Comparison Overview

CB&I

VS

aramco

CB&I

1725 Hughes Landing Blvd, The Woodlands, 77380, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cbi.com/

CB&I is the world’s leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout its 135+ year history, CB&I has the global expertise and strategically located operations to provide its customers world-class storage solutions for even the most complex energy infrastructure projects. CB&I is owned by a consortium of financial investors led by Mason Capital Management LLC. To learn more, visit www.cbi.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 11,368
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, SA, 31311
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 800 and 849
https://www.aramco.com

We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 167,145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cb&i.jpeg
CB&I
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CB&I
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
aramco
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CB&I in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2026.

Incident History — CB&I (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CB&I cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cb&i.jpeg
CB&I
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Cyber warfare, industrial espionage
Blog: Blog

FAQ

aramco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CB&I company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

aramco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CB&I company has not reported any.

In the current year, aramco company and CB&I company have not reported any cyber incidents.

aramco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while CB&I company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither aramco company nor CB&I company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

aramco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while CB&I company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CB&I company nor aramco company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CB&I company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to aramco company.

aramco company employs more people globally than CB&I company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CB&I nor aramco holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References