Comparison Overview

CAE

VS

Airbus

CAE

8585, Chemin de la Côte-de-liesse, Montréal, H4T 1G6, CA
Last Update: 2026-04-02
Between 750 and 799

At CAE, we exist to make the world safer. We deliver cutting-edge training, simulation, and critical operations solutions to prepare aviation professionals and defence forces for the moments that matter. Every day, we empower pilots, cabin crew, maintenance technicians, airlines, business aviation operators, and defence and security personnel to perform at their best and when the stakes are the highest. Around the globe, we’re everywhere customers need us to be with approximately 13,000 employees at around 240 sites and training locations in over 40 countries. For nearly 80 years, CAE has been at the forefront of innovation, consistently seeking to set the standard by delivering excellence in high-fidelity flight simulators and training solutions, while embedding sustainability at the heart of everything we do. By harnessing technology and enhancing human performance, we strive to be the trusted partner in advancing safety and mission readiness - today and tomorrow.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 12,140
Subsidiaries: 3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Airbus

BP 90112, Blagnac Cedex, FR, 31703
Last Update: 2026-04-04
Between 800 and 849

Airbus pioneers sustainable aerospace for a safe and united world. The Company constantly innovates to provide efficient and technologically-advanced solutions in aerospace, defence, and connected services. In commercial aircraft, Airbus designs and manufactures modern and fuel-efficient airliners and associated services. Airbus is also a European leader in space systems, defence and security. In helicopters, Airbus provides efficient civil and military rotorcraft solutions and services worldwide.

NAICS: 3364
NAICS Definition: Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing
Employees: 84,573
Subsidiaries: 6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cae.jpeg
CAE
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CAE
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Airbus
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CAE in 2026.

Incidents vs Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Airbus in 2026.

Incident History — CAE (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CAE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Airbus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Airbus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cae.jpeg
CAE
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/airbusgroup.jpeg
Airbus
Incidents

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Improper handling of null bytes in the Wing FTP Server’s web interface
Motivation: Gain complete control over the system
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Airbus company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CAE company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Airbus company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas CAE company has not reported any.

In the current year, Airbus company and CAE company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Airbus company nor CAE company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Airbus company nor CAE company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Airbus company nor CAE company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Airbus company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while CAE company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Airbus company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CAE company.

Airbus company employs more people globally than CAE company, reflecting its scale as a Aviation and Aerospace Component Manufacturing.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CAE nor Airbus holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H