Comparison Overview

Bharat Forge Ltd

VS

Danfoss

Bharat Forge Ltd

Mundawa, Pune, 411036, IN
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799

Bharat Forge Limited (BFL), the Pune based Indian multinational is a technology driven global leader in metal forming having transcontinental presence across eight manufacturing locations, serving several sectors including automotive, power, oil and gas, construction & mining, locomotive, marine and aerospace. Part of Kalyani Group with 10000 plus global work forces; BFL today has the largest repository of metallurgical knowledge in the region and offer full service supply capability to its geographically dispersed marquee customers from concept to product design, engineering, manufacturing, testing and validation. The world’s largest forging company with manufacturing facilities spread across India, Germany and Sweden, Bharat Forge manufactures a wide range of high performance, critical and safety components for the automotive and non-automotive sector. It is India’s largest manufacturer and exporter of automotive components and leading chassis component manufacturer in the world. BFL’s customer base includes virtually every global automotive OEM and Tier 1 supplier. As we expand our expertise across sectors our vision is clear- We’re building India’s Economic backbone, strengthening national capabilities and ensuring a bigger global imprint- for ourselves and our country.

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 5,029
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Danfoss

Nordborgvej 81, Nordborg, DK, 6430
Last Update: 2026-03-26
Between 750 and 799

Danfoss engineers solutions that increase machine productivity, reduce emissions, lower energy consumption, and enable electrification. Our solutions are used in such areas as refrigeration, air conditioning, heating, power conversion, motor control, industrial machinery, automotive, marine, and off- and on-highway equipment. We also provide solutions for renewable energy, such as solar and wind power, as well as district-energy infrastructure for cities. Our innovative engineering dates back to 1933. Danfoss is family-owned, employing more than 39,000 people, serving customers in more than 100 countries through a global footprint of 100 factories. Follow us on Instagram, Twitter and Facebook: www.instagram.com/danfoss_group www.twitter.com/Danfoss www.facebook.com/Danfoss

NAICS: 3332
NAICS Definition: Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees: 22,778
Subsidiaries: 9
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bharat-forge-ltd.jpeg
Bharat Forge Ltd
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Bharat Forge Ltd
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Danfoss
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bharat Forge Ltd in 2026.

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

Danfoss has 58.33% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Bharat Forge Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bharat Forge Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Danfoss (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danfoss cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bharat-forge-ltd.jpeg
Bharat Forge Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/danfoss.jpeg
Danfoss
Incidents

Date Detected: 2/2026
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Distributed Denial-of-Service (DDoS)
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Danfoss company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Bharat Forge Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Danfoss company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Bharat Forge Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, Danfoss company has reported more cyber incidents than Bharat Forge Ltd company.

Neither Danfoss company nor Bharat Forge Ltd company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Danfoss company nor Bharat Forge Ltd company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Danfoss company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Bharat Forge Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd company nor Danfoss company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Danfoss company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Bharat Forge Ltd company.

Danfoss company employs more people globally than Bharat Forge Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Industrial Machinery Manufacturing.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Bharat Forge Ltd nor Danfoss holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in itsourcecode Payroll Management System 1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /manage_user.php of the component Parameter Handler. Performing a manipulation of the argument ID results in sql injection. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was identified in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. Affected is the function AP4_BitReader::SkipBits of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component DSI v1 Parser. Such manipulation of the argument n_presentations leads to heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be performed locally. The exploit is publicly available and might be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was determined in Axiomatic Bento4 up to 1.6.0-641. This impacts the function AP4_BitReader::ReadCache of the file Ap4Dac4Atom.cpp of the component MP4 File Parser. This manipulation causes heap-based buffer overflow. The attack needs to be launched locally. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a heap-buffer-overflow (HBO) in icAnsiToUtf8() in the XML conversion path. The issue is triggered by a crafted ICC profile which causes icAnsiToUtf8(std::string&, char const*) to treat an input buffer as a C-string and call operations that rely on strlen()/null-termination. AddressSanitizer reports an out-of-bounds READ of size 115 past a 114-byte heap allocation, with the failure observed while running the iccToXml tool. This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

iccDEV provides a set of libraries and tools for working with ICC color management profiles. Prior to version 2.3.1.6, there is a stack-buffer-overflow (SBO) in CIccTagFixedNum<>::GetValues() and a related bug chain. The primary crash is an AddressSanitizer-reported WRITE of size 4 that overflows a 4-byte stack variable (rv) via the call chain CIccTagFixedNum::GetValues() -> CIccTagStruct::GetElemNumberValue(). This issue has been patched in version 2.3.1.6.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H