Comparison Overview

Cogent Law Group LLP

VS

Albion Chambers

Cogent Law Group LLP

1875 K St NW, Washington, DC, 20006, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

Our Mission Cogent has assembled a group of senior attorneys who developed their deep expertise: representing clients at major law firms serving in senior government positions, and founding and leading tech and alternative currency startups. Our advice is rooted in entrepreneurial experience. We are energized by working with fast-growing clients. With our unique team and our low-overhead business model, Cogent delivers top-tier services without the big-law rates. We provide innovative solutions and look for opportunities to connect clients to our network of service providers, organizations, investors, and potential customers.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 22
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Albion Chambers

Albion Chambers, Broad Street, Bristol, None, GB, BS1 1DR
Last Update: 2026-04-03

Albion Chambers was established over 100 years ago and has an excellent reputation across the Western Circuit for integrity, approachability and the highest quality of advice and advocacy. Chambers is led by Richard English and has 71 barristers including three King’s Counsel. There are five door tenants, two of whom are King’s Counsel. Situated in Bristol and Taunton, Albion Chambers is very close to all local courts. We recognise the importance of high levels of service to our professional and lay clients. We were the first set of chambers in Bristol to be awarded Bar Mark, the Bar Council’s quality standard and are now proud to have been awarded the Legal Services commission’s standard; Quality Mark. Our teams of committed specialists practise throughout the South West, and beyond. They provide clear, strong, expeditious and practical advice and representation. Our highly skilled support staff offer friendly and efficient service to professional and lay clients.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-law-group-llp.jpeg
Cogent Law Group LLP
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albion-chambers.jpeg
Albion Chambers
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cogent Law Group LLP
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Albion Chambers
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cogent Law Group LLP in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Albion Chambers in 2026.

Incident History — Cogent Law Group LLP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cogent Law Group LLP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Albion Chambers (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Albion Chambers cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cogent-law-group-llp.jpeg
Cogent Law Group LLP
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/albion-chambers.jpeg
Albion Chambers
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both Cogent Law Group LLP company and Albion Chambers company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Albion Chambers company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cogent Law Group LLP company.

In the current year, Albion Chambers company and Cogent Law Group LLP company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Albion Chambers company nor Cogent Law Group LLP company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Albion Chambers company nor Cogent Law Group LLP company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Albion Chambers company nor Cogent Law Group LLP company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP company nor Albion Chambers company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP company nor Albion Chambers company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Albion Chambers company employs more people globally than Cogent Law Group LLP company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cogent Law Group LLP nor Albion Chambers holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.