Brother Industries, Ltd. Company Cyber Security Posture
global.brotherWith the successful manufacturing of unique and quality products as our driving force, we have developed into a wide business field, including printers, label printers, sewing machines, industrial equipment, on-demand karaoke and more. Since we established a sales company in the United States in 1954, the Brother Group has expanded its business operations on a global basis. In order to optimize the respective functions of the most appropriate regions, we currently have manufacturing, sales, and servicing facilities in more than 40 countries and regions, and operate our business activities that meet the needs of respective areas and regions on a global basis. Our social media operation policy: ■As a Participant of Social Media 1. We will listen attentively to customers' comments. 2. We will be responsible for contents we post and will be careful to avoid misunderstanding. 3. We will pay attention not to infringe others’ rights. 4. If we ask any third party to post about Brother on social media with certain benefits (products, money, etc.), we will ask him/her to clearly mention this fact. ■To Customers and Social Media Users 1. Please note that posts made in social media do not always describe our official statement. To familiarize yourself with our official statement, please refer to Brother's official websites and press releases. 2. We will try to answer all questions promptly, but there might be cases where we and subjects that have no relation to Brother. 3.Please note that there might be cases where questions are answered by someone from the relevant department, where appropriate. 4.Posts to our official social media accounts will be erased, if judged to be an infringement of copyright, information leak, advertising purpose or other illegal, unethical or inappropriate (including but not limited to obscene, slanderous, vulgar, defamatory, threatening, mean, abusive or hateful content).
BIL Company Details
brother-industries-ltd-
505 employees
4201.0
335
Appliances, Electrical, and Electronics Manufacturing
global.brother
Scan still pending
BRO_8465497
In-progress
BIL Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
BIL Global Score.png)
Brother Industries, Ltd. Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Brother Industries, Ltd. Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Brother Industries | Vulnerability | 25 | 6/2025 | BRO611062825 | Link | ||
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromisedDescription: Brother Industries is facing a critical authentication bypass vulnerability affecting hundreds of printer models, primarily used in enterprises. This vulnerability allows unauthenticated remote code execution (RCE) on the devices when combined with another flaw. The issue stems from a manufacturing defect and cannot be resolved through firmware updates, as reported by Rapid7. Additionally, one of the discovered vulnerabilities enables attackers to extract the serial number of a printer, which is a significant concern for the company. | |||||||
Brother Industries, Ltd. Company Subsidiaries
With the successful manufacturing of unique and quality products as our driving force, we have developed into a wide business field, including printers, label printers, sewing machines, industrial equipment, on-demand karaoke and more. Since we established a sales company in the United States in 1954, the Brother Group has expanded its business operations on a global basis. In order to optimize the respective functions of the most appropriate regions, we currently have manufacturing, sales, and servicing facilities in more than 40 countries and regions, and operate our business activities that meet the needs of respective areas and regions on a global basis. Our social media operation policy: ■As a Participant of Social Media 1. We will listen attentively to customers' comments. 2. We will be responsible for contents we post and will be careful to avoid misunderstanding. 3. We will pay attention not to infringe others’ rights. 4. If we ask any third party to post about Brother on social media with certain benefits (products, money, etc.), we will ask him/her to clearly mention this fact. ■To Customers and Social Media Users 1. Please note that posts made in social media do not always describe our official statement. To familiarize yourself with our official statement, please refer to Brother's official websites and press releases. 2. We will try to answer all questions promptly, but there might be cases where we and subjects that have no relation to Brother. 3.Please note that there might be cases where questions are answered by someone from the relevant department, where appropriate. 4.Posts to our official social media accounts will be erased, if judged to be an infringement of copyright, information leak, advertising purpose or other illegal, unethical or inappropriate (including but not limited to obscene, slanderous, vulgar, defamatory, threatening, mean, abusive or hateful content).
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
BIL Cyber Security News
Multiple Brother Device Vulnerabilities Allow Attackers to Execute Arbitrary HTTP Requests
A zero-day research project has uncovered eight new vulnerabilities in multifunction printers (MFPs) and related devices from Brother ...
Multiple brother devices: Multiple vulnerabilities (FIXED)
Security researcher Rapid7 has uncovered 8 vulnerabilities in 742 printer models from Brother, FUJIFILM, Ricoh, and Toshiba, with fixes now ...
Big Brother Fears over Chinese Security Software in Bosnia’s Republika Srpska
Concern is growing over a cyber-security software deal between the Republika Srpska entity in Bosnia and Herzegovina and China's ELINC, owned by ...
The Sanders brothers are stealing the spotlight and NFL fans are loving every second
When it comes to sibling rivalries, the Sanders brothers just keep giving, this time with a joke that had NFL Twitter absolutely losing it.
Hack of Contractor Was at Root of Massive Federal Data Breach
Failures in cybersecurity practices at a software company that helps federal agencies manage investigations and FOIA requests allowed two ...
The top 10 cybersecurity companies in the U.S.
The top 10 cybersecurity companies in the U.S. · 10. Okta Inc. (OKTA) · 9. Zscaler (ZS) · 8. Cloudflare, Inc. (NET) · 7. Fortinet (FTNT) · 6.
Top 10 Largest Cybersecurity Companies
Cyber Magazine therefore takes a look at those companies with the widest footprint, by examining the top 10 largest cybersecurity companies.
Techie crashes brother’s BMW in Hyderabad; high-speed mishap caught on camera, biker escapes unhurt
Mohd Umar Khalid, a software engineer from Germany, faces charges for dangerous driving in Madhapur. He allegedly lost control of his BMW, ...
TAC InfoSec adds 200 new clients across 32 countries in September
TAC InfoSec Limited (TAC Security) is a cybersecurity company specialising in vulnerability management. It is India's first publicly listed ...
BIL Similar Companies
Belton Technology Group
Established in 1988, Belton Technology Group is ISO 9001, 14001, QS9000 certified and UL listed components and full turnkey contract manufacturer of - Flexible Printed Circuit Boards - SMT Flip Chip, PCB and FPCB Assemblies - Micro Module Packaging and Assemblies - Plastic Injection and Ov
nVent Electrical & Fastening Solutions
We are a global leader in electrical components for electrical protection, rail and transit connectivity, telecom installation, and utility and industrial facility electrical installation systems. Our products connect and protect our customers’ systems in facilities where the cost of failure is ve
Foxconn
Established in Taiwan in 1974, Hon Hai Technology Group (Foxconn) (2317: Taiwan) is the world’s largest electronics manufacturer. Foxconn is also the leading technological solution provider, and it continuously leverages its expertise in software and hardware to integrate its unique manufacturing sy
FCI Electronics
FCI Electronics (2011 sales: € 420 M and 6,679 employees), one of the FCI divisions, is well known and respected for its technology leadership and innovative connector and cable assembly solutions. FCI Electronics has a global presence and resources in Asia, Americas and Europe to serve our custom
Panasonic
Founded in 1918, and today a global leader in developing innovative technologies and solutions for wide-ranging applications in the consumer electronics, housing, automotive, industry, communications, and energy sectors worldwide, the Panasonic Group switched to an operating company system on April
Tianma Microelectronics
Tianma Micro-electronics Co., Ltd (Tianma) specializes in providing display solutions and efficient support services worldwide. We were originally established in 1983 and publicly listed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange (SZ. 000050) in 1995. Our company is committed to providing leading technology
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
BIL CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, BIL has faced 1 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Vulnerability'].
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as With the successful manufacturing of unique and quality products as our driving force, we have developed into a wide business field, including printers, label printers, sewing machines, industrial equipment, on-demand karaoke and more. Since we established a sales company in the United States in 1954, the Brother Group has expanded its business operations on a global basis. In order to optimize the respective functions of the most appropriate regions, we currently have manufacturing, sales, and servicing facilities in more than 40 countries and regions, and operate our business activities that meet the needs of respective areas and regions on a global basis. Our social media operation policy: ■As a Participant of Social Media 1. We will listen attentively to customers' comments. 2. We will be responsible for contents we post and will be careful to avoid misunderstanding. 3. We will pay attention not to infringe others’ rights. 4. If we ask any third party to post about Brother on social media with certain benefits (products, money, etc.), we will ask him/her to clearly mention this fact. ■To Customers and Social Media Users 1. Please note that posts made in social media do not always describe our official statement. To familiarize yourself with our official statement, please refer to Brother's official websites and press releases. 2. We will try to answer all questions promptly, but there might be cases where we and subjects that have no relation to Brother. 3.Please note that there might be cases where questions are answered by someone from the relevant department, where appropriate. 4.Posts to our official social media accounts will be erased, if judged to be an infringement of copyright, information leak, advertising purpose or other illegal, unethical or inappropriate (including but not limited to obscene, slanderous, vulgar, defamatory, threatening, mean, abusive or hateful content)..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
