City Facilities Management Holdings Ltd Company Cyber Security Posture

cityfm.com

Inspired to make a positive change to the facilities management industry, Willie and Susan Haughey established City Refrigeration Holdings (UK) Ltd in 1985. Their new enterprise was founded on collaboration and transparency. A ground-breaking approach took City FM from its humble beginnings to building long-term partnerships with leading retailers all over the world. Under this innovative model, each partner receives a unique strategy, shaped by the needs of their business and implemented by a bespoke, self-delivered model that provides an unparalleled commitment to safety, quality and value. One of the worldโ€šร„รดs largest privately owned FM companies City has accumulated a wealth of experience serving a variety of sectors -- healthcare, leisure and hospitality, retail, distribution and logistics, petrol forecourts, commercial property and construction. At the same time, weโ€šร„รดre also relentlessly focused on developing and shaping the future of FM, harnessing the power of innovation, technology and data to inform every step of our work. With consumer-focused people at the centre City employs over 9,000 highly qualified staff to deliver exceptional service, every time. All over the world, we help improve every aspect of customersโ€šร„รด lives--in supermarkets, offices and more. Equipped through frequent training opportunities, we are constantly building on their skills and continuing to exceed expectations. It is through their outstanding delivery that City drives efficiency and assurance even in the face of rapid change. Creating a better tomorrow As a responsible business, City FM is committed to being a net-zero carbon business by 2040. Our Net Zero target data has been independently validated by SBTi, and as active, engaged members of the Supply Chain Sustainability Council, the work has already begun to focus on achieving these targets. Show more Show less

CFMHL Company Details

Linkedin ID:

city-facilities-management-holdings-ltd

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

26021

NAICS:

561

Industry Type:

Facilities Services

Homepage:

cityfm.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

CIT_1021515

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreCFMHL Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

City Facilities Management Holdings Ltd Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

City Facilities Management Holdings Ltd Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

City Facilities Management Holdings Ltd Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Inspired to make a positive change to the facilities management industry, Willie and Susan Haughey established City Refrigeration Holdings (UK) Ltd in 1985. Their new enterprise was founded on collaboration and transparency. A ground-breaking approach took City FM from its humble beginnings to building long-term partnerships with leading retailers all over the world. Under this innovative model, each partner receives a unique strategy, shaped by the needs of their business and implemented by a bespoke, self-delivered model that provides an unparalleled commitment to safety, quality and value. One of the worldโ€šร„รดs largest privately owned FM companies City has accumulated a wealth of experience serving a variety of sectors -- healthcare, leisure and hospitality, retail, distribution and logistics, petrol forecourts, commercial property and construction. At the same time, weโ€šร„รดre also relentlessly focused on developing and shaping the future of FM, harnessing the power of innovation, technology and data to inform every step of our work. With consumer-focused people at the centre City employs over 9,000 highly qualified staff to deliver exceptional service, every time. All over the world, we help improve every aspect of customersโ€šร„รด lives--in supermarkets, offices and more. Equipped through frequent training opportunities, we are constantly building on their skills and continuing to exceed expectations. It is through their outstanding delivery that City drives efficiency and assurance even in the face of rapid change. Creating a better tomorrow As a responsible business, City FM is committed to being a net-zero carbon business by 2040. Our Net Zero target data has been independently validated by SBTi, and as active, engaged members of the Supply Chain Sustainability Council, the work has already begun to focus on achieving these targets. Show more Show less

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=city-facilities-management-holdings-ltd' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

CFMHL Cyber Security News

2025-06-03T12:45:00.000Z
EY US - Home | Building a better working world

We embrace our responsibility as independent auditors to perform high-quality audits that promote trust and confidence in the capital markets.

2025-03-06T08:00:00.000Z
Chinese Ports in Panama Come Under New Management

This deal signals that there might be benefits attached to countries engaging in discussions of US โ€œredlinesโ€ with Washington.

2020-11-19T17:10:14.000Z
Honeywell OT Cybersecurity 2025 Threat Report

At Honeywell, we're transforming the way the world works, solving your business's toughest challenges. Learn how we can drive your sustainabilityย ...

2020-01-27T08:00:00.000Z
Inside Fishtech Groupโ€™s World-Class Cybersecurity NOC

CEO Gary Fish founded Fishtech Group in 2016 as a successor to his previous company, FishNet Security, which was primarily a product retailer.

