific Gas and Electric Company's primary business—the transmission and delivery of energy. The company provides natural gas and electric service to approximately 15 million people throughout a 70,000-square-mile service area in northern and central California. Fast Facts * Service area stretches from Eureka in the north to Bakersfield in the south, and from the Pacific Ocean in the west to the Sierra Nevada in the east * 141,215 circuit miles of electric distribution lines and 18,616 circuit miles of interconnected transmission lines * 42,141 miles of natural gas distribution pipelines and 6,438 miles of transportation pipelines * 5.1 million electric customer accounts * 4.3 million natural gas customer accounts

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 23,111
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correos.jpeg
Correos
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Correos
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Correos in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pacific Gas and Electric Company in 2026.

Incident History — Correos (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Correos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pacific Gas and Electric Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pacific Gas and Electric Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/correos.jpeg
Correos
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2022
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial gain
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pacificgasandelectric.jpeg
Pacific Gas and Electric Company
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2016
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Database Exposure
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Correos company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Correos and Pacific Gas and Electric Company have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Pacific Gas and Electric Company company and Correos company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company company nor Correos company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Correos company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Pacific Gas and Electric Company company nor Correos company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Correos company nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Correos company.

Pacific Gas and Electric Company company employs more people globally than Correos company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Correos nor Pacific Gas and Electric Company holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References