
Avere Systems Company Cyber Security Posture
averesystems.comMicrosoft acquired Avere, a leading provider of high-performance NFS and SMB file-based storage for Linux and Windows clients running in cloud, hybrid and on-premises environments, in January 2018. Avere uses an innovative combination of file system and caching technologies to support the performance requirements for customers who run large-scale compute workloads. By bringing together Avereโs storage expertise with the power of Microsoftโs cloud, customers will benefit from industry-leading innovations that enable the largest, most complex high-performance workloads to run in Microsoft Azure. For more information about the Avere acquistion visit: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/03/microsoft-to-acquire-avere-systems-accelerating-high-performance-computing-innovation-for-media-and-entertainment-industry-and-beyond/โ
Avere Systems Company Details
avere-systems
10,001+ employees
4909
511
Software Development
averesystems.com
Scan still pending
AVE_2252958
In-progress

Between 900 and 1000
This score is AI-generated and less favored by cyber insurers, who prefer the TPRM score.

.png)

Avere Systems Company Scoring based on AI Models
Model Name | Date | Description | Current Score Difference | Score |
---|---|---|---|---|
AVERAGE-Industry | 03-12-2025 | This score represents the average cybersecurity rating of companies already scanned within the same industry. It provides a benchmark to compare an individual company's security posture against its industry peers. | N/A | Between 900 and 1000 |
Avere Systems Company Cyber Security News & History
Entity | Type | Severity | Impact | Seen | Url ID | Details | View |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 03/2022 | MIC04123322 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 100 | 6 | 04/2022 | GIT102016422 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 08/2015 | GIT105924422 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to Github. Github investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers. | |||||||
Microsoft Cloud | Vulnerability | 100 | 6 | 12/2021 | MIC134612522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021. | |||||||
Microsoft Cloud | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 05/2022 | MIC113613522 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organization's existenceDescription: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to Any malicious actor could have weaponized the bug to acquire the Azure Data Factory service certificate and access another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. However, no evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 6 | 06/2022 | MIC14326622 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the economy of a geographical regionDescription: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants โwizardsโ in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised userโs access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer. Microsoft has yet not issued a patch but has suggested disabling the MSDT URL Protocol to cut off the attack sequence. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 4 | 09/2022 | MIC01121122 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Some of the sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner. However, the leak was caused by the "unintentional misconfiguration on an endpoint that is not in use across the Microsoft ecosystem" but the SOCRadar claimed to link this sensitive information to more than 65,000 entities from 111 countries stored in files dated from 2017 to August 2022. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 50 | 2 | 01/2020 | MIC234171222 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft experienced massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses and support case details. | |||||||
GitHub | Ransomware | 100 | 4 | 05/2019 | GIT02020323 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which include at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that Hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 60 | 2 | 07/2023 | MIC20599723 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks that targeted the business's services were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359). In a report titled Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, the IT giant later acknowledged it had been the target of DDoS assaults. Still, he did not disclose further information regarding the outage. The business emphasized that they had not found proof of unauthorized access to or compromise of client data. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 25 | 1 | 02/2016 | MIC41021823 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: The database that drives m.careersatmicrosoft.com was handled by a mobile web development company that Microsoft relied on, and it was accessible without any authentication for a few weeks. All signs pointed to the database, which was a MongoDB instance, not being write-protected. Therefore, an attacker may have altered the database and, as a result, the HTML code of the job listing pages throughout the disclosed time period. Everything was secured once Chris Vickery informed Punchkick and Microsoft of the issue. | |||||||
microsoft-ai | Data Leak | 60 | 3 | 09/2023 | MIC33924923 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub, according to cybersecurity company Wiz. Secrets, private keys, passwords, and more than 30,000 internal Microsoft Teams communications were discovered in a disk backup of the workstations of two workers that was made public by the disclosed data. Wiz emphasized that because Microsoft does not offer a centralized method to manage SAS tokens within the Azure interface, it is difficult to track them. Microsoft claimed that the data lead did not reveal customer data, that no customer data was leaked, and that this vulnerability did not put any internal services at risk. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 09/2023 | MIC01021023 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A vulnerability in Microsoft's Exchange email system allowed threat actors with ties to China to steal about 60,000 emails from the US State Department. The accounts of State Department personnel that were compromised were mostly used for diplomatic operations in the Indo-Pacific, and the hackers also obtained a list of all the department's correspondence. Approximately 60,000 unclassified emails were exfiltrated as a result of that breach. No, confidential systems weren't violated. These concerned only the unclassified system. The threat actors employed forged authentication credentials to access user email accounts via Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com, according to Microsoft researchers. | |||||||
GitHub | Data Leak | 25 | 1 | 01/2023 | GIT205981023 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise. | |||||||
Microsoft | Data Leak | 85 | 3 | 06/2017 | MIC2321251123 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump. | |||||||
GitHub | Data Leak | 50 | 1 | 05/2018 | GIT432251223 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: GitHub, the top software development platform in the world, made some users reset their passwords after discovering an issue that resulted in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs. A routine corporate audit uncovered the problem, which involved some users sharing on Twitter the email correspondence that the organisation had received. The business promptly stated that user data was safe and that none of its systems had been compromised. The business further stated that the plaintext passwords were not publicly available and could only be seen by a limited number of its IT workers through internal log files. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 03/2021 | MIC311050724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attackโexploiting software vulnerabilitiesโthe incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 7/2024 | GIT000072524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 7/2024 | MIC000072624 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 100 | 5 | 7/2024 | GIT001072724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHubโs response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 8/2024 | MIC001080924 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 100 | 5 | 8/2024 | MIC001081724 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 11/2024 | MIC001110524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 12/2024 | MIC000121524 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy. | |||||||
Microsoft | Breach | 50 | 2 | 12/2024 | MIC001010225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 100 | 5 | 2/2025 | MIC000022525 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A large botnet, composed of over 130,000 devices and attributed to a Chinese-affiliated hacking group, has been targeting Microsoft 365 (M365) accounts through password spraying attacks. By exploiting the use of basic authentication, the botnet bypassed multi-factor authentication (MFA), leveraging stolen credentials. The breach has been ongoing since at least December 2024 and poses significant risks as it operates undetected by exploiting Non-Interactive Sign-In logs. Security teams usually overlook these logs, which conceal the high-volume password spraying attempts. These attacks have had widespread global impacts across numerous M365 tenants, leading to potential compromises in user account security and organizational data integrity. | |||||||
GitHub | Cyber Attack | 85 | 4 | 2/2025 | GIT000030125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The GitVenom malware campaign primarily targets GitHub users, particularly gamers and crypto investors, by masquerading as open-source projects. These fake repositories contained malicious scripts with the potential to download further nefarious components and execute them. The campaign, active for years with most infection attempts in Russia, Brazil, and Turkey, managed to compromise GitHub accounts, credentials, and crypto data, executing operations such as the theft of cryptocurrency and installing backdoors for remote access. Financial loss is substantial, reaching approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000 at the time of discovery, affecting users' financial assets and GitHub's reputation as a trusted development platform. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 85 | 4 | 2/2025 | GIT000030225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 3/2025 | MIC412030525 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security. | |||||||
Microsoft | Ransomware | 75 | 2 | 3/2025 | MIC613032125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches. | |||||||
GitHub | Breach | 60 | 2 | 3/2025 | GIT344032125 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future. | |||||||
GitHub | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 4/2025 | GIT350040225 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 60 | 3 | 4/2025 | MIC540040825 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 5 | 5/2025 | MIC846050725 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoftโs Azure Prompt Shield, deployed across its AI services including Azure OpenAI and other enterprise platforms, was revealed to harbor a critical security vulnerability through a deceptively simple emoji smuggling technique. Researchers from Mindgard and Lancaster University demonstrated that by embedding malicious instructions within Unicode emoji variation selectors, attackers can bypass the shieldโs content inspection pipeline entirely. Because Azure Prompt Shield fails to normalize or parse these hidden characters in line with the underlying language model, it remains blind to the hidden payload while the model itself executes the commands. In controlled tests, this bypass achieved a perfect 100% success rate, enabling adversaries to unleash unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration attempts, and disallowed content generation. The implications are profound: enterprises relying on Azureโs guardrails may unknowingly expose sensitive intellectual property, customer data, and internal decision-making processes to hostile actors. This flaw not only undermines user trust in Microsoftโs AI safety infrastructure but also highlights an urgent need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 25 | 1 | 5/2025 | MIC632052625 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequencesDescription: A vulnerability known as BadSuccessor in Windows Server 2025โs delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature has been weaponized by a proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor. This tool allows attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions to escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious security concerns for enterprise environments worldwide. The vulnerability leverages the dMSA migration mechanism and requires only CreateChild permissions over any Organizational Unit (OU) to function. Exploiting this vulnerability could lead to unauthorized access and potential data breaches within organizations. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 6/2025 | MIC902061025 | Link | ||
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's June 2025 Patch Tuesday addressed 66 vulnerabilities, including two zero-day flaws. One actively exploited flaw, CVE-2025-33053, allowed remote code execution in Web Distributed Authoring and Versioning (WEBDAV). Another publicly disclosed flaw, CVE-2025-33073, enabled elevation of privileges in Windows SMB. These vulnerabilities could have significant implications if exploited, potentially leading to data breaches, system compromises, and financial losses. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 85 | 4 | 7/2025 | MIC927070325 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with customers data leaksDescription: Microsoft has released a critical security update for Edge Stable Channel on July 1, 2025, addressing a severe vulnerability (CVE-2025-6554) that cybercriminals have actively exploited. The vulnerability affects the underlying Chromium engine that powers Microsoft Edge, potentially allowing attackers to execute arbitrary code or gain unauthorized access to sensitive user data. This highlights the urgency of applying the security update immediately to protect against sophisticated attacks that could compromise personal information, corporate data, or system integrity. | |||||||
Microsoft | Vulnerability | 100 | 7/2025 | MIC607071425 | Link | ||
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack threatening the organizationโs existenceDescription: Microsoft's Windows Explorer is affected by RenderShock, a zero-click attack that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors. This vulnerability allows attackers to execute malicious payloads without user interaction, potentially leading to credential theft, remote access, and data leaks. The attack methodology leverages built-in system automation features, making it difficult to detect and mitigate. Security teams are advised to disable preview panes and block SMB traffic to prevent such attacks. | |||||||
GitHub | Vulnerability | 50 | 2 | 7/2025 | GIT817071625 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack limited on finance or reputationDescription: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, allowing attackers to achieve remote code execution through maliciously crafted repositories when users execute git clone โrecursive commands. This vulnerability, assigned a CVSS severity score of 8.1/10, exploits a flaw in Git's handling of configuration values and carriage return characters. Public proof-of-concept exploits are available, and urgent remediation is required across development environments. | |||||||
Microsoft | Cyber Attack | 25 | 7/2025 | MIC709072225 | Link | ||
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack without any consequences: Attack in which data is not compromisedDescription: A hack targeting Microsoft's SharePoint software was likely carried out by a single bad actor, according to researchers. This incident highlights the vulnerabilities in widely used enterprise software and the potential for significant disruption to businesses relying on such platforms. The attack did not compromise data, but it underscores the need for robust cybersecurity measures to protect against similar threats in the future. | |||||||
Microsoft Corp. | Vulnerability | 85 | 3 | 7/2025 | MIC529072325 | Link | |
Rankiteo Explanation : Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaksDescription: The number of companies and organizations compromised by a security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.โs SharePoint servers is increasing rapidly, with the tally of victims soaring more than six-fold in a few days, according to one research firm. Hackers have breached about 400 government agencies, corporations, and other groups, with most victims in the US, followed by Mauritius, Jordan, South Africa, and the Netherlands. The hacks are among the latest major breaches that Microsoft has blamed, at least in part, on China. |
Avere Systems Company Subsidiaries

Microsoft acquired Avere, a leading provider of high-performance NFS and SMB file-based storage for Linux and Windows clients running in cloud, hybrid and on-premises environments, in January 2018. Avere uses an innovative combination of file system and caching technologies to support the performance requirements for customers who run large-scale compute workloads. By bringing together Avereโs storage expertise with the power of Microsoftโs cloud, customers will benefit from industry-leading innovations that enable the largest, most complex high-performance workloads to run in Microsoft Azure. For more information about the Avere acquistion visit: https://blogs.microsoft.com/blog/2018/01/03/microsoft-to-acquire-avere-systems-accelerating-high-performance-computing-innovation-for-media-and-entertainment-industry-and-beyond/โ
Access Data Using Our API

Get company history
.png)
Avere Systems Cyber Security News
Missing Key: The challenge of cybersecurity and central bank digital currency
A government-issued digital currency system could, but does not necessarily need to, collect, centralize, and store massive amounts ofย ...

Avere Systems Similar Companies

Lazada
About Lazada Group Founded in 2012, Lazada Group is the leading eCommerce platform in Southeast Asia. We are accelerating progress in Indonesia, Malaysia, the Philippines, Singapore, Thailand and Vietnam through commerce and technology. With the largest logistics and payments networks in the regio

GlobalLogic
GlobalLogic, a Hitachi Group Company, is a full-lifecycle product development services leader that combines chip-to-cloud software engineering expertise and vertical industry experience to help our customers design, build, and deliver their next generation products and digital experiences. We expert

Upwork
Upwork is the worldโs work marketplace that connects businesses with independent talent from across the globe. We serve everyone from one-person startups to large, Fortune 100 enterprises with a powerful, trust-driven platform that enables companies and talent to work together in new ways that unloc

bigbasket
Starting our journey in 2011, today, bigbasket - a Tata Enterprise is Indiaโs largest online supermarket with over 13 million customers and a presence in 60+ cities & towns. With our presence spanning the entire spectrum of consumer needs, we operate through a range of business lines - bigbasket, bb

Microsoft
Every company has a mission. What's ours? To empower every person and every organization to achieve more. We believe technology can and should be a force for good and that meaningful innovation contributes to a brighter world in the future and today. Our culture doesnโt just encourage curiosity; it

[24]7.ai
[24]7.aiโข customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent productivity and satisfaction; a

Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
Avere Systems CyberSecurity History Information
How many cyber incidents has Avere Systems faced?
Total Incidents: According to Rankiteo, Avere Systems has faced 41 incidents in the past.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Avere Systems?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred incidents Ransomware, Cyber Attack, Data Leak, Breach and Vulnerability.
What was the total financial impact of these incidents on Avere Systems?
Total Financial Loss: The total financial loss from these incidents is estimated to be $5.
How does Avere Systems detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through remediation measures with Patches Issued by Microsoft and containment measures with Upgrade to patched Git versions, Avoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched and remediation measures with Upgrade to patched Git versions, Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions and enhanced monitoring with Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions and containment measures with Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking and remediation measures with Deploy Behavioral Monitoring and enhanced monitoring with Monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd and remediation measures with Patching and communication strategy with Public Disclosure, User Notifications and remediation measures with Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only and remediation measures with Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team and remediation measures with Implement stricter file and folder access controls and remediation measures with Patch deployed and containment measures with Disabled Ghost Accounts and remediation measures with Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content and remediation measures with Patch released and containment measures with Disable fake accounts and remediation measures with Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture and containment measures with Password Reset and communication strategy with Public Statement and third party assistance with Wiz and third party assistance with Chris Vickery and containment measures with Secured the database and containment measures with Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol and remediation measures with Mitigated the security flaw and remediation measures with Patch released in December 2021 and containment measures with Removed Several Repositories and containment measures with Notifying impacted users and organizations and communication strategy with Notifying impacted users and organizations.
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident?

Incident : Cyber Attack
Title: Microsoft SharePoint Server Vulnerability Exploitation
Description: A security vulnerability in Microsoft Corp.โs SharePoint servers has been exploited by hackers, compromising about 400 government agencies, corporations, and other groups. The vulnerability allows hackers to access SharePoint servers and steal keys to impersonate users or services, enabling deep access into compromised networks to steal confidential data.
Type: Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Exploitation
Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft SharePoint Server
Threat Actor: Linen Typhoon, Violet Typhoon, Storm-2603
Motivation: Espionage, Intellectual Property Theft

Incident : Server Hack
Title: Microsoft SharePoint Server Hack
Description: A hack targeting Microsoft's SharePoint software was likely carried out by a single bad actor, researchers say.
Type: Server Hack
Attack Vector: Exploitation of SharePoint Software
Threat Actor: Single Bad Actor

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation
Title: Git CLI Arbitrary File Write Vulnerability
Description: A critical vulnerability in Git CLI enables arbitrary file writes on Linux and macOS systems, with working proof-of-concept exploits now publicly available.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Malicious repositories via git clone โrecursive commands
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-48384
Motivation: Remote Code Execution, Data Exfiltration

Incident : Zero-Click Attack
Title: RenderShock Zero-Click Attack
Description: A sophisticated zero-click attack methodology called RenderShock that exploits passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems to execute malicious payloads without requiring any user interaction.
Type: Zero-Click Attack
Attack Vector: File Preview Systems, Automatic File Indexing Services
Vulnerability Exploited: RenderShock 0-Click Vulnerability
Motivation: Credential Harvesting, Remote Access, Data Exfiltration

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability
Title: Microsoft Edge Security Update for CVE-2025-6554 and CVE-2025-49713
Description: Microsoft has released a critical security update for Edge Stable Channel on July 1, 2025, addressing a severe vulnerability that cybercriminals have actively exploited.
Date Detected: 2025-07-01
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-01
Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploited in the wild
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-6554, CVE-2025-49713
Threat Actor: Unknown
Motivation: Data Theft, System Compromise, Arbitrary Code Execution

Incident : Vulnerability Patch
Title: Microsoft June 2025 Patch Tuesday
Description: Microsoft's June 2025 Patch Tuesday includes security updates for 66 flaws, including one actively exploited vulnerability and another that was publicly disclosed.
Date Publicly Disclosed: June 2025
Type: Vulnerability Patch
Attack Vector: Remote Code Execution, Elevation of Privilege, Security Feature Bypass, Information Disclosure, Denial of Service, Spoofing
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-33053, CVE-2025-33073

Incident : Privilege Escalation
Title: BadSuccessor Vulnerability Exploited by SharpSuccessor Tool
Description: A proof-of-concept exploit tool called SharpSuccessor that weaponizes the recently discovered BadSuccessor vulnerability in Windows Server 2025โs delegated Managed Service Account (dMSA) feature. The .NET-based tool, developed by Logan Goins, demonstrates how attackers with minimal Active Directory permissions can escalate privileges to the domain administrator level, raising serious concerns about the unpatched vulnerability affecting enterprise environments worldwide.
Type: Privilege Escalation
Attack Vector: Exploiting dMSA migration mechanism by manipulating msDS-ManagedAccountPrecededByLink and msDS-DelegatedMSAState attributes
Vulnerability Exploited: BadSuccessor
Motivation: Privilege Escalation

