C1000 Company Cyber Security Posture
c1000.nlC1000 bestaat inmiddels meer dan 130 jaar en heeft vele ontwikkelingen doorlopen. Zowel in de organisatie als de supermarkten zelf. C1000 bv bestond jarenlang onder de naam Schuitema. In 2009 is besloten om de naam Schuitema om te zetten naar C1000. Schuitema begon eind 1800 toen Jacob Schuitema een kleine winkel in levensmiddelen startte. Al snel groeide de winkel uit tot een groot bedrijf en werd de firma Gebroeders D. Schuitema opgericht. Hierna werd VFB gesticht waarin groothandel en detailhandel gingen samenwerken. Eind jaren '90 werd het C1000-huismerk geïntroduceerd, in 2000 werd supermarktketen A&P overgenomen. In 2009 nam concurrent Jumbo de supermarktketen Super de Boer over; dit bedrijf verkoopt 80 Super de Boer-winkels door aan Schuitema. Op 1 april 2010 gaat de eerste omgebouwde Super de Boer als C1000 over. Deze winkel is ook gelijk in geheel nieuwe stijl: ‘C1000 Rood’. Met Jumbo start Schuitema de inkooporganisatie Bijeen. Hiermee creëren beide bedrijven een sterke inkooppositie in Nederland. In de loop van 2010 doet Schuitema afstand van de naam Schuitema en gaat het bedrijf verder als C1000. C1000 wil krachtig blijven groeien en bereikt dat met ondernemende, ambitieuze, vakbekwame en betrokken medewerkers die intensief samenwerken met de C1000-ondernemers en met sterke, betrouwbare leveranciers en partners. Onze visie: zo zien wij de toekomst C1000 heeft met haar onderscheidende winkelformule een geheel eigen positie verworven die de komende jaren verder zal worden uitgebouwd. C1000 blijft zich samen met de supermarktondernemers dan ook richten op groei, op de ontwikkeling van mensen en organisatie. C1000 zet lijnen uit, de lokale invulling vindt plaats op de winkelvloer. Samen geven we vorm aan C1000, de supermarkt waarvan wij allemaal doordrongen zijn dat het gewoonweg de allerbeste supermarkt is. Die overtuiging is uiteindelijke de ultieme basis voor groei en succes.
C1000 Company Details
c1000
10,001+ employees
0
452
Retail
c1000.nl
1
C10_5260994
In-progress
C1000 Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
C1000 Global Score.png)
C1000 Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
C1000 Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
C1000 Company Subsidiaries
C1000 bestaat inmiddels meer dan 130 jaar en heeft vele ontwikkelingen doorlopen. Zowel in de organisatie als de supermarkten zelf. C1000 bv bestond jarenlang onder de naam Schuitema. In 2009 is besloten om de naam Schuitema om te zetten naar C1000. Schuitema begon eind 1800 toen Jacob Schuitema een kleine winkel in levensmiddelen startte. Al snel groeide de winkel uit tot een groot bedrijf en werd de firma Gebroeders D. Schuitema opgericht. Hierna werd VFB gesticht waarin groothandel en detailhandel gingen samenwerken. Eind jaren '90 werd het C1000-huismerk geïntroduceerd, in 2000 werd supermarktketen A&P overgenomen. In 2009 nam concurrent Jumbo de supermarktketen Super de Boer over; dit bedrijf verkoopt 80 Super de Boer-winkels door aan Schuitema. Op 1 april 2010 gaat de eerste omgebouwde Super de Boer als C1000 over. Deze winkel is ook gelijk in geheel nieuwe stijl: ‘C1000 Rood’. Met Jumbo start Schuitema de inkooporganisatie Bijeen. Hiermee creëren beide bedrijven een sterke inkooppositie in Nederland. In de loop van 2010 doet Schuitema afstand van de naam Schuitema en gaat het bedrijf verder als C1000. C1000 wil krachtig blijven groeien en bereikt dat met ondernemende, ambitieuze, vakbekwame en betrokken medewerkers die intensief samenwerken met de C1000-ondernemers en met sterke, betrouwbare leveranciers en partners. Onze visie: zo zien wij de toekomst C1000 heeft met haar onderscheidende winkelformule een geheel eigen positie verworven die de komende jaren verder zal worden uitgebouwd. C1000 blijft zich samen met de supermarktondernemers dan ook richten op groei, op de ontwikkeling van mensen en organisatie. C1000 zet lijnen uit, de lokale invulling vindt plaats op de winkelvloer. Samen geven we vorm aan C1000, de supermarkt waarvan wij allemaal doordrongen zijn dat het gewoonweg de allerbeste supermarkt is. Die overtuiging is uiteindelijke de ultieme basis voor groei en succes.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
C1000 Cyber Security News
Contracts for September 2, 2022
This contract is a continuation of services for work performed at Sigonella Air Base, Italy, and is expected to be completed by Sept. 30, 2023.
C1000 Similar Companies
Gap
In 1969, Don and Doris Fisher opened the first Gap store on Ocean Avenue in San Francisco. They wanted to make it easier to find a great pair of jeans, and they did. Their denim and records store was a hit, and it grew to become one of the world’s most iconic brands. Today we’re represented in m
Imtiaz
As a market leader in the retail industry, Imtiaz is committed to pushing boundaries and redefining standards. Our team thrives on challenge and embraces the opportunity to make a meaningful impact on retail industry and beyond. At Imtiaz, diversity and inclusion are at the core of who we are. We be
Walmart
Sixty years ago, Sam Walton started a single mom-and-pop shop and transformed it into the world’s biggest retailer. Since those founding days, one thing has remained consistent: our commitment to helping our customers save money so they can live better. Today, we’re reinventing the shopping experien
AS Watson
AS Watson Group, the world’s largest international health and beauty retailer, is operating over 16,800 stores under 12 retail brands in 30 markets, with over 130,000 employees worldwide. For the fiscal year 2023, AS Watson Group recorded revenue of US$23 billion. Every year, we are serving over 6 b
Massimo Dutti
Massimo Dutti (Inditex Group) was founded in 1985 and was acquired by Inditex in 1991. It now has over 700 stores in more than 72 countries. The brand was originally aimed at men's fashion. Starting in 1995, women's fashion was launched in all its dimensions: from the most urban lines to the more c
InkaFarma
En Inkafarma, somos más de 11,000 colaboradores a nivel nacional con la misión de llevar con calidez y optimismo: salud, bienestar y ahorro a todas las comunidades del Perú. Ofrecemos una completa variedad de productos farmacéuticos, perfumería y tocador de excelente calidad y a los mejores precios
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
C1000 CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, C1000 has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, C1000 has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as C1000 bestaat inmiddels meer dan 130 jaar en heeft vele ontwikkelingen doorlopen. Zowel in de organisatie als de supermarkten zelf. C1000 bv bestond jarenlang onder de naam Schuitema. In 2009 is besloten om de naam Schuitema om te zetten naar C1000. Schuitema begon eind 1800 toen Jacob Schuitema een kleine winkel in levensmiddelen startte. Al snel groeide de winkel uit tot een groot bedrijf en werd de firma Gebroeders D. Schuitema opgericht. Hierna werd VFB gesticht waarin groothandel en detailhandel gingen samenwerken. Eind jaren '90 werd het C1000-huismerk geïntroduceerd, in 2000 werd supermarktketen A&P overgenomen. In 2009 nam concurrent Jumbo de supermarktketen Super de Boer over; dit bedrijf verkoopt 80 Super de Boer-winkels door aan Schuitema. Op 1 april 2010 gaat de eerste omgebouwde Super de Boer als C1000 over. Deze winkel is ook gelijk in geheel nieuwe stijl: ‘C1000 Rood’. Met Jumbo start Schuitema de inkooporganisatie Bijeen. Hiermee creëren beide bedrijven een sterke inkooppositie in Nederland. In de loop van 2010 doet Schuitema afstand van de naam Schuitema en gaat het bedrijf verder als C1000. C1000 wil krachtig blijven groeien en bereikt dat met ondernemende, ambitieuze, vakbekwame en betrokken medewerkers die intensief samenwerken met de C1000-ondernemers en met sterke, betrouwbare leveranciers en partners. Onze visie: zo zien wij de toekomst C1000 heeft met haar onderscheidende winkelformule een geheel eigen positie verworven die de komende jaren verder zal worden uitgebouwd. C1000 blijft zich samen met de supermarktondernemers dan ook richten op groei, op de ontwikkeling van mensen en organisatie. C1000 zet lijnen uit, de lokale invulling vindt plaats op de winkelvloer. Samen geven we vorm aan C1000, de supermarkt waarvan wij allemaal doordrongen zijn dat het gewoonweg de allerbeste supermarkt is. Die overtuiging is uiteindelijke de ultieme basis voor groei en succes..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
