Avere Systems Company Cyber Security Posture

averesystems.com

Microsoft acquired Avere, a leading provider of high-performance NFS and SMB file-based storage for Linux and Windows clients running in cloud, hybrid and on-premises environments, in January 2018. Avere uses an innovative combination of file system and caching technologies to support the performance requirements for customers who run large-scale compute workloads. By bringing together Avereโ€™s storage expertise with the power of Microsoftโ€™s cloud, customers will benefit from industry-leading innovations that enable the largest, most complex high-performance workloads to run in Microsoft Azure. For more information about the Avere acquistion visit: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/03/microsoft-to-acquire-avere-systems-accelerating-high-performance-computing-innovation-for-media-and-entertainment-industry-and-beyond/โ€

Avere Systems Company Details

Linkedin ID:

avere-systems

Employees number:

10,001+ employees

Number of followers:

4909

NAICS:

511

Industry Type:

Software Development

Homepage:

averesystems.com

IP Addresses:

Scan still pending

Company ID:

AVE_2252958

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreAvere Systems Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 900 and 1000

This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

globalscoreAvere Systems Global Score
blurone
Ailogo

Avere Systems Company Scoring based on AI Models

Model NameDateDescriptionCurrent Score DifferenceScore
AVERAGE-Industry03-12-2025

This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers.

N/A

Between 900 and 1000

Avere Systems Company Cyber Security News & History

Past Incidents
35
Attack Types
5
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenUrl IDDetailsView
MicrosoftBreach100503/2022MIC04123322Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.

GitHubBreach100604/2022GIT102016422Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.

MicrosoftBreach100409/2022MIC01121122Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022.

MicrosoftBreach100509/2023MIC01021023Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: A vulnerability in Microsoft's Exchange email system allowed threat actors with ties to China to steal about 60,000 emails from the US State Department. The accounts of State Department personnel that were compromised were mostly used for diplomatic operations in the Indo-Pacific, and the hackers also obtained a list of all the department's correspondence. Approximately 60,000 unclassified emails were exfiltrated as a result of that breach. No, confidential systems weren't violated. These concerned only the unclassified system. The threat actors employed forged authentication credentials to access user email accounts via Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com, according to Microsoft researchers.

GitHubBreach10057/2024GIT001072724Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHubโ€™s response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.

MicrosoftBreach10058/2024MIC001081724Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations.

MicrosoftBreach50212/2024MIC001010225Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users.

GitHubBreach8542/2025GIT000030225Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.

GitHubBreach6023/2025GIT344032125Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.

GitHubCyber Attack100508/2015GIT105924422Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.

MicrosoftCyber Attack60207/2023MIC20599723Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data.

GitHubCyber Attack10057/2024GIT000072524Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies.

MicrosoftCyber Attack10058/2024MIC001080924Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.

MicrosoftCyber Attack85411/2024MIC001110524Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.

MicrosoftCyber Attack10052/2025MIC000022525Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity.

GitHubCyber Attack8542/2025GIT000030125Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The GitVenom malware campaign primarily targets GitHub users, particularly gamers and crypto investors, by masquerading as open-source projects. These fake repositories contained malicious scripts with the potential to download further nefarious components and execute them. The campaign, active for years with most infection attempts in Russia, Brazil, and Turkey, managed to compromise GitHub accounts, credentials, and crypto data, executing operations such as the theft of cryptocurrency and installing backdoors for remote access. Financial loss is substantial, reaching approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000 at the time of discovery, affecting users' financial assets and GitHub's reputation as a trusted development platform.

MicrosoftData Leak50201/2020MIC234171222Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details.

MicrosoftData Leak25102/2016MIC41021823Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue.

microsoft-aiData Leak60309/2023MIC33924923Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk.

GitHubData Leak25101/2023GIT205981023Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.

MicrosoftData Leak85306/2017MIC2321251123Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.

GitHubData Leak50105/2018GIT432251223Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files.

GitHubRansomware100405/2019GIT02020323Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.

MicrosoftRansomware7523/2025MIC613032125Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack limited on finance or reputation

Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.

Microsoft CloudVulnerability100612/2021MIC134612522Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.

Microsoft CloudVulnerability100505/2022MIC113613522Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization's existence

Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.

MicrosoftVulnerability100606/2022MIC14326622Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the economy of a geographical region

Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants โ€œwizardsโ€ in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised userโ€™s access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence.

MicrosoftVulnerability100503/2021MIC311050724Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attackโ€”exploiting software vulnerabilitiesโ€”the incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.

MicrosoftVulnerability8547/2024MIC000072624Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.

MicrosoftVulnerability85412/2024MIC000121524Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.

MicrosoftVulnerability10053/2025MIC412030525Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

GitHubVulnerability10054/2025GIT350040225Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.

MicrosoftVulnerability6034/2025MIC540040825Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.

MicrosoftVulnerability10055/2025MIC846050725Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organizationโ€™s existence

Description: Microsoftโ€™s Azure Prompt Shield, deployed across its AI services including Azure OpenAI and other enterprise platforms, was revealed to harbor a critical security vulnerability through a deceptively simple emoji smuggling technique. Researchers from Mindgard and Lancaster University demonstrated that by embedding malicious instructions within Unicode emoji variation selectors, attackers can bypass the shieldโ€™s content inspection pipeline entirely. Because Azure Prompt Shield fails to normalize or parse these hidden characters in line with the underlying language model, it remains blind to the hidden payload while the model itself executes the commands. In controlled tests, this bypass achieved a perfect 100% success rate, enabling adversaries to unleash unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration attempts, and disallowed content generation. The implications are profound: enterprises relying on Azureโ€™s guardrails may unknowingly expose sensitive intellectual property, customer data, and internal decision-making processes to hostile actors. This flaw not only undermines user trust in Microsoftโ€™s AI safety infrastructure but also highlights an urgent need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment.

MicrosoftVulnerability2515/2025MIC632052625Link
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack without any consequences

Description: A vulnerability known as BadSuccessor in Windows Server 2025โ€™s delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature has been weaponized by a proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor. This tool allows attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions to escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious security concerns for enterprise environments worldwide. The vulnerability leverages the dMSA migration mechanism and requires only CreateChild permissions over any Organizational Unit (OU) to function. Exploiting this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and potential data breaches within organizations.

Avere Systems Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Microsoft acquired Avere, a leading provider of high-performance NFS and SMB file-based storage for Linux and Windows clients running in cloud, hybrid and on-premises environments, in January 2018. Avere uses an innovative combination of file system and caching technologies to support the performance requirements for customers who run large-scale compute workloads. By bringing together Avereโ€™s storage expertise with the power of Microsoftโ€™s cloud, customers will benefit from industry-leading innovations that enable the largest, most complex high-performance workloads to run in Microsoft Azure. For more information about the Avere acquistion visit: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/03/microsoft-to-acquire-avere-systems-accelerating-high-performance-computing-innovation-for-media-and-entertainment-industry-and-beyond/โ€

Loading...

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=avere-systems' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
newsone

Avere Systems Cyber Security News

2024-07-23T07:00:00.000Z
Permissive Avere Contributor Role Allows Virtual Machine Credential Dumping

Secureworksยฎ Counter Threat Unitโ„ข (CTU) researchers identified an opportunity for malicious privilege escalation within Microsoft Azure.

2025-05-09T07:00:00.000Z
Best Password Manager for May 2025

There are many password managers on the market but NordPass, 1Password, and Keeper are consistently among the best password manager lists. They'ย ...

2024-10-30T07:00:00.000Z
Sweden and Norway rethink cashless society plans over Russia security fears

Sweden and Norway rethink cashless society plans over Russia security fears. Rise in hybrid warfare and cyber-attacks blamed on pro-Russia groups.

2022-06-15T07:00:00.000Z
Missing Key: The challenge of cybersecurity and central bank digital currency

New research on the cybersecurity challenges posed by digital currencies and design models that can provide a more secure financial system.

2021-07-02T07:00:00.000Z
Smart Home Experiences Over 12,000 Cyber-Attacks in a Week

A Which? analysis found that that a home filled with smart devices was targeted by over 12000 unique scans/hacks in a single week.

2019-10-14T07:00:00.000Z
A glimpse into the present state of security in robotics

Overall, ROS has no built-in security; it lacks authentication, authorization and confidentiality features.

2021-11-11T08:00:00.000Z
When the alarms go off: 10 key steps to take after a data breach

When the alarms go off: 10 key steps to take after a data breach ยท Stay calm ยท Follow your incident response plan ยท Assess the scope of theย ...

2024-03-20T07:00:00.000Z
Network Attached Storage (NAS) Market Growing Trends and Demands Analysis Forecast 2024 to 2030

NAS systems offer centralized data storage, file sharing, and backup capabilities, catering to the needs of individuals, small businesses, andย ...

2015-03-20T07:00:00.000Z
The Company Securing Your Internet Has Close Ties to Russian Spies

The bottom line: Popular security-software maker Kaspersky Lab has close ties to Russian military and intelligence officials. (Updated firstย ...

similarCompanies

Avere Systems Similar Companies

Asseco Poland

Asseco Poland is the largest software producer listed on the Warsaw Stock Exchange. It has developed technologically advanced software solutions for all key sectors of the economy for over 30 years. Today, Asseco Poland stands at the forefront of the multinational Asseco Group. We are the number o

Tencent

Tencent is a world-leading internet and technology company that develops innovative products and services to improve the quality of life of people around the world. Founded in 1998 with its headquarters in Shenzhen, China, Tencent's guiding principle is to use technology for good. Our communication

Google

A problem isn't truly solved until it's solved for all. Googlers build products that help create opportunities for everyone, whether down the street or across the globe. Bring your insight, imagination and a healthy disregard for the impossible. Bring everything that makes you unique. Together, we c

bigbasket

Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is Indiaโ€™s largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of business lines - bigbasket, bb

Join us in our mission to help the world get well, help the world stay well, and help future generations be healthier. We hire smart and motivated people from all academic majors to code, test, and implement healthcare software that hundreds of millions of patients and doctors rely on to improve ca

Pitney Bowes

Pitney Bowes (NYSE: PBI) is a technology-driven company that provides SaaS shipping solutions, mailing innovation, and financial services to clients around the world โ€“ including more than 90 percent of the Fortune 500. Small businesses to large enterprises, and government entities rely on Pitney Bow

faq

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) on Cybersecurity Incidents

Avere Systems CyberSecurity History Information

Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Avere Systems has faced 35 incidents in the past.

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include ['Vulnerability', 'Cyber Attack', 'Ransomware', 'Breach', 'Data Leak'].

Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be {total_financial_loss}.

Cybersecurity Posture: The company's overall cybersecurity posture is described as Microsoft acquired Avere, a leading provider of high-performance NFS and SMB file-based storage for Linux and Windows clients running in cloud, hybrid and on-premises environments, in January 2018. Avere uses an innovative combination of file system and caching technologies to support the performance requirements for customers who run large-scale compute workloads. By bringing together Avereโ€™s storage expertise with the power of Microsoftโ€™s cloud, customers will benefit from industry-leading innovations that enable the largest, most complex high-performance workloads to run in Microsoft Azure. For more information about the Avere acquistion visit: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/03/microsoft-to-acquire-avere-systems-accelerating-high-performance-computing-innovation-for-media-and-entertainment-industry-and-beyond/โ€.

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through {description_of_detection_and_response_process}.

Incident Details

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Title: {Incident_Title}

Description: {Brief_description_of_the_incident}

Date Detected: {Detection_Date}

Date Publicly Disclosed: {Disclosure_Date}

Date Resolved: {Resolution_Date}

Type: {Type_of_Attack}

Attack Vector: {Attack_Vector}

Vulnerability Exploited: {Vulnerability}

Threat Actor: {Threat_Actor}

Motivation: {Motivation}

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced are ['Breach', 'Cyber Attack', 'Data Leak', 'Ransomware', 'Vulnerability'].

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through {description_of_identification_process}.

Impact of the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Financial Loss: {Financial_Loss}

Data Compromised: {Data_Compromised}

Systems Affected: {Systems_Affected}

Downtime: {Downtime}

Operational Impact: {Operational_Impact}

Conversion Rate Impact: {Conversion_Rate_Impact}

Revenue Loss: {Revenue_Loss}

Customer Complaints: {Customer_Complaints}

Brand Reputation Impact: {Brand_Reputation_Impact}

Legal Liabilities: {Legal_Liabilities}

Identity Theft Risk: {Identity_Theft_Risk}

Payment Information Risk: {Payment_Information_Risk}

Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is {average_financial_loss}.

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are {list_of_commonly_compromised_data_types}.

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entity Name: {Entity_Name}

Entity Type: {Entity_Type}

Industry: {Industry}

Location: {Location}

Size: {Size}

Customers Affected: {Customers_Affected}

Response to the Incidents

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Incident Response Plan Activated: {Yes/No}

Third Party Assistance: {Yes/No}

Law Enforcement Notified: {Yes/No}

Containment Measures: {Containment_Measures}

Remediation Measures: {Remediation_Measures}

Recovery Measures: {Recovery_Measures}

Communication Strategy: {Communication_Strategy}

Adaptive Behavioral WAF: {Adaptive_Behavioral_WAF}

On-Demand Scrubbing Services: {On_Demand_Scrubbing_Services}

Network Segmentation: {Network_Segmentation}

Enhanced Monitoring: {Enhanced_Monitoring}

Incident Response Plan: The company's incident response plan is described as {description_of_incident_response_plan}.

Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through {description_of_third_party_involvement}.

Data Breach Information

Incident 2: Data Breach

Type of Data Compromised: {Type_of_Data}

Number of Records Exposed: {Number_of_Records}

Sensitivity of Data: {Sensitivity_of_Data}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

File Types Exposed: {File_Types}

Personally Identifiable Information: {Yes/No}

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: {description_of_prevention_measures}.

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through {description_of_handling_process}.

Ransomware Information

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Ransom Demanded: {Ransom_Amount}

Ransom Paid: {Ransom_Paid}

Ransomware Strain: {Ransomware_Strain}

Data Encryption: {Yes/No}

Data Exfiltration: {Yes/No}

Ransom Payment Policy: The company's policy on paying ransoms in ransomware incidents is described as {description_of_ransom_payment_policy}.

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through {description_of_data_recovery_process}.

Regulatory Compliance

Ransomware Logo

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Data Breach Logo

Incident 2: Data Breach

Regulations Violated: {Regulations_Violated}

Fines Imposed: {Fines_Imposed}

Legal Actions: {Legal_Actions}

Regulatory Notifications: {Regulatory_Notifications}

Regulatory Frameworks: The company complies with the following regulatory frameworks regarding cybersecurity: {list_of_regulatory_frameworks}.

Ensuring Regulatory Compliance: The company ensures compliance with regulatory requirements through {description_of_compliance_measures}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Lessons Learned: {Lessons_Learned}

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Recommendations: {Recommendations}

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are {list_of_key_lessons_learned}.

Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: {list_of_implemented_recommendations}.

References

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Source: {Source}

URL: {URL}

Date Accessed: {Date_Accessed}

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at {list_of_additional_resources}.

Investigation Status

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Investigation Status: {Investigation_Status}

Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through {description_of_communication_process}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}


Incident 2: Data Breach

Stakeholder Advisories: {Stakeholder_Advisories}

Customer Advisories: {Customer_Advisories}

Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: {description_of_advisories_provided}.

Initial Access Broker

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Entry Point: {Entry_Point}

Reconnaissance Period: {Reconnaissance_Period}

Backdoors Established: {Backdoors_Established}

High Value Targets: {High_Value_Targets}

Data Sold on Dark Web: {Yes/No}

Monitoring and Mitigation of Initial Access Brokers: The company monitors and mitigates the activities of initial access brokers through {description_of_monitoring_and_mitigation_measures}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Incident 1: Ransomware Attack

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Incident 2: Data Breach

Root Causes: {Root_Causes}

Corrective Actions: {Corrective_Actions}

Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as {description_of_post_incident_analysis_process}.

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: {list_of_corrective_actions_taken}.

Additional Questions

General Information

Ransom Payment History: The company has {paid/not_paid} ransoms in the past.

Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was {last_ransom_amount}.

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was {last_attacking_group}.

Incident Details

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on {most_recent_incident_detected_date}.

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on {most_recent_incident_publicly_disclosed_date}.

Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on {most_recent_incident_resolved_date}.

Impact of the Incidents

Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was {highest_financial_loss}.

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident was {most_significant_data_compromised}.

Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident was {most_significant_system_affected}.

Response to the Incidents

Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was {third_party_assistance_in_most_recent_incident}.

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were {containment_measures_in_most_recent_incident}.

Data Breach Information

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach was {most_sensitive_data_compromised}.

Number of Records Exposed: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was {number_of_records_exposed}.

Ransomware Information

Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_demanded}.

Highest Ransom Paid: The highest ransom paid in a ransomware incident was {highest_ransom_paid}.

Regulatory Compliance

Highest Fine Imposed: The highest fine imposed for a regulatory violation was {highest_fine_imposed}.

Most Significant Legal Action: The most significant legal action taken for a regulatory violation was {most_significant_legal_action}.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was {most_significant_lesson_learned}.

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was {most_significant_recommendation_implemented}.

References

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident is {most_recent_source}.

Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is {most_recent_url}.

Investigation Status

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is {current_status_of_most_recent_investigation}.

Stakeholder and Customer Advisories

Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was {most_recent_stakeholder_advisory}.

Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was {most_recent_customer_advisory}.

Initial Access Broker

Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker was {most_recent_entry_point}.

Most Recent Reconnaissance Period: The most recent reconnaissance period for an incident was {most_recent_reconnaissance_period}.

Post-Incident Analysis

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was {most_significant_root_cause}.

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was {most_significant_corrective_action}.

What Do We Measure?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge