Comparison Overview

Club Med

VS

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

Club Med

Paris, FR
Last Update: 2026-04-04
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.clubmed.com

Since it was founded in 1950 and it created the all-inclusive vacation concept, Club Med has been the world leader on its market, and has developed a resolutely upscale, friendly and multicultural spirit. Club Med boasts 70 resorts located in the most beautiful sites in the world, a cruise ship and Luxury Villas & Chalets and, now more than ever, is associated with dreams and happiness. There are 20,000 Gentle Organizers (G.Os) and Gentle Employees (G.Es) at Club Med, who work in the villages, but also at the Paris, Lyon, Singapore, Shanghai, Rio de Janeiro and Miami headquarters, in the sales offices situated in dozens of countries and in travel agencies.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 13,203
Subsidiaries: 34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts

Dubai Media City, Dubai, 500569, AE
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 800 and 849
https://www.fairmont.com/

Located in the heart of each destination we call home, a stay at any Fairmont hotel is truly unforgettable. Known for grand and awe-inspiring properties and thoughtful and engaging colleagues who aim to make each and every stay a cherished and memorable experience, we have been the stage for some of the most significant moments in global history. As a part of ALL - the Accor Live Limitless Lifestyle Loyalty Program, with 90 exceptional addresses in 32 countries, we are as favored by world leaders and business travelers as we are by families and those with a penchant for luxurious travels. Fairmont Hotels stand at the intersection of elegance and culture, where significant occasions are honored and pivotal global events unfold. Wherever we are situated, our hotels become the cultural and social heart of the community; so immersed in local traditions and so deeply connected to our surroundings, Fairmont Hotels are seen as an essential part of their respective destinations.

NAICS: 7211
NAICS Definition: Traveler Accommodation
Employees: 22,565
Subsidiaries: 120
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/club-med.jpeg
Club Med
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairmont-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Club Med
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Club Med in 2026.

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Fairmont Hotels & Resorts in 2026.

Incident History — Club Med (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Club Med cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Fairmont Hotels & Resorts (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/club-med.jpeg
Club Med
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fairmont-hotels-and-resorts.jpeg
Fairmont Hotels & Resorts
Incidents

Date Detected: 06/2018
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Club Med company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Club Med company has not reported any.

In the current year, Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company and Club Med company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company nor Club Med company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has disclosed at least one data breach, while Club Med company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company nor Club Med company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Club Med company nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Club Med company.

Fairmont Hotels & Resorts company employs more people globally than Club Med company, reflecting its scale as a Hospitality.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Club Med nor Fairmont Hotels & Resorts holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References