Comparison Overview

Centrica

VS

EDP

Centrica

Maidenhead Road, Windsor, SL4 5GD, GB
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.centrica.com

Centrica is an international energy services and solutions company, founded on a 200-year heritage of serving customers in homes and businesses. We supply energy and services to over 10 million customers, mainly in the UK and Ireland, through brands such as British Gas, Bord Gáis Energy and Centrica Business Solutions. Through our trusted brands, we deliver innovative energy and services solutions to help solve customers’ needs, supported by thousands of engineers and technicians. We are committed to energising a greener, fairer future.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 18,421
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

EDP

Av. 24 de Julho, nº12, Lisboa, PT, 1249 - 300
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.edp.com

Our story began more than 40 years ago. Today we are a global company, among the largest players in the energy sector in Europe and the 4th largest producer of wind energy. We are proud to be a leading utility integrated in the Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes (World). We want to build a new energy by promoting renewable sources. To do this, we have chosen ... ... to be 100% green by 2030; ... to be Net Zero by 2040; ... to innovate, to shape the energy sector; ... empower our communities to live more sustainably. Ours is the energy that strives to create a better future, inspired by people from four regional hubs. It is the energy that knows no borders, that never sleeps, and that connects us to you. We will harness wind, sun and water to lead the energy transition. We will all be green. We choose the Earth. Welcome to the official EDP Group LinkedIn page.

NAICS: 22
NAICS Definition: Utilities
Employees: 13,888
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edp.jpeg
EDP
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centrica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
EDP
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centrica in 2026.

Incidents vs Utilities Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for EDP in 2026.

Incident History — Centrica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centrica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — EDP (X = Date, Y = Severity)

EDP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centrica.jpeg
Centrica
Incidents

Date Detected: 11/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2015
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Credential Stuffing
Motivation: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/edp.jpeg
EDP
Incidents

Date Detected: 04/2020
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware (DynoWiper)
Motivation: Destabilization, Cyber Warfare
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Centrica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to EDP company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Centrica and EDP have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, EDP company and Centrica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Both EDP company and Centrica company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Neither EDP company nor Centrica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

EDP company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Centrica company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Centrica company nor EDP company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Both EDP company and Centrica company have a similar number of subsidiaries worldwide.

Centrica company employs more people globally than EDP company, reflecting its scale as a Utilities.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centrica nor EDP holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Published
Date
2026-03-31
Updated
Date
2026-03-31
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References