Central Coalfields Limited Company Cyber Security Posture
centralcoalfieds.inCentral Coal Fields Limited was established on 01/11/1975. It is a Miniratna company and is a subsidiary of Coal India Limited. CCL is headquartered at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, Jharkhand. It has Sixty-Five operative mines and Six washeries encompassing six districts of Jharkhand state. Central Coal fields Limited produced a massive 68.7 MT coal in the previous year which was 9.4% of the total coal production of the country. Central Coal fields Limited is a significant contributor to the state exchequer and has been one of the highest taxpayer in the state of Jharkhand over the years. Central Coal Fields limited endeavors to achieve an inclusive development of all the shareholders through its welfare and Corporate Social Responsibility schemes. CCL executes various schemes in Education, Skill Development, Health Care, Drinking water, etc. The aim of the company is to improve the future of the children through coal Production. The Company operates a sports University in Ranchi and provides free coaching assistance to students for Engineering Entrance Examinations. Central Coal Fields limited is a recipient of numerous awards at National and International forums. Central Coal Fields Limited Stands out in the crowd of the competitors because of • Humane touch to Mining • Embrace of Corporate Social Responsibility • Willingness to adapt to change.
CCL Company Details
central-coalfields-limited
10,001+ employees
7109
212
Mining
centralcoalfieds.in
Scan still pending
CEN_1256896
In-progress
CCL Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
CCL Global Score.png)
Central Coalfields Limited Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Central Coalfields Limited Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Central Coalfields Limited Company Subsidiaries
Central Coal Fields Limited was established on 01/11/1975. It is a Miniratna company and is a subsidiary of Coal India Limited. CCL is headquartered at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, Jharkhand. It has Sixty-Five operative mines and Six washeries encompassing six districts of Jharkhand state. Central Coal fields Limited produced a massive 68.7 MT coal in the previous year which was 9.4% of the total coal production of the country. Central Coal fields Limited is a significant contributor to the state exchequer and has been one of the highest taxpayer in the state of Jharkhand over the years. Central Coal Fields limited endeavors to achieve an inclusive development of all the shareholders through its welfare and Corporate Social Responsibility schemes. CCL executes various schemes in Education, Skill Development, Health Care, Drinking water, etc. The aim of the company is to improve the future of the children through coal Production. The Company operates a sports University in Ranchi and provides free coaching assistance to students for Engineering Entrance Examinations. Central Coal Fields limited is a recipient of numerous awards at National and International forums. Central Coal Fields Limited Stands out in the crowd of the competitors because of • Humane touch to Mining • Embrace of Corporate Social Responsibility • Willingness to adapt to change.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
CCL Cyber Security News
Strategic shift in cyberattacks on India’s power sector? Here is what experts say
Cyber experts warn that there is a strategic shift in cyberattacks on India's power sector. They note that the cyberattack on Central ...
Attack at the core: CCL breach sounds alarm over national cybersecurity gaps
The CCL hack is not just a breach of a website—it is a breach of trust in our systems, in our preparedness, and in our assumptions about digital ...
Panel Discussion: Cybersecurity in Public Sector Enterprises: Protecting Critical National Infrastructure in a Digital World
+ Emphasizes cybersecurity through strong organizational culture, continuous phishing simulations, AI integration, red-blue teaming, proactive ...
Operation Sindoor: As India hit Pakistan, 6 nations fired cyber missiles
During Operation Sindoor, India faced significant cyberattacks orchestrated by state-backed hackers and hacktivists from various countries, ...
Airspace to cyberspace: How India fought swarms of drones, wave of misinformation during conflict
Pakistani unmanned aerial vehicles targeted key Indian Air Force bases, while state-backed hackers and disinformation campaigns struck websites, ...
Six countries allegedly teamed up with Pakistan in cyber attacks on India
The attacks reportedly aimed to embarrass India on the global stage and steal sensitive data, particularly related to its missile programs.
China-Backed Hackers Strike as India Defends Against Pak Missiles
According to The Times of India, multiple cyberattacks were directed at defence PSUs, their MSME vendors, and vital infrastructure such as ports ...
WCL to organize two-day seminar on 'Coal Mine Safety in India' on 25-26th March 2025
Western Coalfields Limited (WCL) is organizing a two-day seminar on “Coal Mine Safety in India” on 25-26th March 2025 at Hotel Centre Point, Ramdaspeth, Nagpur.
Chandra Shekhar Tiwari Takes Over as Director (Technical), CCL
Chandra Shekhar Tiwari has officially taken charge as Director (Technical) of Central Coalfields Limited (CCL), a key subsidiary of Coal India Limited (CIL).
CCL Similar Companies
ArcelorMittal Brasil
ArcelorMittal no Brasil: A ArcelorMittal, líder global na indústria de aço e mineração, desenvolve aços de alta qualidade e eficiência que nos ajudam a tornar o mundo mais sustentável. Nas Américas Central, do Sul e Caribe, produzimos soluções inovadoras em Aços Longos e Aços Planos que satisfazem
Yamana Gold Inc.
Canadian-based gold producer with operations and projects in the Americas Producteur d’or basé au Canada avec des sites miniers et des projets dans les Amériques ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Sinosteel Corporation Limited
Sinosteel Corporation abbreviated as Sinosteel is a central enterprise under the administration of the State-Owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission. There are 86 subsidiaries under the administration of Sinosteel, among which 63 are in China and 23 abroad. In 2009, the core businesse
NLMK Group
NLMK Group is a leading international steel company. The Group is vertically integrated company producing and delivering a comprehensive range of flat and long steel products. NLMK, with over 17 million tonnes of steelmaking capacity, is one of the world's foremost suppliers of slabs and transformer
China Steel Corporation
China Steel Corporation (CSC), located at Kaohsiung, Taiwan, was founded in December 1971. With annual production (in terms of crude steel) around 10 million tonnes, CSC produces a range of products including plates, bars, wire rods, hot and cold rolled coils, electrogalvanized coils, electrical ste
JSW Steel
Over the last 35 years, we have partnered the country in its journey to self-reliance, by embracing sustainability, adopting cutting-edge technology and having innovation and R&D initiatives at the heart of our culture. From humble beginnings with a single plant in 1982, we are now India's leading m
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
CCL CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, CCL has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, CCL has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Central Coal Fields Limited was established on 01/11/1975. It is a Miniratna company and is a subsidiary of Coal India Limited. CCL is headquartered at Darbhanga House, Ranchi, Jharkhand. It has Sixty-Five operative mines and Six washeries encompassing six districts of Jharkhand state. Central Coal fields Limited produced a massive 68.7 MT coal in the previous year which was 9.4% of the total coal production of the country. Central Coal fields Limited is a significant contributor to the state exchequer and has been one of the highest taxpayer in the state of Jharkhand over the years. Central Coal Fields limited endeavors to achieve an inclusive development of all the shareholders through its welfare and Corporate Social Responsibility schemes. CCL executes various schemes in Education, Skill Development, Health Care, Drinking water, etc. The aim of the company is to improve the future of the children through coal Production. The Company operates a sports University in Ranchi and provides free coaching assistance to students for Engineering Entrance Examinations. Central Coal Fields limited is a recipient of numerous awards at National and International forums. Central Coal Fields Limited Stands out in the crowd of the competitors because of • Humane touch to Mining • Embrace of Corporate Social Responsibility • Willingness to adapt to change..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
