CAF (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles) Company Cyber Security Posture

cafmobility.com

CAF is a global leader in comprehensive transportation systems, shaping the future of sustainable mobility. More and more cities worldwide choose us as their strategic partner to tackle the challenges of mobility and decarbonisation of transport. Continuous innovation is the cornerstone of our company, enabling us to develop advanced solutions that meet the evolving needs of our customers. This has positioned CAF at the forefront of sustainable mobility as a benchmark company in global accessible rail markets and as the European leader in the zero-emission urban bus segment. These achievements would not be possible without the dedication of our workforce: a 16,000-strong team across more than 60 countries who demonstrate a firm commitment to excellence and quality. They are the driving force behind our success and ability to innovate and lead in sustainable mobility. Together, we are building a greener and more efficient future, transforming the way we move the world, and making a positive contribution to the well-being of the planet and its people. We know itโ€™s time to step forward. Note: This is the official LinkedIn account of CAF Group that integrates the different legal entities that operate under CAF brand.

C(ADF Company Details

Linkedin ID:

caf-mobility

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

206884

NAICS:

336

Industry Type:

Motor Vehicle Manufacturing

Homepage:

cafmobility.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

CAF_7413379

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreC(ADF Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

Ailogo

CAF (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles) Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

CAF (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles) Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
0
Attack Types
0
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView

CAF (Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles) Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

CAF is a global leader in comprehensive transportation systems, shaping the future of sustainable mobility. More and more cities worldwide choose us as their strategic partner to tackle the challenges of mobility and decarbonisation of transport. Continuous innovation is the cornerstone of our company, enabling us to develop advanced solutions that meet the evolving needs of our customers. This has positioned CAF at the forefront of sustainable mobility as a benchmark company in global accessible rail markets and as the European leader in the zero-emission urban bus segment. These achievements would not be possible without the dedication of our workforce: a 16,000-strong team across more than 60 countries who demonstrate a firm commitment to excellence and quality. They are the driving force behind our success and ability to innovate and lead in sustainable mobility. Together, we are building a greener and more efficient future, transforming the way we move the world, and making a positive contribution to the well-being of the planet and its people. We know itโ€™s time to step forward. Note: This is the official LinkedIn account of CAF Group that integrates the different legal entities that operate under CAF brand.

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=caf-mobility' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

C(ADF Cyber Security News

2024-10-15T07:00:00.000Z
Cervello partners with Finnish Transport Infrastructure Agency to strengthen railway cybersecurity

Cervello redefines rail cybersecurity with cutting-edge solutions designed to protect and empower rail networks globally. Cervello Platformย ...

2023-12-04T08:00:00.000Z
CAF chooses Cervello to secure Israel Landmark Light Rail in Tel Aviv

CAF and Cervello's alliance will transform the rail cybersecurity landscape, merging global, world-leading solutions to fortify the Purpleย ...

2023-11-30T08:00:00.000Z
CAF selects Israeli rail cyber startup Cervello to secure Tel Avivโ€™s Light Rail

Cervello will provide security teams with visibility, deep asset intelligence, and risk management capabilities to detect cyber threats.

2023-11-29T08:00:00.000Z
Cyber Startup Chosen To Secure Upcoming Tel Aviv Light Rail Line

An Israeli startup's AI-driven cybersecurity solution has been chosen to secure a Tel Aviv light rail line, which will span 27 kilometers.

2022-09-13T07:00:00.000Z
CAF wins over โ‚ฌ220m worth of contracts in Germany and Australia

Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) has received two contracts totalling more than โ‚ฌ220m in Germany and Australia.

2022-05-02T07:00:00.000Z
CAF wins contract for new trains in Spain

CAF wins contract for new trains in Spain. CAF will deliver eight new units for Granada Metro. ... The new trains can carry 221 passengers. Creditย ...

2022-04-11T07:00:00.000Z
CAF wins battery-electric trains contract in Germany

CAF has secured a contract from Rhein-Ruhr and Westfalen-Lippe transport authorities in Germany to deliver battery-electric trains.

2022-03-15T07:00:00.000Z
Saudi Arabia Railway awards $260m contract to CAF

Construcciones y Auxiliar de Ferrocarriles (CAF) has secured a $260m (โ‚ฌ200m) service contract from railway operator Saudi Arabia Railway.

2024-03-13T07:00:00.000Z
GMV enters the Greek intelligent transportation systems market with CAF

The project includes supplying the passenger information system, the public address system, the intercom system, and the video-surveillance system.

similarCompanies

C(ADF Similar Companies

Delphi Auto Parts

Delphi Product & Service Solutions is Delphiโ€™s aftermarket channel. In the aftermarket, our technologies cover every aspect of todayโ€™s vehicles, from brakes to steering, air conditioning to ignition, engine management to fuel systems โ€” whether the vehicle is a hybrid, or powered by gasoline or diese

Porsche AG

โ€œIn the beginning I looked around and could not find quite the car I dreamed of. So I decided to build it myself.โ€œ This quote from Ferry Porsche gets to the heart of everything that makes Porsche what it is. It has been our guiding star โ€“ for more than 70 years. With commitment, passion and enthusi

Joyson Group

Joyson Group is a young, ambitious high-tech company, its headquarter is located in Ningbo, China. With more than 100 bases in 30 countries, over 40000 employees globally. Founded in 2004, Joyson 's main products used to be automotive functional components. Since 2011, the company has acquired se

Michelin

Michelin is a world-leading manufacturer of life-changing composites and experiences. Pioneering materials science over more than 130 years, Michelin is uniquely positioned to make decisive contributions to human progress and a more sustainable world. Drawing on technological leadership in polymer

Saud Bahwan Group LLC

Building Brands. Building Enduring Success. As one of the nationโ€™s largest corporate houses, Saud Bahwan Group is at the forefront of touching peopleโ€™s lives through a range of market leaders across diverse businesses. They include brands like Toyota, Lexus, Hino, Yokohama, Komatsu, Kato, Hertz a

PT Astra Honda Motor

PT Astra Honda Motor (AHM) is a manufacturing company which produces motorcyle of Honda brand. A collaboration of strong Astra Management System and Honda high technology makes AHM the leading company in motorcycle market in indonesia. Now PT. Astra Honda Motor becoming Indonesia leading company in

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

C(ADF CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, C(ADF has faced 0 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, C(ADF has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as CAF is a global leader in comprehensive transportation systems, shaping the future of sustainable mobility. More and more cities worldwide choose us as their strategic partner to tackle the challenges of mobility and decarbonisation of transport. Continuous innovation is the cornerstone of our company, enabling us to develop advanced solutions that meet the evolving needs of our customers. This has positioned CAF at the forefront of sustainable mobility as a benchmark company in global accessible rail markets and as the European leader in the zero-emission urban bus segment. These achievements would not be possible without the dedication of our workforce: a 16,000-strong team across more than 60 countries who demonstrate a firm commitment to excellence and quality. They are the driving force behind our success and ability to innovate and lead in sustainable mobility. Together, we are building a greener and more efficient future, transforming the way we move the world, and making a positive contribution to the well-being of the planet and its people. We know itโ€™s time to step forward. Note: This is the official LinkedIn account of CAF Group that integrates the different legal entities that operate under CAF brand..

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge