Comparison Overview

CB&I

VS

Valero

CB&I

1725 Hughes Landing Blvd, The Woodlands, 77380, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799

CB&I is the world’s leading designer and builder of storage facilities, tanks, and terminals. With more than 60,000 structures completed throughout its 135+ year history, CB&I has the global expertise and strategically located operations to provide its customers world-class storage solutions for even the most complex energy infrastructure projects. CB&I is owned by a consortium of financial investors led by Mason Capital Management LLC. To learn more, visit www.cbi.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 11,368
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Valero

One Valero Way, San Antonio, TX, US, 78249
Last Update: 2026-03-30
Between 750 and 799

Valero is an international manufacturer and marketer of transportation fuels and petrochemical products. We are a Fortune 500 company based in San Antonio, Texas, fueled by nearly 10,000 employees and 15 petroleum refineries with a combined throughput capacity of approximately 3.2 million barrels per day. We also proudly operate 12 ethanol plants in the Mid-Continent of the U.S., with a combined production capacity of 1.6 billion gallons per year. Our petroleum refineries are located in the United States, Canada and the United Kingdom. Valero also is a joint venture partner in Diamond Green Diesel, which operates a renewable diesel plant in Norco, Louisiana. Diamond Green Diesel is North America’s largest biomass-based diesel plant. Valero sells its products in the wholesale rack or bulk markets in the U.S., Canada, the U.K., Ireland and Latin America. Approximately 7,000 outlets carry Valero’s brand names. Visit www.valero.com for more information, and click 'Careers' to explore opportunities!

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 10,983
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cb&i.jpeg
CB&I
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valero-energy.jpeg
Valero
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CB&I
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Valero
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CB&I in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Valero in 2026.

Incident History — CB&I (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CB&I cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Valero (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Valero cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cb&i.jpeg
CB&I
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/valero-energy.jpeg
Valero
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CB&I company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Valero company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Valero company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CB&I company.

In the current year, Valero company and CB&I company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Valero company nor CB&I company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Valero company nor CB&I company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Valero company nor CB&I company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CB&I company nor Valero company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

CB&I company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Valero company.

CB&I company employs more people globally than Valero company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CB&I nor Valero holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H