Badge
11,371 badges added since 01 January 2025
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions

From local communities to global markets, we are dedicated to shaping the future responsibly and helping clients thrive in a changing world. “Bank of America Merrill Lynch” is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets businesses of Bank of America Corporation. Bank of America is a marketing name for the Retirement Services business of Bank of America Corporation. Lending, derivatives, and other commercial banking activities are performed globally by banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation, including Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC. Securities, strategic advisory, and other investment banking activities are performed globally by investment banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation (“Investment Banking Affiliates”), including, in the United States, BofA Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., all of which are registered broker-dealers and Members of SIPC, and in other jurisdictions, by locally registered entities. BofA Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. are registered as futures commission merchants with the CFTC and are members of the NFA.   Investment products: Are Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value Are Not Bank Guaranteed Any opinions, views, statements, estimates or projections (“posts”) posted on this web page are solely those of the individual author(s). As such, posts by an employee of BofAML or any of its affiliates are solely those of such employee or agent and do not necessarily reflect the views of BofAML. BofAML is not responsible for the content, or output of external websites. For Terms and Conditions and Disclaimers, please visit go.bofaml.com/social. Bank of America LinkedIn Community Guidelines can be found at: http://about.bankofamerica.com/en-us/social-media/linkedin-community-guidelines.html

Bank of America Merrill Lynch A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

BAML

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

bank-of-america-merrill-lynch

Employees number:

16,629

Number of followers:

378,410

NAICS:

52

Industry Type:

Financial Services

Homepage:

bofaml.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

BAN_2040524

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreBAML Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 750 and 799

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america-merrill-lynch.jpeg
BAML Financial Services
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
Get a Score Increase
globalscoreBAML Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/bank-of-america-merrill-lynch.jpeg
BAML Financial Services
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

BAML Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
5
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsSupply Chain SourceIncident DetailsView
Bank of AmericaCyber Attack85312/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Sophisticated Keylogger Attack Targets Major U.S. Bank’s Employee Store, Exposing 200,000 to Credential Theft Cybersecurity researchers have identified a highly targeted keylogger attack on the employee store of one of America’s largest banks, compromising sensitive data for over 200,000 employees. The malware intercepted all form inputs including login credentials, payment card details, and personal information raising concerns about potential lateral movement into the bank’s internal systems. The attack exploited a critical gap in enterprise security: employee-facing ecommerce platforms, which often fall outside standard security audits despite handling corporate credentials. Since bank employees frequently have elevated access to financial systems, such platforms become prime targets for threat actors seeking initial footholds in banking infrastructure. The malware used a two-stage loader to evade detection. The first stage employed character code obfuscation to verify users had reached checkout pages before fetching a secondary harvesting script from *js-csp.com/getInjector/*. The second stage systematically extracted form data including input fields, dropdown menus, and text areas before exfiltrating stolen credentials via image beacon requests to bypass security controls. At the time of discovery, only 1 of 97 security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the malicious infrastructure, highlighting a significant detection gap for ecommerce-specific threats. The attack pattern mirrors previous campaigns, including one targeting the Green Bay Packers, and marks the fifth *getInjector* campaign detected in the past year. The *js-csp.com* domain was registered in late December 2025, with the compromise identified within weeks of deployment. The bank’s response was delayed due to the absence of a *security.txt* file, a standard channel for responsible disclosure. Despite researchers’ attempts to notify the bank via email and LinkedIn, the lack of formal security contacts hindered remediation efforts. The incident underscores the need for organizations to monitor client-side scripts, include internal ecommerce platforms in security audits, and deploy specialized threat detection for this emerging attack surface.

Bank of America Merrill LynchBreach5022/2025NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach related to Bank of America on March 3, 2025, involving an inadvertent disclosure that occurred on February 18, 2025. One individual was affected, and the compromised information included personal details such as names and Social Security numbers. Bank of America offered a complimentary two-year identity theft protection service by Experian.

Bank of America Merrill LynchBreach85410/2024NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting Bank of America, detected on October 1, 2024, and reported on January 3, 2025. The incident involved unauthorized access to sensitive personal information, compromising 414 individuals, including at least one Maine resident. While the exact nature of the exposed data was not fully detailed, the breach was severe enough to warrant 24 months of free identity theft protection services via Experian, suggesting the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) that could facilitate fraud or identity theft. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in Bank of America’s data security measures, raising concerns over potential financial fraud, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny. Although the scale (414 individuals) is relatively contained compared to mass breaches, the provision of long-term identity protection indicates a high-risk exposure likely involving financial or identity-related data (e.g., Social Security numbers, account details, or addresses). The incident underscores the persistent threat of cyber intrusions targeting financial institutions, where even limited breaches can have cascading consequences for affected individuals, including phishing attacks, unauthorized transactions, or credit fraud.

Bank of America Merrill LynchBreach6034/2024NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: On April 16, 2024, the Maine Office of the Attorney General disclosed that Bank of America suffered an inadvertent data breach caused by a Merrill employee’s email error, leading to the unauthorized exposure of customer information. The incident impacted 2,676 individuals, including 18 Maine residents, though the exact nature of the exposed data (e.g., financial details, personal identifiers) was not fully specified. In response, Bank of America offered affected individuals two years of complimentary identity theft protection via Experian IdentityWorks™ to mitigate potential risks such as fraud or identity misuse. The breach did not involve malicious cyber activity like hacking or ransomware but stemmed from human error, highlighting vulnerabilities in internal data-handling protocols. While no evidence suggested exploitation of the exposed data, the incident underscored the reputational and operational risks associated with employee-driven data leaks, particularly for a major financial institution. The breach’s scope though limited in scale raised concerns about compliance with data protection regulations and the bank’s ability to safeguard sensitive customer information.

Bank of America Merrill LynchData Leak85304/2020NA
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Business clients applying for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans with Bank of America have had their personal and business information exposed in a data breach. The data breach occurred on April 22 as Bank of America uploaded customers’ PPP loan applications to the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) online testing system, which allowed lenders to test application submissions. During the testing process, Application information was potentially visible to other lenders and their third-party vendors. The exposed data included both business and clients’ personal information. The affected business data may include business names, addresses, and tax identification numbers. Affected personal data may include names, addresses, Social Security numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, and citizenship information.

Major U.S. Bank: New Malware Targets 200,000+ U.S. Bank Employees to Steal Login Credentials
Cyber Attack
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 12/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Sophisticated Keylogger Attack Targets Major U.S. Bank’s Employee Store, Exposing 200,000 to Credential Theft Cybersecurity researchers have identified a highly targeted keylogger attack on the employee store of one of America’s largest banks, compromising sensitive data for over 200,000 employees. The malware intercepted all form inputs including login credentials, payment card details, and personal information raising concerns about potential lateral movement into the bank’s internal systems. The attack exploited a critical gap in enterprise security: employee-facing ecommerce platforms, which often fall outside standard security audits despite handling corporate credentials. Since bank employees frequently have elevated access to financial systems, such platforms become prime targets for threat actors seeking initial footholds in banking infrastructure. The malware used a two-stage loader to evade detection. The first stage employed character code obfuscation to verify users had reached checkout pages before fetching a secondary harvesting script from *js-csp.com/getInjector/*. The second stage systematically extracted form data including input fields, dropdown menus, and text areas before exfiltrating stolen credentials via image beacon requests to bypass security controls. At the time of discovery, only 1 of 97 security vendors on VirusTotal flagged the malicious infrastructure, highlighting a significant detection gap for ecommerce-specific threats. The attack pattern mirrors previous campaigns, including one targeting the Green Bay Packers, and marks the fifth *getInjector* campaign detected in the past year. The *js-csp.com* domain was registered in late December 2025, with the compromise identified within weeks of deployment. The bank’s response was delayed due to the absence of a *security.txt* file, a standard channel for responsible disclosure. Despite researchers’ attempts to notify the bank via email and LinkedIn, the lack of formal security contacts hindered remediation efforts. The incident underscores the need for organizations to monitor client-side scripts, include internal ecommerce platforms in security audits, and deploy specialized threat detection for this emerging attack surface.

Bank of America
Breach
Severity: 50
Impact: 2
Seen: 2/2025
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach related to Bank of America on March 3, 2025, involving an inadvertent disclosure that occurred on February 18, 2025. One individual was affected, and the compromised information included personal details such as names and Social Security numbers. Bank of America offered a complimentary two-year identity theft protection service by Experian.