2023-04-11T13:25:20.000Z
Thales in Vietnam

Thales is a long-term trusted partner of the Vietnamese Navy having served the nation's defence markets since the early 1990s in coastal surveillance systems,ย ...

2021-10-14T16:46:27.000Z
Kyndryl United States

At Kyndryl, we design, build, manage and modernize the mission-critical technology systems that the world depends on every day.

2015-01-17T09:30:49.000Z
Leadership - Executive Management & Board Of Directors - Check Point Software

Nadav Zafrir joined Check Point as Chief Executive Officer and Board Member in December 2024. Previously, Mr. Zafrir was co-founder and managing partner atย ...

2019-06-18T21:08:33.000Z
UN OEWG in 2024

Currently, the focus is on the work of the UN Open-Ended Working Group (OEWG) on the security of and in the use of information and communications technologiesย ...

2022-01-28T08:00:00.000Z
The Battle for the Worldโ€™s Most Powerful Cyberweapon (Published 2022)

A Times investigation reveals how Israel reaped diplomatic gains around the world from NSO's Pegasus spyware โ€” a tool America itselfย ...

similarCompanies

CFMHL Similar Companies

Integrated Cleaning Management

ICM was the UK's leading specialist provider of cleaning and related services. Established in 1996, ICM's 10,000 employees work on more than 5,000 client sites, providing effective and efficient services for more than 32 million sq ft of floor space every day. ICM operates across the country via s

Aden Group

Aden Group is a Euro-Asian enterprise delivering comprehensive solutions to boost decarbonization, productivity and energy transition in the built environment. It achieves this through its portfolio of subsidiary businesses which includes technical assets & facilities management, industrial real est

Mitie

Founded in 1987, Mitie is the UKโ€™s leading facilities management and professional services company. We offer a range of specialist services including Security, Engineering Services, Cleaning, Landscaping, Energy and Property Consultancy, Property Maintenance, and Custody Support Services. Mitie emp

From initial site setup to ongoing operations, we provide high-quality, tailored services underpinned by local expertise, advanced technology and an unwavering commitment to safety, quality and community empowerment. Our Services โ€ข Remote site development: From concept to completion, we design, cons

Globe Williams International

Established in Australia in 1999, Globe Williams International stands at the forefront of Total Integrated Facility Management Services, serving diverse industries globally. Our reach now spans 35 offices across Europe, the Asia Pacific, North America, and Africa, showcasing our commitment to innova

Dusters Total Solutions Services Private Limited

Today, with presence in 50 cities and towns, servicing 800+ customers in over 1200 customer locations, Dusters Total Solutions Services Pvt Ltd is one of Indiaโ€šร„รดs leading Integrated Facility Management Service Providers in terms of scale, reach, customer profile, area under maintenance, employee st

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

CFMHL CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, CFMHL has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, CFMHL has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Inspired to make a positive change to the facilities management industry, Willie and Susan Haughey established City Refrigeration Holdings (UK) Ltd in 1985. Their new enterprise was founded on collaboration and transparency. A ground-breaking approach took City FM from its humble beginnings to building long-term partnerships with leading retailers all over the world. Under this innovative model, each partner receives a unique strategy, shaped by the needs of their business and implemented by a bespoke, self-delivered model that provides an unparalleled commitment to safety, quality and value. One of the worldโ€šร„รดs largest privately owned FM companies City has accumulated a wealth of experience serving a variety of sectors -- healthcare, leisure and hospitality, retail, distribution and logistics, petrol forecourts, commercial property and construction. At the same time, weโ€šร„รดre also relentlessly focused on developing and shaping the future of FM, harnessing the power of innovation, technology and data to inform every step of our work. With consumer-focused people at the centre City employs over 9,000 highly qualified staff to deliver exceptional service, every time. All over the world, we help improve every aspect of customersโ€šร„รด lives--in supermarkets, offices and more. Equipped through frequent training opportunities, we are constantly building on their skills and continuing to exceed expectations. It is through their outstanding delivery that City drives efficiency and assurance even in the face of rapid change. Creating a better tomorrow As a responsible business, City FM is committed to being a net-zero carbon business by 2040. Our Net Zero target data has been independently validated by SBTi, and as active, engaged members of the Supply Chain Sustainability Council, the work has already begun to focus on achieving these targets. Show more Show less.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge