Comparison Overview

Avvo

VS

Patent Capital Group

Avvo

720 Olive Way, Seattle, WA, 98101, US
Last Update: 2026-04-03
View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://rb.avvo.com/AvvoLI

Avvo makes it easy for people to research, find, and connect with the right lawyer by providing transparent information, client reviews, and profiles for 97% of practicing lawyers in the United States. A free and anonymous Q&A forum enables consumers to ask a lawyer a question and get a response within 24 hours, and to search more than 10 million existing answers. Topics cover every day legal matters like landlord-tenant questions, traffic accidents, employment issues and more. Avvo was founded in 2006 in Seattle. For more information about how Avvo makes legal easier, visit www.avvo.com.

NAICS: 5411
NAICS Definition: Legal Services
Employees: 182
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
View Profile

Patent Capital Group

None
Last Update: 2026-04-03
Between 750 and 799
http://patcapgroup.com

We are not your traditional IP law firm. Patent Capital Group specializes in providing high quality Patent Prosecution, IP Transactional Work, IP Due Diligence, Portfolio Management, Patent Mining, Trademark Prosecution, and IP Litigation Support. We endeavor to secure our clients'​ Intellectual Property rights to provide them with sustainable competitive advantages in the marketplace. Our big-firm-trained professionals are credentialed, hands-on, and experienced. Perhaps equally important, our predictable cost structure offers significant advantages over typical big firm billing. Current legal trends reveal that sophisticated in-house counsel increasingly choose small high-quality law firms over bigger firms with excessive overhead and inflated billing rates. Patent Capital Group takes great pride in being responsive, personal, and reliable to all of our clients, whether Fortune 500 multi-nationals, small businesses, start-ups, or solo inventors. We work efficiently and provide excellent turnaround times for our clients'​ important projects.

NAICS: 541
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 16
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avvo.jpeg
Avvo
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patent-capital-group.jpeg
Patent Capital Group
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Avvo
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Patent Capital Group
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Avvo in 2026.

Incidents vs Legal Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Patent Capital Group in 2026.

Incident History — Avvo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Avvo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Patent Capital Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Patent Capital Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/avvo.jpeg
Avvo
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2019
Type:Data Leak
Motivation: Extortion
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/patent-capital-group.jpeg
Patent Capital Group
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Patent Capital Group company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Avvo company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Avvo company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Patent Capital Group company has not reported any.

In the current year, Patent Capital Group company and Avvo company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Patent Capital Group company nor Avvo company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Patent Capital Group company nor Avvo company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Patent Capital Group company nor Avvo company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Avvo company nor Patent Capital Group company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Avvo company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Patent Capital Group company.

Avvo company employs more people globally than Patent Capital Group company, reflecting its scale as a Legal Services.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Avvo nor Patent Capital Group holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Hirschmann EagleSDV version 05.4.01 prior to 05.4.02 contains a denial-of-service vulnerability that causes the device to crash during session establishment when using TLS 1.0 or TLS 1.1. Attackers can trigger a crash by initiating TLS connections with these protocol versions to disrupt service availability.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The stored API keys in temporary browser client is not marked as protected allowing for JavScript console or other errors to allow for extraction of the encryption credentials.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

XSS vulnerability in cveInterface.js allows for inject HTML to be passed to display, as cveInterface trusts input from CVE API services

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

Multiple reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the login.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda and red_url parameters.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References
Description

A reflected cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in the login_newpwd.php endpoint of Interzen Consulting S.r.l ZenShare Suite v17.0 allows attackers to execute arbitrary Javascript in the context of the user's browser via a crafted URL injected into the codice_azienda parameter.

Published
Date
2026-04-02
Updated
Date
2026-04-02
References