COFCO Corporation Company Cyber Security Posture
cofco.comFounded in 1949, COFCO is one of the 53 pillar enterprises under direct administration of the State Council. With years of endeavor, COFCO has developed from a solely trading company of grain and oils into the largest supplier of diversified products and services in the agricultural products and food industry in China. It is devoted to realizing a fully integrated value chain from farmland to dining table, establishing the urban complex with a fully integrated service chain, and utilizing renewable natural resources to provide healthy and nutritious food, high quality lifestyle and services, as well as contributing to improve peopleโs living standards, social prosperity and stability. Starting from grain and oils trading and processing, COFOC expands its value chain to planting and breeding, logistics and storage, raw materials processing, bio-fuel as well as production and distribution of branded products, real estate and financial services. COFCO boasts a wide range of branded products and service portfolios, including Fortune edible oil, Great Wall wine, Le Conte chocolate, Joy City shopping mall, Yalong Bay resorts, China Tea products , COFCO-Aviva Life Insurance, etc. As an investment holding company, COFCO has five companies listed in Hong Kong, namely, China Foods (HK00506), China Agri-Industries Holdings (HK00606), Mengniu Dairy (HK02319), COFCO Land Holdings (HK00207) and COFCO Packaging Holdings (HK00906) and three companies listed in mainland China, namely, COFCO Tunhe (600737), COFCO Real Estate (000031) and BBCA (000930). In accordance with the global economic integration, COFCO continuously strengthens its cooperation with global partners. COFCO acquires international agricultural products and commodity trading companies - Nidera and Noble Agri in 2014, accelerating its expansion of the international layout, and linking main production and consumption areas.
COFCO Corporation Company Details
cofco-corporation
10,001+ employees
0
311
Food and Beverage Manufacturing
cofco.com
Scan still pending
COF_1422313
In-progress
COFCO Corporation Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
COFCO Corporation Global Score.png)
COFCO Corporation Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
COFCO Corporation Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
COFCO Corporation Company Subsidiaries
Founded in 1949, COFCO is one of the 53 pillar enterprises under direct administration of the State Council. With years of endeavor, COFCO has developed from a solely trading company of grain and oils into the largest supplier of diversified products and services in the agricultural products and food industry in China. It is devoted to realizing a fully integrated value chain from farmland to dining table, establishing the urban complex with a fully integrated service chain, and utilizing renewable natural resources to provide healthy and nutritious food, high quality lifestyle and services, as well as contributing to improve peopleโs living standards, social prosperity and stability. Starting from grain and oils trading and processing, COFOC expands its value chain to planting and breeding, logistics and storage, raw materials processing, bio-fuel as well as production and distribution of branded products, real estate and financial services. COFCO boasts a wide range of branded products and service portfolios, including Fortune edible oil, Great Wall wine, Le Conte chocolate, Joy City shopping mall, Yalong Bay resorts, China Tea products , COFCO-Aviva Life Insurance, etc. As an investment holding company, COFCO has five companies listed in Hong Kong, namely, China Foods (HK00506), China Agri-Industries Holdings (HK00606), Mengniu Dairy (HK02319), COFCO Land Holdings (HK00207) and COFCO Packaging Holdings (HK00906) and three companies listed in mainland China, namely, COFCO Tunhe (600737), COFCO Real Estate (000031) and BBCA (000930). In accordance with the global economic integration, COFCO continuously strengthens its cooperation with global partners. COFCO acquires international agricultural products and commodity trading companies - Nidera and Noble Agri in 2014, accelerating its expansion of the international layout, and linking main production and consumption areas.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
COFCO Corporation Cyber Security News
SBTi platform affirms COFCO emissions targets
In 2023, the company achieved an 8% year-on-year reduction in Scope 1 and Scope 2 GHG emissions, while 89% of its energy needs were met withย ...
COFCO Company Profile, Stock Price, News, Rankings
COFCO ยท Ticker: ยท Company type:Private ยท Revenues ($M):$97,765 ยท Profits ($M):$1,270 ยท Market value ($M): ยท Number of employees:111,630.
US bars imports from 3 more Chinese companies over Uyghur forced labor
The United States restricted imports from three more Chinese companies, including COFCO Sugar Holding, over forced labor practices involvingย ...
Cofco arm pushes ahead with global agribusiness plans
The international business of China's state-owned food behemoth Cofco is pushing ahead with plans to build a global agribusiness to rivalย ...
IBM Wins SAP Deal with $34 Billion Chinese Agriculture Giant COFCO
IBM has won a major contract with China's $34b agriculture company COFCO to digitalise its procurement and trading platforms, using SAP.
Investigating Chinaโs economic coercion: The reach and role of Chinese corporate entities
How is corporate ownership used in Beijing's economic influence operations, and what makes a country more susceptible to coercive attempts?
The Evolution of Chinese Engagement in Argentina under Javier Milei
Through the PBOC, Argentina and China have an $18.5 billion currency swap arrangement. It was set up to facilitate the clearance of transactionsย ...
China's COFCO committed to Brazil soy-buying moratorium
Chinese state-owned grain trader COFCO is committed to Brazil's soy-buying moratorium, Allan Virtanen, the company's global director ofย ...
COFCO Corporation Similar Companies
PT SMART Tbk
PT SMART Tbk (SMART) adalah salah satu perusahaan publik produk konsumen berbasis kelapa sawit yang terintegrasi dan terkemuka di Indonesia yang berkomitmen pada produksi minyak sawit yang berkelanjutan. Perkebunan kelapa sawit SMART mencakup 137,000 hektar (termasuk plasma). Aktivitas utama kami
Agrosuper
We are a company born in the OโรรดHiggins Region that produces chicken, pork, turkey, and processed foods. Our production process is fully integrated and includes everything from animal feed manufacturing, breeding sectors, processing plants, distribution centers, and commercial offices, allowing us
Lauffer Group
Lauffer โ ะพะดะฝะฐ ะธะท ะบััะฟะฝะตะนัะธั ัะบัะฐะธะฝัะบะธั ะฑะธะทะฝะตั-ะณััะฟะฟ, ะปะธะดะตั ะฒ ะพััะฐัะปะธ ะฟะตัะตัะฐะฑะพัะบะธ ัะตะปััะบะพั ะพะทัะนััะฒะตะฝะฝะพะน ะฟัะพะดัะบัะธะธ ะธ ะฟัะพะธะทะฒะพะดััะฒะฐ ะฟัะพะดัะบัะพะฒ ะฟะธัะฐะฝะธั. ะะฑะปะฐะดะฐะตั ะดะธะฒะตััะธัะธัะธัะพะฒะฐะฝะฝัะผ ะฟะพัััะตะปะตะผ ะฐะบัะธะฒะพะฒ ะฟะพ ะฒัะตะน ัะตััะธัะพัะธะธ ะฃะบัะฐะธะฝั. ะััะฟะฟะฐ ะทะฐะฝะธะผะฐะตั ะปะธะดะธััััะธะต ะฟะพะทะธัะธะธ ะฟะพ ะฟัะพะธะทะฒะพะดััะฒั ั ะปะตะฑะพะฑัะปะพัะฝัั ะธะทะดะตะปะธะน ะฒ
Vivartia
ลรณ Vivartia, ลโ ลยบลยตลโฅลยฑลยชลรงลรลยตลร ลโ ลยตลรลยฑลฯลร ลรลยฑ ลรลร ลรธลรลรลยบลรขลโฆ ลรลรลโลโฆ ลยตลยชลยชลโลโฆลฯลโซลร ลยฑลโฅลรธลร ลยจ, ลยฅลฯลยฑลโลโ ลรลยตลฯ ลโซลรธลร ลรลรลยฑลรลยฑ ลรลร ลรธลรคลรฅลโฆลรลยฑ ลรลรธลร ลโซลยฑลยชลรงลรลรลรธลรลโฆ ลรลฯลร ลยฅลฯลยฑลรลร ลรธลรลฯลโซลโ ลร ลยฑลโฆลยจลโฅลโซลยตลร ลโซลยฑลฯ ลรลรลโฆลรลโลยตลฯลยตลร ลยตลโซลยฑลรลรธลยบลยบลรลร ลรลรขลโฆ ลโซลยฑลรลยฑลโฆลยฑลยชลรขลรลรฉ
Bimbo Bakeries USA
Have you ever started your morning with a Thomasโยฎ English muffin or bagel? Or bitten into the perfect slice of Sara Leeยฎ bread? Do you break open a fresh box of Entenmannโsยฎ donuts at family gatherings? If so, youโre already a fan of Bimbo Bakeries USA โ the powerhouse behind these iconic brands!
The Campbell's Company
Since 1869, weโve been connecting people through food they love. Our history was created by remarkable people, ideas and innovations. We are stewards of amazing brands. We have a focused strategy and leading brands in our two divisions: Meals & Beverages and Snacks. We foster a culture of belonging
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
COFCO Corporation CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, COFCO Corporation has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, COFCO Corporation has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Founded in 1949, COFCO is one of the 53 pillar enterprises under direct administration of the State Council. With years of endeavor, COFCO has developed from a solely trading company of grain and oils into the largest supplier of diversified products and services in the agricultural products and food industry in China. It is devoted to realizing a fully integrated value chain from farmland to dining table, establishing the urban complex with a fully integrated service chain, and utilizing renewable natural resources to provide healthy and nutritious food, high quality lifestyle and services, as well as contributing to improve peopleโs living standards, social prosperity and stability. Starting from grain and oils trading and processing, COFOC expands its value chain to planting and breeding, logistics and storage, raw materials processing, bio-fuel as well as production and distribution of branded products, real estate and financial services. COFCO boasts a wide range of branded products and service portfolios, including Fortune edible oil, Great Wall wine, Le Conte chocolate, Joy City shopping mall, Yalong Bay resorts, China Tea products , COFCO-Aviva Life Insurance, etc. As an investment holding company, COFCO has five companies listed in Hong Kong, namely, China Foods (HK00506), China Agri-Industries Holdings (HK00606), Mengniu Dairy (HK02319), COFCO Land Holdings (HK00207) and COFCO Packaging Holdings (HK00906) and three companies listed in mainland China, namely, COFCO Tunhe (600737), COFCO Real Estate (000031) and BBCA (000930). In accordance with the global economic integration, COFCO continuously strengthens its cooperation with global partners. COFCO acquires international agricultural products and commodity trading companies - Nidera and Noble Agri in 2014, accelerating its expansion of the international layout, and linking main production and consumption areas..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
