Bank Jateng Company Cyber Security Posture
bankjateng.co.idBank Jateng is a company majoring in banking operation. The Bank is located in Central Java and it was established by Provincial and District Governmentthroughout Central Java. The aim of bank establishment was to handle the regional financial as the regional cash holder and to help increasing regional economy by distributing credits to small entrepreneurs. This bank, which stock is owned by both Central Java Provincial Government and all Regional Government, has undergone several business change. In 1969, through the Central Java Provincial Government’s Decree No. 3 year 1969, Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Tengah was stated as Badan Usaha Milik Daerah / BUMD (Regional Owned Enterprise). Later on, through the Regional Rules of Central Java Provincial Government No. 1 year 1993, the status had changed into Perusahaan Daerah or Perusda (Regional Company). After setting out of the recapitalization program, especially to present the company’s positive image. The call name of PT. Bank Pembangunan daerah Jawa Tengah (BPD Jateng) was then changed into Bank Jateng, based on Minister of Justice and Human Rights Decree No. C.17331 HT. 01.04.TH.2005 dated June 22nd, 2005 and Bank’s Statutes Change No. 68 dated May 7th, 2005 by The Notary Prof. DR. Liliana Tedjosaputro.
Bank Jateng Company Details
bank-jateng
10,001+ employees
10509
522
Banking
bankjateng.co.id
Scan still pending
BAN_9184416
In-progress
Bank Jateng Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
Bank Jateng Global Score.png)
Bank Jateng Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
Bank Jateng Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
Bank Jateng Company Subsidiaries
Bank Jateng is a company majoring in banking operation. The Bank is located in Central Java and it was established by Provincial and District Governmentthroughout Central Java. The aim of bank establishment was to handle the regional financial as the regional cash holder and to help increasing regional economy by distributing credits to small entrepreneurs. This bank, which stock is owned by both Central Java Provincial Government and all Regional Government, has undergone several business change. In 1969, through the Central Java Provincial Government’s Decree No. 3 year 1969, Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Tengah was stated as Badan Usaha Milik Daerah / BUMD (Regional Owned Enterprise). Later on, through the Regional Rules of Central Java Provincial Government No. 1 year 1993, the status had changed into Perusahaan Daerah or Perusda (Regional Company). After setting out of the recapitalization program, especially to present the company’s positive image. The call name of PT. Bank Pembangunan daerah Jawa Tengah (BPD Jateng) was then changed into Bank Jateng, based on Minister of Justice and Human Rights Decree No. C.17331 HT. 01.04.TH.2005 dated June 22nd, 2005 and Bank’s Statutes Change No. 68 dated May 7th, 2005 by The Notary Prof. DR. Liliana Tedjosaputro.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
Bank Jateng Cyber Security News
Sustaining Select Efforts to Strengthen the Nation's Cybersecurity and Amending Executive Order 13694 and Executive Order 14144
The People's Republic of China presents the most active and persistent cyber threat to United States Government, private sector, and critical ...
Trump scraps Biden software security, AI, post-quantum encryption efforts in new executive order
The White House accused the Biden administration of trying to “sneak problematic and distracting issues into cybersecurity policy.”
Harris-Walz campaign may have been targeted by iPhone hackers, cybersecurity firm says
High-profile Americans' iPhones may have been targeted in hacking campaign, cybersecurity firm for Harris-Walz says ... Apple strongly disagreed ...
Google scam: Gmail, Google Calendar, Meet invites with phishing links used to deceive and defraud, cybersecurity experts warn
Scammers are using Gmail, Google Calendar and Meet invites with phishing links to deceive and defraud victims, Chicago cybersecurity experts ...
How cybersecurity standout CrowdStrike aims to capitalize on the AI agent gold rush
CrowdStrike CEO George Kurtz sees big business in helping companies safeguard their AI agents.
Cybersecurity Training in Africa Aims to Bolster Professionals' Ranks
Facing significant increases in cybercrime, African organizations have teamed up with international educational institutions to train ...
Kettering Health: Ransomware group believed to be responsible for cybersecurity incident
Kettering Health shared an update on its cybersecurity incident, sharing they identified what they believe is the reason behind the incident ...
Trump revokes digital identity actions in new cyber executive order
President Donald Trump has signed a new cybersecurity executive order that continues many of the policies of his predecessors, ...
CYBERCOM elevates defensive office in ‘net positive’ for cybersecurity mission: Analysts
JFHQ-DODIN will now be known as the sub-unified command Department of Defense Cyber Defense Command.
Bank Jateng Similar Companies
Bank of Baroda
Founded in 1908 by Maharaja Sir Sayaji Rao Gaekwad III, Bank of Baroda is a top notch Public Sector Bank with a business of around Rs.10 trillion and network of 8100+ branches of which 105 overseas branches / offices are located in 17 countries excluding India spanning across Europe, US, Africa, As
Deutsche Bundesbank
Arbeit von besonderem Wert Als Zentralbank der Bundesrepublik Deutschland agieren wir am Puls der internationalen Finanzmärkte und an den Schnittstellen von Politik, Wirtschaft und Wissenschaft. Als hochmoderne Institution, die Digitalisierung und gesellschaftlichen Wandel mitgestaltet, haben wir
Societe Generale
Societe Generale is one of the leading European financial services groups. Based on a diversified and integrated banking model, the Group combines financial strength and proven expertise in innovation with a strategy of sustainable growth. Committed to the positive transformations of the world’s soc
NatWest Group
Our ambition is simple: to succeed with our customers. Because when they succeed, so do we. Whether it’s buying a home, investing for tomorrow, growing a business, or helping our customers to build a more sustainable future, we can succeed with customers by understanding their world and what matte
Emirates NBD
About Emirates NBD Emirates NBD (DFM: Emirates NBD) is a leading banking group in the MENAT (Middle East, North Africa and Türkiye) region with a presence in 13 countries, serving over 20 million customers. As at 30th September 2023, total assets were AED 836 billion, (equivalent to approx. USD 2
Intesa Sanpaolo
Intesa Sanpaolo è il maggior gruppo bancario in Italia con una significativa presenza internazionale. Il suo business model distintivo la rende leader a livello europeo nel Wealth Management, Protection & Advisory e ne caratterizza l’orientamento al digitale. I’impegno in ambito ESG prevede, entro i
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
Bank Jateng CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Bank Jateng has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, Bank Jateng has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Bank Jateng is a company majoring in banking operation. The Bank is located in Central Java and it was established by Provincial and District Governmentthroughout Central Java. The aim of bank establishment was to handle the regional financial as the regional cash holder and to help increasing regional economy by distributing credits to small entrepreneurs. This bank, which stock is owned by both Central Java Provincial Government and all Regional Government, has undergone several business change. In 1969, through the Central Java Provincial Government’s Decree No. 3 year 1969, Bank Pembangunan Daerah Jawa Tengah was stated as Badan Usaha Milik Daerah / BUMD (Regional Owned Enterprise). Later on, through the Regional Rules of Central Java Provincial Government No. 1 year 1993, the status had changed into Perusahaan Daerah or Perusda (Regional Company). After setting out of the recapitalization program, especially to present the company’s positive image. The call name of PT. Bank Pembangunan daerah Jawa Tengah (BPD Jateng) was then changed into Bank Jateng, based on Minister of Justice and Human Rights Decree No. C.17331 HT. 01.04.TH.2005 dated June 22nd, 2005 and Bank’s Statutes Change No. 68 dated May 7th, 2005 by The Notary Prof. DR. Liliana Tedjosaputro..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
