PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk. Company Cyber Security Posture
danamon.co.idPT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (BEI: BDMN) didirikan pada tahun 1956. Per 31 Desember 2024, Danamon mengelola aset konsolidasian sebesar Rp242 triliun dengan anak perusahannya, Adira Finance. Dalam hal kepemilikan saham, 92,47% saham Danamon dimiliki oleh MUFG, dan 7,53% lainnya dimiliki oleh publik. Dalam melayani nasabah dari semua lini bisnis yaitu Retail, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah, serta Korporasi, Danamon didukung oleh 865* kantor cabang konvensional dan unit Syariah, serta kantor cabang dan kantor perwakilan grup perusahaan Danamon di Indonesia. Sebagai anak perusahaan dari MUFG yang merupakan salah satu grup jasa keuangan terbesar di dunia, Danamon didukung oleh jaringan global MUFG dan bank mitranya: Krungsri Bank di Thailand, Security Bank di Filipina, dan VietinBank di Vietnam. Danamon juga diperkuat oleh jaringan lokal dari grup perusahaannya yaitu Adira Finance, Home Credit Indonesia, Mandala Finance, dan Zurich Asuransi Indonesia, serta mitra strategisnya. Bersama MUFG, grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya, Danamon berkomitmen untuk terus bertransformasi sebagai Satu Grup Finansial, guna menjadi mitra keuangan terpercaya yang berorientasi pada pelanggan dan selalu berinovasi, demi memenuhi kebutuhan pemegang saham, nasabah, karyawan, dan regulator dengan menghadirkan solusi finansial menyeluruh agar dapat tumbuh bersama. Danamon dan grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya juga menyadari pentingnya aspek keberlanjutan sebagai bagian tak terpisahkan dari pertumbuhan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Selain itu, dalam menjalankan bisnis serta untuk mencapai tujuan sesuai dengan visi dan misinya, Danamon menjunjung tinggi nilai perusahaan “BISA”, yang harus diterapkan oleh seluruh karyawan, manajemen, direksi, dan komisaris Danamon. Nilai-nilai tersebut meliputi Berkolaborasi, Intergritas, Sigap Melayani, dan Adaptif.
PBDIT Company Details
bank-danamon-indonesia
10247 employees
284062.0
522
Banking
danamon.co.id
Scan still pending
PT _1015236
In-progress
PBDIT Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 800 and 900
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.
PBDIT Global Score.png)
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk. Company Scoring based on AI Models
| Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 800 and 900 |
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk. Company Cyber Security News & History
| Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
|---|
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia, Tbk. Company Subsidiaries
PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (BEI: BDMN) didirikan pada tahun 1956. Per 31 Desember 2024, Danamon mengelola aset konsolidasian sebesar Rp242 triliun dengan anak perusahannya, Adira Finance. Dalam hal kepemilikan saham, 92,47% saham Danamon dimiliki oleh MUFG, dan 7,53% lainnya dimiliki oleh publik. Dalam melayani nasabah dari semua lini bisnis yaitu Retail, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah, serta Korporasi, Danamon didukung oleh 865* kantor cabang konvensional dan unit Syariah, serta kantor cabang dan kantor perwakilan grup perusahaan Danamon di Indonesia. Sebagai anak perusahaan dari MUFG yang merupakan salah satu grup jasa keuangan terbesar di dunia, Danamon didukung oleh jaringan global MUFG dan bank mitranya: Krungsri Bank di Thailand, Security Bank di Filipina, dan VietinBank di Vietnam. Danamon juga diperkuat oleh jaringan lokal dari grup perusahaannya yaitu Adira Finance, Home Credit Indonesia, Mandala Finance, dan Zurich Asuransi Indonesia, serta mitra strategisnya. Bersama MUFG, grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya, Danamon berkomitmen untuk terus bertransformasi sebagai Satu Grup Finansial, guna menjadi mitra keuangan terpercaya yang berorientasi pada pelanggan dan selalu berinovasi, demi memenuhi kebutuhan pemegang saham, nasabah, karyawan, dan regulator dengan menghadirkan solusi finansial menyeluruh agar dapat tumbuh bersama. Danamon dan grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya juga menyadari pentingnya aspek keberlanjutan sebagai bagian tak terpisahkan dari pertumbuhan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Selain itu, dalam menjalankan bisnis serta untuk mencapai tujuan sesuai dengan visi dan misinya, Danamon menjunjung tinggi nilai perusahaan “BISA”, yang harus diterapkan oleh seluruh karyawan, manajemen, direksi, dan komisaris Danamon. Nilai-nilai tersebut meliputi Berkolaborasi, Intergritas, Sigap Melayani, dan Adaptif.
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
Rapid.png)
PBDIT Cyber Security News
Asian Banking & Finance and Insurance Asia Summit - Indonesia - June 26, 2025
Join Asia's top bank and Insurance executives and leading industry experts in enkindling discourse and CEO panel discussions.
PBDIT Similar Companies
Bank of the Philippine Islands (BPI)
Founded in 1851, the Bank of the Philippine Islands is the first bank in the Philippines and in Southeast Asia. Together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, BPI, a universal bank, offers a wide range of financial products and services that serve both retail and corporate clients. Get ready to sta
YES BANK
YES BANK is a leading Indian private sector bank committed to transforming the financial landscape of India. With over 1200 branches nationwide and a dedicated team of YES BANKers, we strive to deliver exceptional banking solutions and empower individuals, businesses and communities to thrive. At Y
Axis Bank
Axis Bank is the third largest private sector bank in India. The Bank offers the entire spectrum of financial services to customer segments covering Large and Mid-Corporates, MSME, Agriculture and Retail Businesses. The Bank has a large footprint of 5000 domestic branches (including extension count
Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. London Branch
Founded in 1908, Bank of Communications Co., Ltd. ("the Bank") is one of the oldest banks in China as well as one of the note-issuing banks in modern China. The Bank was listed on the Hong Kong Stock Exchange in June 2005 and on the Shanghai Stock Exchange in May 2007. The Bank currently has 18
CIMB Niaga
CIMB Niaga was established as Bank Niaga in 1955. CIMB Group holds around 97.9% of the stakes in CIMB Niaga (including PT Commerce Kapital 1.02%). The Bank offers a comprehensive suite of both conventional and Islamic banking products and services, through an expanding delivery channel network of 91
Nordea
We are a universal bank with a 200-year history of supporting and growing the Nordic economies – enabling dreams and aspirations for a greater good. Every day, we work to support our customers’ financial development, delivering best-in-class omnichannel customer experiences and driving sustainable c
Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents
PBDIT CyberSecurity History Information
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, PBDIT has faced 0 incidents in the past.
Incident Types: As of the current reporting period, PBDIT has not encountered any cybersecurity incidents.
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.
Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as PT Bank Danamon Indonesia Tbk (BEI: BDMN) didirikan pada tahun 1956. Per 31 Desember 2024, Danamon mengelola aset konsolidasian sebesar Rp242 triliun dengan anak perusahannya, Adira Finance. Dalam hal kepemilikan saham, 92,47% saham Danamon dimiliki oleh MUFG, dan 7,53% lainnya dimiliki oleh publik. Dalam melayani nasabah dari semua lini bisnis yaitu Retail, Usaha Kecil dan Menengah, serta Korporasi, Danamon didukung oleh 865* kantor cabang konvensional dan unit Syariah, serta kantor cabang dan kantor perwakilan grup perusahaan Danamon di Indonesia. Sebagai anak perusahaan dari MUFG yang merupakan salah satu grup jasa keuangan terbesar di dunia, Danamon didukung oleh jaringan global MUFG dan bank mitranya: Krungsri Bank di Thailand, Security Bank di Filipina, dan VietinBank di Vietnam. Danamon juga diperkuat oleh jaringan lokal dari grup perusahaannya yaitu Adira Finance, Home Credit Indonesia, Mandala Finance, dan Zurich Asuransi Indonesia, serta mitra strategisnya. Bersama MUFG, grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya, Danamon berkomitmen untuk terus bertransformasi sebagai Satu Grup Finansial, guna menjadi mitra keuangan terpercaya yang berorientasi pada pelanggan dan selalu berinovasi, demi memenuhi kebutuhan pemegang saham, nasabah, karyawan, dan regulator dengan menghadirkan solusi finansial menyeluruh agar dapat tumbuh bersama. Danamon dan grup perusahaan serta mitra strategisnya juga menyadari pentingnya aspek keberlanjutan sebagai bagian tak terpisahkan dari pertumbuhan dan kesejahteraan masyarakat. Selain itu, dalam menjalankan bisnis serta untuk mencapai tujuan sesuai dengan visi dan misinya, Danamon menjunjung tinggi nilai perusahaan “BISA”, yang harus diterapkan oleh seluruh karyawan, manajemen, direksi, dan komisaris Danamon. Nilai-nilai tersebut meliputi Berkolaborasi, Intergritas, Sigap Melayani, dan Adaptif..
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.
Incident Details
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Title: {Incident_Title}
Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}
Date Detected: {Detection_Date}
Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}
Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}
Type: {Type_of_Attack}
Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}
Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}
Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}
Motivation: {Motivation}
Common Attack Types: As of now, the company has not encountered any reported incidents involving common cyberattacks.
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.
Impact of the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}
Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}
Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}
Downtime: {Downtime}
Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}
Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}
Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}
Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}
Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}
Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}
Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}
Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entity Name: {Entity_Name}
Entity Type: {Entity_Type}
Industry: {Industry}
Location: {Location}
Size: {Size}
Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}
Response to the Incidents
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}
Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}
Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}
Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}
Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}
Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}
Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}
Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}
On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}
Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}
Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}
Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.
Data Breach Information
Incident 2: Data Breach
Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}
Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}
Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
File Types Exposed: {File_Types}
Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.
Ransomware Information
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}
Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}
Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}
Data Encryption: {Yes/No}
Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}
Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.
Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.
Regulatory Compliance
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}
Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}
Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}
Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}
Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.
Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Recommendations: {Recommendations}
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.
References
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.
Investigation Status
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}
Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.
Initial Access Broker
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Entry Point: {Entry_Point}
Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}
Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}
High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}
Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}
Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Incident 1: Ransomware Attack
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Incident 2: Data Breach
Root Causes: {Root_Causes}
Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.
Additional Questions
General Information
Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.
Incident Details
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.
Impact of the Incidents
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.
Response to the Incidents
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.
Data Breach Information
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.
Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.
Ransomware Information
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.
Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.
Regulatory Compliance
Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.
Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.
References
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.
Investigation Status
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.
Initial Access Broker
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.
Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.
Post-Incident Analysis
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
