Département des Alpes Maritimes Company Cyber Security Posture
departement06.frLa répartition des compétences entre les collectivités locales est définie par les lois de décentralisation successives depuis 1982. Les grands domaines de l’exécutif départemental : - Action sociale : protection de l'enfance, insertion des personnes en difficulté, RSA, aide aux personnes handicapées et aux personnes âgées, prévention sanitaire ; - Infrastructures : gestion des routes départementales ; - Transports : transports des voyageurs sur les réseaux interurbains, transports scolaires ; - Éducation : gestion matérielle des collèges ; - Culture : archives départementales, bibliothèque départementale de prêt, musées ; - Développement local : aides aux associations, aux communes, tourisme, agriculture. La loi du 13 août 2004 relative aux libertés et responsabilités locales (acte II de la décentralisation) a engagé une nouvelle vague de décentralisation. Le Conseil général s’est vu à cette occasion attribuer de nouvelles compétences en matière de : - Action sociale : programmes de santé ; - Transport : gestion du réseau routier national transféré en grande partie (devenu réseau routier départemental ou national d'intérêt local) ; - Logement : gestion du fonds de solidarité pour le logement (FSL) ; - Éducation : recrutement et gestion des personnels techniques, ouvriers et de services (TOS) ainsi que la restauration scolaire des collèges ; - Culture : transfert de certains domaines patrimoniaux, schémas départementaux des enseignements artistiques. Mais au-delà de ce cadre législatif, pour coller à la réalité des territoires et aux besoins des habitants, le Conseil général des Alpes-Maritimes a opté pour une démarche volontariste en se saisissant de domaines facultatifs tels que l’emploi et l’économie, l’environnement, l’aménagement du territoire, le sport, la création et la diffusion culturelle.
DDAM Company Details
conseil-g-n-ral-des-alpes-maritimes
1069 employees
18690198239132004
none
Administration publique
departement06.fr
Scan still pending
DÉP_1275919
In-progress
DDAM Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 200 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
DDAM Global Score.png)
Département des Alpes Maritimes Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 200 and 800 |
Département des Alpes Maritimes Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Département des alpes maritimes | Cyber Attack | 100 | 6 | 11/2022 | DPA02221222 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: The Départment des Alpes-Maritimes was forced to cut all IT networks to “protect sensitive data” as it was targeted in a cyberattack. The responsiveness of Alpes-Maritimes’ digital services department and its crisis management team prevented the data from being hacked. Although the overall diagnosis of the attack, the responsiveness of the actions taken ensured there was no piracy of community data. | |||||||
Département des Alpes Maritimes Company Subsidiaries
La répartition des compétences entre les collectivités locales est définie par les lois de décentralisation successives depuis 1982. Les grands domaines de l’exécutif départemental : - Action sociale : protection de l'enfance, insertion des personnes en difficulté, RSA, aide aux personnes handicapées et aux personnes âgées, prévention sanitaire ; - Infrastructures : gestion des routes départementales ; - Transports : transports des voyageurs sur les réseaux interurbains, transports scolaires ; - Éducation : gestion matérielle des collèges ; - Culture : archives départementales, bibliothèque départementale de prêt, musées ; - Développement local : aides aux associations, aux communes, tourisme, agriculture. La loi du 13 août 2004 relative aux libertés et responsabilités locales (acte II de la décentralisation) a engagé une nouvelle vague de décentralisation. Le Conseil général s’est vu à cette occasion attribuer de nouvelles compétences en matière de : - Action sociale : programmes de santé ; - Transport : gestion du réseau routier national transféré en grande partie (devenu réseau routier départemental ou national d'intérêt local) ; - Logement : gestion du fonds de solidarité pour le logement (FSL) ; - Éducation : recrutement et gestion des personnels techniques, ouvriers et de services (TOS) ainsi que la restauration scolaire des collèges ; - Culture : transfert de certains domaines patrimoniaux, schémas départementaux des enseignements artistiques. Mais au-delà de ce cadre législatif, pour coller à la réalité des territoires et aux besoins des habitants, le Conseil général des Alpes-Maritimes a opté pour une démarche volontariste en se saisissant de domaines facultatifs tels que l’emploi et l’économie, l’environnement, l’aménagement du territoire, le sport, la création et la diffusion culturelle.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
DDAM Cyber Security News
New executive order targets federal cybersecurity gaps
The latest cybersecurity order sets some new standards and direction, but it also goes back and makes changes to Biden-era executive orders. If ...
CrowdStrike, Cloudflare Stock Cashing In As Cybersecurity Needs Grow
CrowdStrike stock reached a new high after a breaking out of a base. Cybersecurity name Cloudflare and two others produce big gains.
Vermont’s Dual-Enrollment Cybersecurity Certificate
A Vermont partnership gives high school students hands-on experience in cybersecurity and a conditional acceptance to a local college.
Germany seeks deeper partnership with Israel on cybersecurity
Germany plans to strengthen its cybersecurity collaboration with Israel and establish a joint cyber research center following the recent ...
Cybersecurity company CrowdStrike moving its 'strategic technology hub' into new Redmond space
CrowdStrike is moving into new office space in Redmond, Wash., the cybersecurity software company confirmed on Wednesday. The company is ...
Critical Sudo Vulnerabilities Let Local Users Gain Root Access on Linux, Impacting Major Distros
Two critical vulnerabilities in Sudo command-line tool allow privilege escalation for local attackers on Linux systems.
Cybersecurity M&A Roundup: 41 Deals Announced in June 2025
Forty-one cybersecurity merger and acquisition (M&A) deals were announced in June 2025 and added to SecurityWeek tracker.
Mastercard Launches Program to Support Cybersecurity Startups
Mastercard has expanded its startup engagement program with a focus on cybersecurity, fraud mitigation and payment resiliency.
Cybersecurity essentials for the future: From hype to what works
Discover actionable cybersecurity essentials to boost visibility, reduce risk, strengthen controls, align security with business outcomes.
DDAM Similar Companies
France Travail
France Travail est un acteur majeur du marché de l’emploi en France où il s’investit pour faciliter le retour à l’emploi des demandeurs d’emploi et offrir aux entreprises des réponses adaptées à leurs besoins de recrutement. Les 55 000 collaborateurs de France Travail œuvrent au quotidien pour êtr
Ministère de l'Éducation nationale
Page officielle du ministère de l'Éducation nationale, de l'Enseignement supérieur et de la Recherche. Retrouvez toute l'information sur www.education.gouv.fr, twitter.com/education_gouv, facebook.com/education.gouv et dans nos lettres d'informations (bulletin hebdo et lettre education.gouv.fr). ---
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
DDAM CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, DDAM has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Cyber Attack'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as La répartition des compétences entre les collectivités locales est définie par les lois de décentralisation successives depuis 1982. Les grands domaines de l’exécutif départemental : - Action sociale : protection de l'enfance, insertion des personnes en difficulté, RSA, aide aux personnes handicapées et aux personnes âgées, prévention sanitaire ; - Infrastructures : gestion des routes départementales ; - Transports : transports des voyageurs sur les réseaux interurbains, transports scolaires ; - Éducation : gestion matérielle des collèges ; - Culture : archives départementales, bibliothèque départementale de prêt, musées ; - Développement local : aides aux associations, aux communes, tourisme, agriculture. La loi du 13 août 2004 relative aux libertés et responsabilités locales (acte II de la décentralisation) a engagé une nouvelle vague de décentralisation. Le Conseil général s’est vu à cette occasion attribuer de nouvelles compétences en matière de : - Action sociale : programmes de santé ; - Transport : gestion du réseau routier national transféré en grande partie (devenu réseau routier départemental ou national d'intérêt local) ; - Logement : gestion du fonds de solidarité pour le logement (FSL) ; - Éducation : recrutement et gestion des personnels techniques, ouvriers et de services (TOS) ainsi que la restauration scolaire des collèges ; - Culture : transfert de certains domaines patrimoniaux, schémas départementaux des enseignements artistiques. Mais au-delà de ce cadre législatif, pour coller à la réalité des territoires et aux besoins des habitants, le Conseil général des Alpes-Maritimes a opté pour une démarche volontariste en se saisissant de domaines facultatifs tels que l’emploi et l’économie, l’environnement, l’aménagement du territoire, le sport, la création et la diffusion culturelle..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