Bank of America
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 10/2024
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General disclosed a data breach affecting Bank of America, detected on October 1, 2024, and reported on January 3, 2025. The incident involved unauthorized access to sensitive personal information, compromising 414 individuals, including at least one Maine resident. While the exact nature of the exposed data was not fully detailed, the breach was severe enough to warrant 24 months of free identity theft protection services via Experian, suggesting the exposure of personally identifiable information (PII) that could facilitate fraud or identity theft. The breach highlights vulnerabilities in Bank of America’s data security measures, raising concerns over potential financial fraud, reputational damage, and regulatory scrutiny. Although the scale (414 individuals) is relatively contained compared to mass breaches, the provision of long-term identity protection indicates a high-risk exposure likely involving financial or identity-related data (e.g., Social Security numbers, account details, or addresses). The incident underscores the persistent threat of cyber intrusions targeting financial institutions, where even limited breaches can have cascading consequences for affected individuals, including phishing attacks, unauthorized transactions, or credit fraud.

Merrill, A Bank of America Company
Breach
Severity: 60
Impact: 3
Seen: 4/2024
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: On April 16, 2024, the Maine Office of the Attorney General disclosed that Bank of America suffered an inadvertent data breach caused by a Merrill employee’s email error, leading to the unauthorized exposure of customer information. The incident impacted 2,676 individuals, including 18 Maine residents, though the exact nature of the exposed data (e.g., financial details, personal identifiers) was not fully specified. In response, Bank of America offered affected individuals two years of complimentary identity theft protection via Experian IdentityWorks™ to mitigate potential risks such as fraud or identity misuse. The breach did not involve malicious cyber activity like hacking or ransomware but stemmed from human error, highlighting vulnerabilities in internal data-handling protocols. While no evidence suggested exploitation of the exposed data, the incident underscored the reputational and operational risks associated with employee-driven data leaks, particularly for a major financial institution. The breach’s scope though limited in scale raised concerns about compliance with data protection regulations and the bank’s ability to safeguard sensitive customer information.

Bank of America
Data Leak
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 04/2020
Blog:
Supply Chain Source: NA
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Business clients applying for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans with Bank of America have had their personal and business information exposed in a data breach. The data breach occurred on April 22 as Bank of America uploaded customers’ PPP loan applications to the Small Business Administration’s (SBA) online testing system, which allowed lenders to test application submissions. During the testing process, Application information was potentially visible to other lenders and their third-party vendors. The exposed data included both business and clients’ personal information. The affected business data may include business names, addresses, and tax identification numbers. Affected personal data may include names, addresses, Social Security numbers, phone numbers, email addresses, and citizenship information.

Ailogo

BAML Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for BAML

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in 2026.

Incident Types BAML vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bank of America Merrill Lynch in 2026.

Incident History — BAML (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BAML cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

BAML Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

From local communities to global markets, we are dedicated to shaping the future responsibly and helping clients thrive in a changing world. “Bank of America Merrill Lynch” is the marketing name for the global banking and global markets businesses of Bank of America Corporation. Bank of America is a marketing name for the Retirement Services business of Bank of America Corporation. Lending, derivatives, and other commercial banking activities are performed globally by banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation, including Bank of America, N.A., Member FDIC. Securities, strategic advisory, and other investment banking activities are performed globally by investment banking affiliates of Bank of America Corporation (“Investment Banking Affiliates”), including, in the United States, BofA Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated, and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp., all of which are registered broker-dealers and Members of SIPC, and in other jurisdictions, by locally registered entities. BofA Securities, Inc., Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Incorporated and Merrill Lynch Professional Clearing Corp. are registered as futures commission merchants with the CFTC and are members of the NFA.   Investment products: Are Not FDIC Insured May Lose Value Are Not Bank Guaranteed Any opinions, views, statements, estimates or projections (“posts”) posted on this web page are solely those of the individual author(s). As such, posts by an employee of BofAML or any of its affiliates are solely those of such employee or agent and do not necessarily reflect the views of BofAML. BofAML is not responsible for the content, or output of external websites. For Terms and Conditions and Disclaimers, please visit go.bofaml.com/social. Bank of America LinkedIn Community Guidelines can be found at: http://about.bankofamerica.com/en-us/social-media/linkedin-community-guidelines.html

