Comparison Overview

China Communications Services

VS

IBM

China Communications Services

Beijing, 100010, CN
Last Update: 2026-03-28

The Company is a New Generation Integrated Smart Service Provider, with the mission of "Building Smart Society, Promoting Digital Economy, Serving a Good Life", providing integrated comprehensive solutions in the informatization and digitalization sector. We offer telecommunications infrastructure services (including design, construction and project supervision and management), business process outsourcing services (including management of infrastructure for information technology, general facilities management, supply chain and products distribution), and applications, content and other services (including system integration, software development and system support, and value-added services). The Company is also the largest telecommunications infrastructure service group in China with over 100 specialized companies that offer a range of professional services along our customers' value chain. All the major telecommunications operators in the PRC, namely, China Telecommunications Corporation, China Mobile Communications Group Co., Ltd. and China United Network Communications Group Company Limited, as well as China Tower Corporation Limited are our customers. We also provide services to domestic non-telecom operator customers like government agencies, industrial customers and small and medium enterprises as well as overseas customers. Our service coverage is spread across the nation and we have also extended our business to dozens of countries and regions globally. On 8 December 2006, the H shares issued by the Company were successfully listed on the Main Board of the Stock Exchange of Hong Kong Limited. As of 30 June 2019, the total number of issued shares of the Company was 6,926,018,400 shares, including 2,391,420,240 H shares and 4,534,598,160 domestic shares.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 943
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

IBM

International Business Machines Corp., Armonk, New York, 10504, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 600 and 649

At IBM, we do more than work. We create. We create as technologists, developers, and engineers. We create with our partners. We create with our competitors. If you're searching for ways to make the world work better through technology and infrastructure, software and consulting, then we want to work with you. We're here to help every creator turn their "what if" into what is. Let's create something that will change everything.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 341,860
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-communications-services.jpeg
China Communications Services
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
China Communications Services
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
IBM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for China Communications Services in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

IBM has 39.02% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — China Communications Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China Communications Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — IBM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

IBM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/china-communications-services.jpeg
China Communications Services
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/ibm.jpeg
IBM
Incidents

Date Detected: 1/2026
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: phishing, weak_passwords, improper_data_handling
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 12/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Network
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: AI supply chain and model attacks
Blog: Blog

FAQ

China Communications Services company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to IBM company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

IBM company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas China Communications Services company has not reported any.

In the current year, IBM company has reported more cyber incidents than China Communications Services company.

Neither IBM company nor China Communications Services company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one data breach, while China Communications Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while China Communications Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

IBM company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while China Communications Services company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

IBM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to China Communications Services company.

IBM company employs more people globally than China Communications Services company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither China Communications Services nor IBM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H