Comparison Overview

Community Health Systems

VS

Molina Healthcare

Community Health Systems

4000 Meridian Boulevard, Franklin, 37067, US
Last Update: 2026-03-29
Between 650 and 699

Community Health Systems is one of the nation’s leading healthcare providers. Developing and operating healthcare delivery systems across 14 states, CHS is committed to helping people get well and live healthier. CHS affiliates operate 70 acute-care hospitals and more than 1,000 other sites of care, including physician practices, urgent care centers, freestanding emergency departments, occupational medicine clinics, imaging centers, cancer centers and ambulatory surgery centers.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 24,576
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Molina Healthcare

200 Oceangate, Long Beach, 90802, US
Last Update: 2026-03-30

Molina Healthcare is a FORTUNE 500 company that is focused exclusively on government-sponsored health care programs for families and individuals who qualify for government sponsored health care. Molina Healthcare contracts with state governments and serves as a health plan providing a wide range of quality health care services to families and individuals. Molina Healthcare offers health plans in Arizona, California, Florida, Idaho, Illinois, Kentucky, Massachusetts, Michigan, Mississippi, Nevada, New Mexico, New York, Ohio, South Carolina, Texas, Utah, Virginia, Washington and Wisconsin. Molina also offers a Medicare product and has been selected in several states to participate in duals demonstration projects to manage the care for those eligible for both Medicaid and Medicare.

NAICS: 62
NAICS Definition: Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees: 17,475
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-health-systems.jpeg
Community Health Systems
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/molina-healthcare.jpeg
Molina Healthcare
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Community Health Systems
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Molina Healthcare
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Community Health Systems in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Molina Healthcare in 2026.

Incident History — Community Health Systems (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Community Health Systems cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Molina Healthcare (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Molina Healthcare cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/community-health-systems.jpeg
Community Health Systems
Incidents

Date Detected: 02/2023
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Zero-day vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 01/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2014
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: External Criminal Cyber Attack
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/molina-healthcare.jpeg
Molina Healthcare
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2017
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of a Security Flaw
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 3/2015
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Insider Threat
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Molina Healthcare company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Community Health Systems company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Community Health Systems company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Molina Healthcare company.

In the current year, Molina Healthcare company and Community Health Systems company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Molina Healthcare company nor Community Health Systems company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both Molina Healthcare company and Community Health Systems company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Community Health Systems company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Molina Healthcare company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Molina Healthcare company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Community Health Systems company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Molina Healthcare company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Community Health Systems company.

Community Health Systems company employs more people globally than Molina Healthcare company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitals and Health Care.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Community Health Systems nor Molina Healthcare holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was identified in Totolink A3300R 17.0.0cu.557_b20221024. This affects the function setLanCfg of the file /cgi-bin/cstecgi.cgi of the component Parameter Handler. The manipulation of the argument lanIp leads to command injection. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is publicly available and might be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Perl versions from 5.9.4 before 5.40.4-RC1, from 5.41.0 before 5.42.2-RC1, from 5.43.0 before 5.43.9 contain a vulnerable version of Compress::Raw::Zlib. Compress::Raw::Zlib is included in the Perl package as a dual-life core module, and is vulnerable to CVE-2026-3381 due to a vendored version of zlib which has several vulnerabilities, including CVE-2026-27171. The bundled Compress::Raw::Zlib was updated to version 2.221 in Perl blead commit c75ae9cc164205e1b6d6dbd57bd2c65c8593fe94.

Description

Ghidra versions prior to 12.0.3 improperly process annotation directives embedded in automatically extracted binary data, resulting in arbitrary command execution when an analyst interacts with the UI. Specifically, the @execute annotation (which is intended for trusted, user-authored comments) is also parsed in comments generated during auto-analysis (such as CFStrings in Mach-O binaries). This allows a crafted binary to present seemingly benign clickable text which, when clicked, executes attacker-controlled commands on the analyst’s machine.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

A critical security vulnerability in parisneo/lollms versions up to 2.2.0 allows any authenticated user to accept or reject friend requests belonging to other users. The `respond_request()` function in `backend/routers/friends.py` does not implement proper authorization checks, enabling Insecure Direct Object Reference (IDOR) attacks. Specifically, the `/api/friends/requests/{friendship_id}` endpoint fails to verify whether the authenticated user is part of the friendship or the intended recipient of the request. This vulnerability can lead to unauthorized access, privacy violations, and potential social engineering attacks. The issue has been addressed in version 2.2.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:L
Description

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in parisneo/lollms versions prior to 2.2.0, specifically in the `/api/files/export-content` endpoint. The `_download_image_to_temp()` function in `backend/routers/files.py` fails to validate user-controlled URLs, allowing attackers to make arbitrary HTTP requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. This vulnerability can lead to internal network access, cloud metadata access, information disclosure, port scanning, and potentially remote code execution.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N