Loading...
similarCompanies

BAML Similar Companies

Westpac Group

From rescue helicopters to signing the Equator Principles, from paying super during parental leave to adding 'Touch ID'​ biometric technology to our banking apps and being first on the scene with a helping hand in times of crisis... we have a proud history of stepping up to be first for our customer

Merrill Lynch

Founded in 1914, Merrill is one of the largest wealth management businesses in the world. Merrill financial advisors combine financial knowledge and experience with a deep understanding of their clients’ needs to help their clients pursue the lives they want. With a deep commitment to placing their

JPMorganChase

With a history tracing its roots to 1799 in New York City, JPMorganChase is one of the world's oldest, largest, and best-known financial institutions—carrying forth the innovative spirit of our heritage firms in global operations across 100 markets. We serve millions of customers and many of the w

Nationale-Nederlanden

NN Group is an international financial services company, active in 10 countries, with a strong presence in a number of European countries and Japan. Our roots lie in the Netherlands, with a rich history of more than 175 years. With our 15,000 employees, NN Group provides retirement services, pensio

First American

First American Financial Corporation is a premier provider of title, settlement and risk solutions for real estate transactions. With its combination of financial strength and stability built over more than 130 years, innovative proprietary technologies, and unmatched data assets, the company is lea

J.P. Morgan

J.P. Morgan is a leader in financial services, offering solutions to clients in more than 100 countries with one of the most comprehensive global product platforms available. We have been helping our clients to do business and manage their wealth for more than 200 years. Our business has been built

Prudential Financial

Prudential Financial (NYSE:PRU) was founded on the belief that financial security should be within reach for everyone, and for over 140 years, we have helped our customers reach their potential and tackle life's challenges for now and future generations to come. Today, we are one of the world’s larg

PT. Pegadaian

PT Pegadaian didirikan di kota Sukabumi, Jawa Barat pada 1 April 1901. Tak hanya bergerak di Industri Gadai, Pegadaian juga memiliki ragam produk dan layanan seperti investasi berbasis emas yang dapat dimiliki oleh masyarakat dengan cara yang mudah, diantaranya Tabungan Emas, Cicil Emas dan Arisan

From gaining new experiences in different roles to acquiring fresh knowledge and skills – at UBS we believe that you should never stop growing and learning because life never stops teaching. We know that it's our people – with their unique backgrounds, skills, experience levels and interests – who d

newsone

BAML CyberSecurity News

March 19, 2026 07:00 AM
The best high-yield savings accounts of March 2026

Editor's Note: APYs listed in this article are up-to-date as of the time of publication. CNBC Select will update as changes are made public.

January 28, 2026 08:00 AM
SPA Names Raj Badhwar as CIO

Systems Planning & Analysis has appointed Raj Badhwar as its chief information officer, placing a longtime cybersecurity and technology...

September 18, 2025 07:00 AM
Hexagon’s Octave spin-off brings veteran team to tackle industrial complexity with data, AI

Octave, the proposed software spin-off from Hexagon AB, announced its executive leadership team, uniting visionary leaders,...

August 11, 2025 07:00 AM
48 CIOs On the Move

This month, we're highlighting 48 CIOs, CTOs, and CISOs taking on leadership roles in industries from healthcare to finance to technology.

July 30, 2025 07:00 AM
Why Booz Allen’s CTO used generative AI to make a deepfake video of himself

Booz Allen Hamilton's CTO, Bill Vass, made a deepfake video of himself to promote greater worker skepticism of video and audio content and...

May 03, 2025 08:25 PM
Bank of America confirms data breach compromised customer data in November 2023

Who: Bank of America warned customers they may have been affected by a November 2023 data breach that occurred as a result of a cybersecurity incident...

May 01, 2025 07:00 AM
Bankers fear relay-fraud comeback and Synapse issues in May

Fintechs acquiring banks are trending once again, as are the problematic levels of relay fraud, bots conducting cyber attacks against banks...

April 10, 2025 07:00 AM
Marquis Who's Who Honors Parthasarathi Chakraborty for Excellence in Technology

Parthasarathi Chakraborty is a renowned leader with nearly 30 years of experience in cybersecurity defense and engineering.

February 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Merrill Edge Safety Review: How Secure is Your Information?

Launched by Bank of America, Merrill Edge is a secure investment app with backing from one of the largest banks in the United States.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

BAML CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Bank of America Merrill Lynch

The official website of Bank of America Merrill Lynch is http://www.bofaml.com.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 787, reflecting their Fair security posture.

How many security badges does Bank of America Merrill Lynch’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has Bank of America Merrill Lynch been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Bank of America Merrill Lynch is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Bank of America Merrill Lynch have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Bank of America Merrill Lynch is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch operates primarily in the Financial Services industry.

Number of Employees at Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch employs approximately 16,629 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s LinkedIn Followers

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 378,410 followers.

NAICS Classification of Bank of America Merrill Lynch

Bank of America Merrill Lynch is classified under the NAICS code 52, which corresponds to Finance and Insurance.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Presence on Crunchbase

No, Bank of America Merrill Lynch does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Bank of America Merrill Lynch’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Bank of America Merrill Lynch maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/bank-of-america-merrill-lynch.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Bank of America Merrill Lynch

As of April 02, 2026, Rankiteo reports that Bank of America Merrill Lynch has experienced 5 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Bank of America Merrill Lynch has an estimated 31,537 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Bank of America Merrill Lynch ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach, Cyber Attack and Data Leak.

How does Bank of America Merrill Lynch detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an third party assistance with experian, and remediation measures with complimentary two-year identity theft protection service, and incident response plan activated with likely (standard protocol for data breaches), and third party assistance with experian (identityworks™ services), and remediation measures with offering 2-year complimentary identity theft protection (experian identityworks™), and communication strategy with notification to affected individuals via maine ag report, and third party assistance with experian (identity theft protection), and communication strategy with delayed due to absence of security.txt file..

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Bank of America PPP Loan Data Breach

Description: Business clients applying for Paycheck Protection Program (PPP) loans with Bank of America have had their personal and business information exposed in a data breach.

Date Detected: April 22, 2020

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Improper Data Handling

Vulnerability Exploited: Improper Data Handling

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Bank of America Data Breach

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach related to Bank of America on March 3, 2025, involving an inadvertent disclosure that occurred on February 18, 2025. One individual was affected, and the compromised information included personal details such as names and Social Security numbers. Bank of America offered a complimentary two-year identity theft protection service by Experian.

Date Detected: 2025-02-18

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-03-03

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Inadvertent Disclosure

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure)

Title: Bank of America Inadvertent Disclosure of Customer Information via Merrill Employee Email Error

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported that Bank of America experienced an inadvertent disclosure of customer information on April 16, 2024, due to a Merrill employee email error, affecting a total of 2,676 individuals, including 18 Maine residents. Bank of America is offering a complimentary two-year membership in identity theft protection services through Experian IdentityWorks™.

Date Detected: 2024-04-16

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-04-16

Type: Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure)

Attack Vector: Human Error (Email Misconfiguration)

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Bank of America Data Breach (2024)

Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported a data breach involving Bank of America. The breach occurred on October 1, 2024, affecting 414 individuals, including 1 resident of Maine. Unauthorized access was detected, and identity theft protection services (24 months via Experian) were offered to affected individuals.

Date Detected: 2024-10-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-01-03

Type: Data Breach

Incident : Keylogger Attack

Title: Sophisticated Keylogger Attack Targets Major U.S. Bank’s Employee Store, Exposing 200,000 to Credential Theft

Description: Cybersecurity researchers have identified a highly targeted keylogger attack on the employee store of one of America’s largest banks, compromising sensitive data for over 200,000 employees. The malware intercepted all form inputs including login credentials, payment card details, and personal information, raising concerns about potential lateral movement into the bank’s internal systems. The attack exploited a critical gap in enterprise security: employee-facing ecommerce platforms, which often fall outside standard security audits despite handling corporate credentials. The malware used a two-stage loader to evade detection, systematically extracting form data before exfiltrating stolen credentials via image beacon requests to bypass security controls.

Type: Keylogger Attack

Attack Vector: Malicious script injection (client-side)

Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of security audits for employee-facing ecommerce platforms

Motivation: Credential theft for potential lateral movement into banking infrastructure

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Employee-facing ecommerce platform.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BAN2212291222

Data Compromised: Business names, Addresses, Tax identification numbers, Names, Social security numbers, Phone numbers, Email addresses, Citizenship information

Incident : Data Breach BAN832072725

Data Compromised: Names, Social security numbers

Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Data Compromised: Customer information

Brand Reputation Impact: Potential (Mitigated by Identity Theft Protection Offer)

Identity Theft Risk: High (Mitigated by Experian IdentityWorks™ Offer)

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Identity Theft Risk: True

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Data Compromised: Login credentials, payment card details, personal information

Systems Affected: Employee-facing ecommerce platform

Operational Impact: Potential lateral movement into internal banking systems

Identity Theft Risk: High

Payment Information Risk: High

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Business Names, Addresses, Tax Identification Numbers, Names, Social Security Numbers, Phone Numbers, Email Addresses, Citizenship Information, , Personal Information, , Customer Information (Details Unspecified), Login Credentials, Payment Card Details, Personal Information and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BAN2212291222

Entity Name: Bank of America

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Incident : Data Breach BAN832072725

Entity Name: Bank of America

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking

Customers Affected: 1

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Entity Name: Bank of America (via Merrill)

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking/Financial Services

Location: United States (Maine residents among affected)

Size: Large (Multinational)

Customers Affected: 2,676 (including 18 Maine residents)

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Entity Name: Bank of America

Entity Type: Financial Institution

Industry: Banking/Financial Services

Location: United States

Customers Affected: 414

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Entity Name: Major U.S. Bank (unnamed)

Entity Type: Bank

Industry: Financial Services

Location: United States

Customers Affected: 200,000 employees

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BAN832072725

Third Party Assistance: Experian.

Remediation Measures: Complimentary two-year identity theft protection service

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Incident Response Plan Activated: Likely (Standard Protocol for Data Breaches)

Third Party Assistance: Experian (Identityworks™ Services).

Remediation Measures: Offering 2-year complimentary identity theft protection (Experian IdentityWorks™)

Communication Strategy: Notification to affected individuals via Maine AG report

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Third Party Assistance: Experian (Identity Theft Protection).

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Communication Strategy: Delayed due to absence of security.txt file

What is the company's incident response plan?

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as Likely (Standard Protocol for Data Breaches).

How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response ?

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Experian, , Experian (IdentityWorks™ Services), , Experian (Identity Theft Protection), .

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach BAN2212291222

Type of Data Compromised: Business names, Addresses, Tax identification numbers, Names, Social security numbers, Phone numbers, Email addresses, Citizenship information

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach BAN832072725

Type of Data Compromised: Personal information

Number of Records Exposed: 1

Sensitivity of Data: High

Personally Identifiable Information: NamesSocial Security numbers

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Type of Data Compromised: Customer Information (Details Unspecified)

Number of Records Exposed: 2,676

Sensitivity of Data: Moderate to High (PII likely included)

Personally Identifiable Information: Likely (Given Identity Theft Protection Offer)

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Number of Records Exposed: 414

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Type of Data Compromised: Login credentials, Payment card details, Personal information

Number of Records Exposed: 200,000

Sensitivity of Data: High

Data Exfiltration: Yes (via image beacon requests)

Personally Identifiable Information: Yes

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Complimentary two-year identity theft protection service, , Offering 2-year complimentary identity theft protection (Experian IdentityWorks™), .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Regulatory Notifications: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Regulatory Notifications: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Lessons Learned: Organizations need to monitor client-side scripts, include internal ecommerce platforms in security audits, and deploy specialized threat detection for this emerging attack surface. The absence of a security.txt file hindered responsible disclosure and remediation efforts.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Recommendations: Monitor client-side scripts for malicious activity, Include employee-facing ecommerce platforms in security audits, Deploy specialized threat detection for ecommerce-specific threats, Implement a security.txt file for responsible disclosureMonitor client-side scripts for malicious activity, Include employee-facing ecommerce platforms in security audits, Deploy specialized threat detection for ecommerce-specific threats, Implement a security.txt file for responsible disclosureMonitor client-side scripts for malicious activity, Include employee-facing ecommerce platforms in security audits, Deploy specialized threat detection for ecommerce-specific threats, Implement a security.txt file for responsible disclosureMonitor client-side scripts for malicious activity, Include employee-facing ecommerce platforms in security audits, Deploy specialized threat detection for ecommerce-specific threats, Implement a security.txt file for responsible disclosure

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Organizations need to monitor client-side scripts, include internal ecommerce platforms in security audits, and deploy specialized threat detection for this emerging attack surface. The absence of a security.txt file hindered responsible disclosure and remediation efforts.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach BAN832072725

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2025-03-03

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2024-04-16

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General

Date Accessed: 2025-01-03

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Source: Cybersecurity researchers

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2025-03-03, and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2024-04-16, and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney GeneralDate Accessed: 2025-01-03, and Source: Cybersecurity researchers.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Investigation Status: Disclosed (No Further Details)

How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through Notification To Affected Individuals Via Maine Ag Report and Delayed due to absence of security.txt file.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Customer Advisories: Offer of 2-year Experian IdentityWorks™ membership

Incident : Data Breach BAN030091825

Customer Advisories: Identity theft protection services (24 months via Experian) offered to affected individuals

What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Offer Of 2-Year Experian Identityworks™ Membership, , Identity Theft Protection Services (24 Months Via Experian) Offered To Affected Individuals and .

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Entry Point: Employee-facing ecommerce platform

High Value Targets: Bank employees with elevated access to financial systems

Data Sold on Dark Web: Bank employees with elevated access to financial systems

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach (Inadvertent Disclosure) BAN721082025

Root Causes: Human Error (Merrill Employee Email Misconfiguration),

Incident : Keylogger Attack BAN1769475353

Root Causes: Lack Of Security Audits For Employee-Facing Ecommerce Platforms, Absence Of Security.Txt File For Responsible Disclosure, Detection Gap For Ecommerce-Specific Threats,

What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis ?

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Experian, , Experian (Identityworks™ Services), , Experian (Identity Theft Protection), .

Additional Questions

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on April 22, 2020.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-01-03.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Business names, Addresses, Tax identification numbers, Names, Social Security numbers, Phone numbers, Email addresses, Citizenship information, , Names, Social Security numbers, , Customer Information, , , Login credentials, payment card details and personal information.

Response to the Incidents

What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident ?

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was experian, , experian (identityworks™ services), , experian (identity theft protection), .

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Tax identification numbers, Phone numbers, Addresses, Business names, Names, Citizenship information, Login credentials, payment card details, personal information, Social Security numbers, Email addresses and Customer Information.

What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?

Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 203.1K.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Organizations need to monitor client-side scripts, include internal ecommerce platforms in security audits, and deploy specialized threat detection for this emerging attack surface. The absence of a security.txt file hindered responsible disclosure and remediation efforts.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Monitor client-side scripts for malicious activity, Deploy specialized threat detection for ecommerce-specific threats, Implement a security.txt file for responsible disclosure and Include employee-facing ecommerce platforms in security audits.

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Cybersecurity researchers and Maine Office of the Attorney General.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is Disclosed (No Further Details).

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued were an Offer of 2-year Experian IdentityWorks™ membership and Identity theft protection services (24 months via Experian) offered to affected individuals.

Initial Access Broker

What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker ?

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was an Employee-facing ecommerce platform.

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Human Error (Merrill Employee Email Misconfiguration), Lack of security audits for employee-facing ecommerce platformsAbsence of security.txt file for responsible disclosureDetection gap for ecommerce-specific threats.

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability was found in Nothings stb up to 1.26. Impacted is the function stbtt_InitFont_internal in the library stb_truetype.h of the component TTF File Handler. Performing a manipulation results in out-of-bounds read. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:N/A:P
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read in VS6ComFile!get_macro_mem_COM. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain a stack-based buffer overflow in VS6ComFile!CSaveData::_conv_AnimationItem. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to arbitrary code execution on the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6MemInIF!set_temp_type_default. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

V-SFT versions 6.2.10.0 and prior contain an out-of-bounds read vulnerability in VS6ComFile!load_link_inf. Opening a crafted V7 file may lead to information disclosure from the affected product.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=bank-of-america-merrill-lynch' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge