Comparison Overview

CGI

VS

Infosys BPM

CGI

Worldwide, Worldwide, CA, 00
Last Update: 2026-03-21
Between 700 and 749

Insights you can act on. Founded in 1976, CGI is among the largest IT and business consulting services firms in the world. We are insights-driven and outcomes-focused to help accelerate returns on your investments. Across hundreds of locations worldwide, we provide comprehensive, scalable and sustainable IT and business consulting services that are informed globally and delivered locally. We value your opinions and welcome your comments and questions on our posts here on LinkedIn. Please keep a polite, professional and constructive tone. We remove comments containing objectionable language and derogatory views. We do not allow content that is unrelated to the subject, and we remove discriminatory and racist comments as well as spam and advertising. Note that content on this page contains general information regarding CGI’s services and initiatives and should not be considered direct business advice. To engage in a discussion with one of our experts, please make a request through https://www.cgi.com/en/contact-us

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 70,253
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Infosys BPM

Infosys BPM Limited, Plot no 26/3, 26/4, 26/6, Hosur Road, Electronics City, Bengaluru, 560100, IN
Last Update: 2026-03-25
Between 800 and 849

Infosys BPM Ltd., the business process management subsidiary of Infosys Ltd. (NYSE: INFY), was set up in April 2002. Infosys BPM focuses on integrated end-to-end outsourcing and delivers transformational benefits to its clients through reduced costs, ongoing productivity improvements, and process re-engineering. Infosys BPM operates in India, Poland, the Czech Republic, the Netherlands, Ireland, South Africa, Brazil, Mexico, Costa Rica, the United States, Puerto Rico, China, the Philippines, Singapore, and Australia. Infosys BPM has been consistently ranked among the leading BPM companies and has received over 60 awards and recognitions in the last 5 years from key industry bodies and forums like the International Association of Outsourcing Professionals, Outsourcing Center, SSON, and NOA, among others. Infosys BPM also has very robust people practices, as substantiated by the various HR-specific awards it has won over the years. The company has consistently been ranked among the top employers of choice, on the basis of its industry-leading HR best practices. The company’s senior leaders contribute widely to industry forums as BPO strategists.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 43,598
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgi.jpeg
CGI
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CGI
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Infosys BPM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

CGI has 40.12% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Infosys BPM in 2026.

Incident History — CGI (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CGI cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Infosys BPM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Infosys BPM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cgi.jpeg
CGI
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2026
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/infosys-bpm.jpeg
Infosys BPM
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 11/2023
Type:Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2023
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Infosys BPM company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CGI company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Infosys BPM company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to CGI company.

In the current year, CGI company has reported more cyber incidents than Infosys BPM company.

Infosys BPM company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CGI company has not reported such incidents publicly.

CGI company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Infosys BPM company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Infosys BPM company nor CGI company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CGI company nor Infosys BPM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Infosys BPM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CGI company.

CGI company employs more people globally than Infosys BPM company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CGI nor Infosys BPM holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A flaw has been found in wandb OpenUI up to 1.0. This affects the function create_share/get_share of the file backend/openui/server.py of the component HTMLAnnotator Component. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to HTML injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in QDOCS Smart School Management System up to 7.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/enquiry of the component Admission Enquiry Module. Performing a manipulation of the argument Note results in cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.2. This is due to the '{usermeta:password_reset_link}' template tag being processed within post content via the '[um_loggedin]' shortcode, which generates a valid password reset token for the currently logged-in user viewing the page. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to craft a malicious pending post that, when previewed by an Administrator, generates a password reset token for the Administrator and exfiltrates it to an attacker-controlled server, leading to full account takeover.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

LibJWT is a C JSON Web Token Library. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.3.0, the JWK parsing for RSA-PSS did not protect against a NULL value when expecting to parse JSON string values. A specially crafted JWK file could exploit this behavior by using integers in places where the code expected a string. This was fixed in v3.3.0. A workaround is available. Users importing keys through a JWK file should not do so from untrusted sources. Use the `jwk2key` tool to check for validity of a JWK file. Likewise, if possible, do not use JWK files with RSA-PSS keys.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Starting in version 2.0.39 and prior to version 3.0.25, a prototype pollution vulnerability exists in the `parse_str` function of the npm package locutus. An attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` by overriding `RegExp.prototype.test` and then passing a crafted query string to `parse_str`, bypassing the prototype pollution guard. This vulnerability stems from an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-25521. The CVE-2026-25521 patch replaced the `String.prototype.includes()`-based guard with a `RegExp.prototype.test()`-based guard. However, `RegExp.prototype.test` is itself a writable prototype method that can be overridden, making the new guard bypassable in the same way as the original — trading one hijackable built-in for another. Version 3.0.25 contains an updated fix.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X