Chinasoft International Company Cyber Security Posture
chinasoftinc.comChinasoft International Limited (CSI. 00354.HK), founded in 2000, is an industry leader in globalized software and information technology services, with branches in 28 cities across China including Beijing, Xi’an, Nanjing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Hong Kong and 18 cities in countries like America, Mexico, Japan, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Romania and so on. The total number of employees exceeds 60 thousand. With profound ADM (Application Development and Management) experience as well as abundant cases and experts of the best level in the field of enterprise digital transformation, CSI works with the strategic partners such as Huawei to construct the internet information technology service platform, take the lead in technological innovation and improve industrial efficiency, so as to enable the software companies to navigate in industrial development, serve the manufacturers in transformation and upgrades and provide IT services featuring “abundant, fast, good and economical” to state-owned enterprise. Adhering to the values of “Be truthful. Persevere always. Strive forward. Benefit clients. Create sharing. Grow globally”, CSI is the one of the most trust-worthy expert and partner for you. For almost 2 decades, CSI has served the Fortune 500 enterprises as well as the large and medium-sized clients, delivering extraordinary performance in industries such as E-governance, manufacturing, education, finance, telecommunication, energy and logistics, consolidating advantages in Cloud, big data and industrial internet. Since 2017 CSI has become one of the largest software and IT Service company in China with both its market value and annual income in excess of RMB 10 billion.
Chinasoft International Company Details
chinasoft-international
10,001+ employees
23331
none
Information Technology & Services
chinasoftinc.com
13
CHI_1363332
In-progress
Chinasoft International Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 700 and 800
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Chinasoft International Global Score.png)
Chinasoft International Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 700 and 800 |
Chinasoft International Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Chinasoft International Company Subsidiaries
Chinasoft International Limited (CSI. 00354.HK), founded in 2000, is an industry leader in globalized software and information technology services, with branches in 28 cities across China including Beijing, Xi’an, Nanjing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Hong Kong and 18 cities in countries like America, Mexico, Japan, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Romania and so on. The total number of employees exceeds 60 thousand. With profound ADM (Application Development and Management) experience as well as abundant cases and experts of the best level in the field of enterprise digital transformation, CSI works with the strategic partners such as Huawei to construct the internet information technology service platform, take the lead in technological innovation and improve industrial efficiency, so as to enable the software companies to navigate in industrial development, serve the manufacturers in transformation and upgrades and provide IT services featuring “abundant, fast, good and economical” to state-owned enterprise. Adhering to the values of “Be truthful. Persevere always. Strive forward. Benefit clients. Create sharing. Grow globally”, CSI is the one of the most trust-worthy expert and partner for you. For almost 2 decades, CSI has served the Fortune 500 enterprises as well as the large and medium-sized clients, delivering extraordinary performance in industries such as E-governance, manufacturing, education, finance, telecommunication, energy and logistics, consolidating advantages in Cloud, big data and industrial internet. Since 2017 CSI has become one of the largest software and IT Service company in China with both its market value and annual income in excess of RMB 10 billion.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Chinasoft International Cyber Security News
China-Africa Cooperation: Beijing’s vision raises free expression concerns
The 9th Forum on China-Africa Cooperation has prompted fears for freedom of expression and information integrity across Africa.
Russia’s Becoming More Digitally Isolated—and Dependent on China
Russia has become more digitally isolated—and increasingly dependent on China—with significant ramifications for human rights in Russia, ...
Community watch: China’s vision for the future of the internet
China's vision for the internet is a vision for global norms around political speech, political oppression, and surveillance.
How Good Are China’s Cyber Defenses?
At the operational level, the cybersecurity of most Chinese government agencies and corporations remains weak to very weak. The biggest surprise ...
New U.S. National Security Strategy: Key China Content
We will seek greater strategic stability through measures that reduce the risk of unintended military escalation, enhance crisis communications, ...
Kamala Harris’s Foreign Policy Positions
Harris advocates for comprehensive immigration reform. She was tasked with leading the federal effort to address the root causes of migration from Central ...
Donald Trump's Foreign Policy Positions
As president, Trump unveiled the first national strategies on emerging fields such as cybersecurity and artificial intelligence (AI).
Is China’s Huawei a Threat to U.S. National Security?
Huawei is a Chinese telecommunications giant that has stoked fears of espionage and intellectual property theft in the United States and many other countries.
An Update on U.S.-China Cybersecurity Relations
Senior Fellow Adam Segal shares in thoughts on the latest round of the Track 1.5 U.S.-China Cyber Security Dialogue.
Chinasoft International Similar Companies
Fujitsu Portugal
A Fujitsu é a companhia líder japonesa de tecnologias de informação e comunicação (TIC) disponibilizando um leque completo de produtos tecnológicos, soluções e serviços. Cerca de 132.000 colaboradores da Fujitsu prestam suporte a clientes em mais de 100 países. Utilizamos a nossa experiência e o pod
IT Six Global Services
IT Six Global Services is a global technology and outsourcing company committed to deliver innovation through software services. With partners in the US, Germany, Switzerland, Norway, England and the Netherlands, IT Six has become one of the largest software houses in the region, known for the quali
The Macgregor Group
A Leading Trade Order Management System Company. The flag ship product was Predator, an robust equity trading system. Macgregor took over Merrin Financial. Macgregor later was acquired by ITG (Investment Technology Group). Macgregor product and services consists of Merrin XIP - Portfolio and T
VINCI Energies
In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutions, from design to implement
Thoughtworks
Thoughtworks is a pioneering global technology consultancy, leading the charge in custom software development and technology innovation. We empower ambitious businesses to thrive in a constantly evolving world. We integrate the best of strategy, design, and software engineering to provide our client
Computacenter
Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technol
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Chinasoft International CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Chinasoft International has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Chinasoft International has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Chinasoft International Limited (CSI. 00354.HK), founded in 2000, is an industry leader in globalized software and information technology services, with branches in 28 cities across China including Beijing, Xi’an, Nanjing, Shenzhen, Shanghai, Hong Kong and 18 cities in countries like America, Mexico, Japan, India, Malaysia, Singapore, Romania and so on. The total number of employees exceeds 60 thousand. With profound ADM (Application Development and Management) experience as well as abundant cases and experts of the best level in the field of enterprise digital transformation, CSI works with the strategic partners such as Huawei to construct the internet information technology service platform, take the lead in technological innovation and improve industrial efficiency, so as to enable the software companies to navigate in industrial development, serve the manufacturers in transformation and upgrades and provide IT services featuring “abundant, fast, good and economical” to state-owned enterprise. Adhering to the values of “Be truthful. Persevere always. Strive forward. Benefit clients. Create sharing. Grow globally”, CSI is the one of the most trust-worthy expert and partner for you. For almost 2 decades, CSI has served the Fortune 500 enterprises as well as the large and medium-sized clients, delivering extraordinary performance in industries such as E-governance, manufacturing, education, finance, telecommunication, energy and logistics, consolidating advantages in Cloud, big data and industrial internet. Since 2017 CSI has become one of the largest software and IT Service company in China with both its market value and annual income in excess of RMB 10 billion..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