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation
Title: Azure Prompt Shield Vulnerability
Description: Microsoftโs Azure Prompt Shield, deployed across its AI services including Azure OpenAI and other enterprise platforms, was revealed to harbor a critical security vulnerability through a deceptively simple emoji smuggling technique. Researchers from Mindgard and Lancaster University demonstrated that by embedding malicious instructions within Unicode emoji variation selectors, attackers can bypass the shieldโs content inspection pipeline entirely. Because Azure Prompt Shield fails to normalize or parse these hidden characters in line with the underlying language model, it remains blind to the hidden payload while the model itself executes the commands. In controlled tests, this bypass achieved a perfect 100% success rate, enabling adversaries to unleash unauthorized code execution, data exfiltration attempts, and disallowed content generation. The implications are profound: enterprises relying on Azureโs guardrails may unknowingly expose sensitive intellectual property, customer data, and internal decision-making processes to hostile actors. This flaw not only undermines user trust in Microsoftโs AI safety infrastructure but also highlights an urgent need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment.
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Emoji Smuggling
Vulnerability Exploited: Unicode emoji variation selectors
Motivation: Unauthorized code execution, Data exfiltration, Disallowed content generation

Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure
Title: Microsoft Security Vulnerabilities Discovered by EncryptHub
Description: Microsoft encountered a security challenge when EncryptHub, also known as SkorikARI, a threat actor emerged with skills in vulnerability research. The actor, credited by Microsoft for uncovering two Windows security issues, could potentially compromise users' safety and data. The vulnerabilities, identified as high-severity CVE-2025-24061 and medium-severity CVE-2025-24071, raised concerns over the Mark of the Web security feature and Windows File Explorer, respectively. EncryptHub's background in ransomware and vishing, combined with these recent activities, signifies a mixed threat profile. Although policies and user vigilance can mitigate risks, the presence of these vulnerabilities unveiled by EncryptHub poses a direct threat to Microsoft's systems and its vast user base.
Type: Vulnerability Disclosure
Attack Vector: Vulnerability Research, Ransomware, Vishing
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2025-24061, CVE-2025-24071
Threat Actor: EncryptHub (SkorikARI)

Incident : Vulnerability
Title: GitHub CodeQL Vulnerability
Description: A vulnerability within GitHub's CodeQL, a security analysis tool, was uncovered that had the potential to be exploited, potentially affecting a vast number of public and private repositories. Despite there being no evidence of actual misuse, the flaw could have allowed for the exfiltration of source code and secrets, jeopardizing the security of internal networks including GitHub's own systems. The vulnerability, which involved the exposure of a GitHub token, was quickly addressed by the GitHub team, showcasing their rapid and impressive response.
Type: Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploit of a security analysis tool
Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of GitHub token

Incident : Data Breach
Title: GitHub Repositories Compromised
Description: GitHub repositories were compromised, leading to the exposure of install action tokens which fortunately had a limited 24-hour lifespan, thus reducing the risk of widespread exploitation. Endor Labs found that other sensitive credentials like those for Docker, npm, and AWS were also leaked, although many repositories adhered to security best practices by referencing commit SHA values rather than mutable tags, mitigating the potential damage. Despite the reduced impact, due to the potential for threat actors to leverage GitHub Actions, users are advised to implement stricter file and folder access controls to enhance security measures and prevent similar incidents in the future.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials
Vulnerability Exploited: Exposure of Install Action Tokens

Incident : Ransomware
Title: VSCode Marketplace Ransomware Incident
Description: The VSCode Marketplace, operated by Microsoft, suffered a security lapse when two extensions embedding in-development ransomware bypassed the review process. These extensions, downloaded by a handful of users, aimed to encrypt files within a specific test folder and demanded a ransom in ShibaCoin. While the impact was minimal due to the ransomware's limited scope, it revealed significant gaps in Microsoft's review system. This incident sheds light on potential vulnerabilities within widely used developer platforms and highlights the importance of stringent security measures to prevent such breaches.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Malicious Extensions
Vulnerability Exploited: Review Process Bypass
Motivation: Financial Gain

Incident : Remote Code Execution
Title: Windows KDC Proxy Service Remote Code Execution Vulnerability
Description: Microsoft's Windows Key Distribution Center (KDC) Proxy service experienced a significant remote code execution vulnerability, tracked as CVE-2024-43639, which could have allowed unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary code on affected servers. The flaw, due to an integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, was patched in November 2024. Had it been exploited, attackers could have gained full control over compromised systems, underlining the critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.
Date Publicly Disclosed: 2024-11-01
Date Resolved: 2024-11-01
Type: Remote Code Execution
Attack Vector: Unauthenticated remote attacker
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-43639

Incident : Malware Campaign
Title: GitVenom Campaign
Description: The GitVenom campaign has aggressively targeted gamers and crypto investors, utilizing GitHub as a platform for hosting malicious projects. With a multitude of fake repositories that contained harmful code, the campaign has deceived users with seemingly legitimate automation tools and crypto bots. The impact of GitVenom included credential theft, unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, and remote system control through backdoors. The damage extended to personal data compromise and financial losses for the affected users, while also tarnishing GitHub's reputation as a safe space for developers to share code.
Type: Malware Campaign
Attack Vector: Fake repositories, Malicious code
Motivation: Credential theft, Unauthorized cryptocurrency transactions, Remote system control

Incident : Malware Campaign
Title: GitVenom Malware Campaign
Description: The GitVenom malware campaign primarily targets GitHub users, particularly gamers and crypto investors, by masquerading as open-source projects. These fake repositories contained malicious scripts with the potential to download further nefarious components and execute them. The campaign, active for years with most infection attempts in Russia, Brazil, and Turkey, managed to compromise GitHub accounts, credentials, and crypto data, executing operations such as the theft of cryptocurrency and installing backdoors for remote access. Financial loss is substantial, reaching approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000 at the time of discovery, affecting users' financial assets and GitHub's reputation as a trusted development platform.
Type: Malware Campaign
Attack Vector: Malicious Scripts
Vulnerability Exploited: Trust in Open-Source Projects
Motivation: Financial Gain, Theft of Cryptocurrency

Incident : Privacy Breach
Title: Microsoft Recall AI Privacy Concerns
Description: Microsoft faced privacy concerns regarding their newly launched AI feature named Recall. Recall captures screenshots every five seconds to assist users in retrieving online activities such as recipes or documents. However, despite safety measures, it was discovered that Recall could capture sensitive information such as credit card numbers and Social Security numbers, even with the 'filter sensitive information' setting active. There were gaps identified when sensitive data was entered into a Notepad window or a loan application PDF within Microsoft Edge, which raised alarm within the privacy and security community, leading to significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users.
Type: Privacy Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Sensitive Information Capture

Incident : Data Breach
Title: Microsoft Recall AI Privacy and Security Incident
Description: In May, Microsoft introduced Recall, an AI that takes screenshots every five seconds for user convenience. However, concerns were raised about privacy and security, leading to delayed launch and modifications. Despite these changes, Tom's Hardware testing revealed the 'filter sensitive information' feature failed to prevent gathering sensitive data. Specifically, Recall captured credit card numbers, social security numbers, and other personal data while filling out a Notepad window and a loan application PDF, compromising users' financial information and privacy.
Date Detected: May 2023
Type: Data Breach
Vulnerability Exploited: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature

Incident : Credential Theft
Title: Chinese Threat Actors Employing Quad7 Botnet in Password-Spray Attacks
Description: Microsoft detected Chinese threat actors employing the Quad7 botnet, also known as CovertNetwork-1658 or xlogin, in sophisticated password-spray attacks aimed at stealing credentials. These attacks targeted SOHO devices and VPN appliances, exploiting vulnerabilities to gain unauthorized access to Microsoft 365 accounts. The botnet, which includes compromised TP-Link routers, relayed brute-force attacks and enabled further network exploitation. Affected sectors include government, law, defense, and NGOs in North America and Europe. The attackers, identified as Storm-0940, utilized low-volume password sprays to evade detection and maintained persistence within victims' networks for potential datapoints exfiltration.
Type: Credential Theft
Attack Vector: Password Spray Attacks, Brute-force Attacks
Vulnerability Exploited: SOHO devices, VPN appliances
Threat Actor: Storm-0940
Motivation: Credential Theft

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability
Title: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot Security Vulnerability
Description: Microsoft's AI-powered Copilot exposed to security vulnerabilities where a hacker could access sensitive information such as employee salaries by bypassing file reference protections. Attackers can also manipulate AI to provide their own bank details, glean insights from upcoming financial reports, and trick users into visiting phishing websites. The exploitation of post-compromise AI introduces new risks since it aids attackers in bypassing controls and extracting internal system prompts, leading to unauthorized data access and operations.
Type: AI-powered Software Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Bypass file reference protections, Manipulate AI to provide bank details, Glean insights from financial reports, Trick users into visiting phishing websites
Vulnerability Exploited: Bypassing file reference protections
Motivation: Access sensitive information, Manipulate AI for financial gain, Extract internal system prompts

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Title: Microsoft Azure Outage Due to DDoS Attack
Description: Microsoft experienced a widespread Azure outage impacting various services including Microsoft 365 products like Office and Outlook. This incident was confirmed by Microsoft as a cyberattack, specifically a distributed denial of service (DDoS), disrupting operations by overloading the infrastructure with excessive traffic. The attack lasted around eight hours and affected customers globally. Microsoft's swift identification and response to the attack minimized the direct impact on end-users, but the service interruption highlights the ever-present threat of cyberattacks and the importance of robust cybersecurity measures.
Type: Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS)
Attack Vector: Network overload

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing
Title: Stargazer Goblin Network Manipulates GitHub to Promote Malware
Description: A network named Stargazer Goblin manipulated GitHub to promote malware and phishing links, impacting the platform's integrity by boosting malicious repositories' popularity using ghost accounts. These activities aimed to deceive users seeking free software into downloading ransomware and info-stealer malware, compromising user data and potentially causing financial and reputational harm to both GitHub and its users. GitHub's response was to disable accounts in violation of their policies and continue efforts to detect and remove harmful content.
Type: Malware Distribution and Phishing
Attack Vector: Social Engineering, Malicious Links
Vulnerability Exploited: User Trust in Popular Repositories
Threat Actor: Stargazer Goblin Network
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft

Incident : Cyberattack
Title: Microsoft Cyberattack via CVE-2024-21412 Vulnerability
Description: Microsoft faced a cyberattack where the CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability in the Defender SmartScreen was exploited to deliver information stealers such as ACR Stealer, Lumma, and Meduza, affecting users in Spain, Thailand, and the US. Attackers utilized crafted links to bypass security features and install malware that stole data and targeted specific regions. Despite Microsoft releasing a patch for the vulnerability, the attack compromised personal and potentially sensitive information. Organizational cybersecurity defenses were challenged by the innovative methods used by the attackers, underscoring the criticality of awareness and proactive security measures.
Type: Cyberattack
Attack Vector: Crafted links to bypass security features
Vulnerability Exploited: CVE-2024-21412
Motivation: Data theft

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing
Title: GitHub 'Ghost' Accounts Manipulation
Description: GitHub, a prominent code-hosting platform, experienced manipulation of its pages through the use of 'ghost' accounts, as uncovered by Check Point researchers. The cybercriminal known as 'Stargazer Goblin' managed a network of approximately 3,000 fake accounts to promote malware and phishing links by artificially boosting the popularity of malicious repositories. This deceptive action not only jeopardized the integrity of GitHub's community tools but also posed risks to users by distributing malware and info-stealers, like the Atlantida Stealer, under the guise of legitimate software offerings. The platform's extensive user base heightened the potential damage, leading to GitHub's intervention to disable accounts that breach its Acceptable Use Policies.
Type: Malware Distribution, Phishing
Attack Vector: Fake Accounts, Repository Manipulation
Threat Actor: Stargazer Goblin
Motivation: Malware Distribution, Phishing

Incident : Security Breach
Title: Microsoft Exchange Server Breach
Description: In March 2021, Microsoft encountered a massive security breach that affected over 30,000 organizations in the U.S., ranging from businesses to government agencies. This attack was notably significant due to its broad impact and the exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software. The attackers were able to gain access to email accounts, and also install additional malware to facilitate long-term access to victim environments. Given the scale and the method of attackโexploiting software vulnerabilitiesโthe incident highlighted critical concerns regarding software security and the necessity for timely updates and patches. The breach not only compromised sensitive information but also eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures, pushing the company to swiftly address the vulnerabilities and enhance their security posture to prevent future incidents. The repercussions of the attack underscored the importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance in a landscape where threats are continuously evolving.
Date Detected: March 2021
Type: Security Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of software vulnerabilities
Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft Exchange Server

Incident : Data Exposure
Title: GitHub Plain Text Password Logging Incident
Description: GitHub discovered an issue resulting in credentials being recorded in plain text in internal logs, prompting some users to reset their passwords.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Internal Logging Error
Vulnerability Exploited: Internal Logging Mechanism

Incident : Data Leak
Title: Microsoft Windows 10 Source Code Leak
Description: A massive dump of Microsoft's proprietary internal builds for Windows 10 has been published online, along with the source codes for proprietary software. This is the largest leak affecting Windows products; the data in the dump were probably stolen from Microsoft computers in March. Microsoft's Shared Source Kit, which comprises the source code for the Microsoft PnP and base Windows 10 hardware drivers as well as storage drivers, USB and Wi-Fi stacks, and ARM-specific OneCore kernel code, has been released. Top-secret versions of Windows 10 and Windows Server 2016 that have never been made public are included in the dump.
Date Detected: March
Type: Data Leak

Incident : Data Exfiltration
Title: GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom Code Signing Certificates Exfiltration
Description: The GitHub Desktop for Mac and Atom programs, GitHub confirmed that threat actors exfiltrated encrypted code signing certificates. Customer data was not affected, the company claimed, because it was not kept in the affected repositories. According to the business, there is no proof that the threat actor was able to use or decrypt these certificates. According to the business, neither GitHub.com nor any of its other services have been affected by the security compromise.
Type: Data Exfiltration
Attack Vector: Exfiltration of Code Signing Certificates

Incident : Data Breach
Title: Microsoft Exchange Email System Breach
Description: A vulnerability in Microsoft's Exchange email system allowed threat actors with ties to China to steal about 60,000 emails from the US State Department. The compromised accounts were mostly used for diplomatic operations in the Indo-Pacific, and the hackers also obtained a list of all the department's correspondence. Approximately 60,000 unclassified emails were exfiltrated. No confidential systems were violated. The threat actors employed forged authentication credentials to access user email accounts via Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Forged Authentication Credentials
Vulnerability Exploited: Microsoft Exchange Email System
Threat Actor: Threat actors with ties to China
Motivation: Data Exfiltration

Incident : Data Leak
Title: Microsoft AI Research Division Data Leak
Description: The Microsoft AI research division unintentionally published 38TB of critical information while posting a container of open-source training data on GitHub.
Type: Data Leak
Attack Vector: Accidental Data Exposure
Vulnerability Exploited: Improper data management practices

Incident : Data Exposure
Title: Unsecured Database Exposure at Microsoft Careers Site
Description: The database driving m.careersatmicrosoft.com, handled by a mobile web development company, was accessible without authentication for a few weeks. The MongoDB instance was not write-protected, allowing potential alterations to the database and HTML code of job listing pages. The issue was secured after notification by Chris Vickery.
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Unsecured Database
Vulnerability Exploited: Lack of Authentication

Incident : DDoS Attack
Title: Microsoft Services Outage Due to DDoS Attacks
Description: Microsoft suffered severe outages for some of its services, including Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, and Azure's cloud computing infrastructure. The DDoS attacks were allegedly carried out by a group going by the name of Anonymous Sudan (also known as Storm-1359).
Type: DDoS Attack
Attack Vector: Layer 7 DDoS
Threat Actor: Anonymous Sudan, Storm-1359

Incident : Ransomware
Title: GitHub Ransomware Attack
Description: GitHub experienced a ransomware attack which included at least 392 GitHub repositories. Some users who fell victim to this hacker have admitted to using weak passwords for their GitHub, GitLab, and Bitbucket accounts. However, all evidence suggests that the hacker has scanned the entire internet for Git config files, extracted credentials, and then used these logins to access and ransom accounts at Git hosting services. It was found that hundreds of developers have had Git source code repositories wiped and replaced with a ransom demand.
Type: Ransomware
Attack Vector: Weak Passwords, Credential Scanning
Vulnerability Exploited: Weak Passwords
Motivation: Financial

Incident : Data Breach
Title: Microsoft Data Breach
Description: Microsoft experienced a massive data breach affecting anonymized data held on its customer support database. The data breach affected up to 250 million people as a result of the tech giant failing to implement proper protections. The information compromised included email addresses, IP addresses, and support case details.
Type: Data Breach

Incident : Data Exposure
Title: Microsoft Customer Data Exposure
Description: Sensitive information of Microsoft customers was exposed by a misconfigured Microsoft server accessible over the Internet in September 2022. The exposed information includes names, email addresses, email content, company name, and phone numbers, as well as files linked to business between affected customers and Microsoft or an authorized Microsoft partner.
Date Detected: September 2022
Type: Data Exposure
Attack Vector: Misconfigured Server
Vulnerability Exploited: Unintentional Misconfiguration

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability
Title: Follina Zero-Day Vulnerability
Description: A zero-day remote code execution vulnerability named 'Follina' in Microsoft Office discovered recently has the potential for code execution if a victim opens a malicious document in Word. The vulnerability abuses the ability of MSDT to load other assistants โwizardsโ in Windows, which in turn have the ability to execute arbitrary code from a remote location. It can also allow the attacker to view and edit files, install programs and create new user accounts to the limit of the compromised userโs access rights. The initial versions spotted in the wild required the target to open the malicious document in Word, but the recently discovered variant uses Rich Text Format (.RTF) works only if the user simply selects the file in Windows Explorer.
Type: Zero-Day Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Malicious Document, Rich Text Format (.RTF)
Vulnerability Exploited: Follina

Incident : Security Flaw
Title: Microsoft Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory Security Flaw
Description: Microsoft mitigated a security flaw affecting Azure Synapse and Azure Data Factory that could lead to any malicious actor acquiring the Azure Data Factory service certificate and accessing another tenant's Integration Runtimes to gain access to sensitive information. No evidence of misuse or malicious activity associated with the vulnerability in the wild was reported yet.
Type: Security Flaw
Attack Vector: Exploiting a vulnerability to acquire service certificate and access Integration Runtimes
Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Data Factory service certificate vulnerability
Motivation: Unauthorized access to sensitive information

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation
Title: Critical Vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation Service
Description: A critical vulnerability in Microsoft's Azure Automation service could have permitted unauthorized access to other Azure customer accounts. By exploiting the bug, the attacker could get full control over resources and data belonging to the targeted account, depending on the permissions assigned by the customer. Several companies including a telecommunications company, two car manufacturers, a banking conglomerate, and big four accounting firms, among others, the Israeli cloud infrastructure security company were targeted by exploiting this vulnerability. However, the issue was identified and was remediated in a patch pushed in December 2021.
Date Resolved: December 2021
Type: Vulnerability Exploitation
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Vulnerability Exploited: Azure Automation Service Vulnerability
Motivation: Unauthorized Access to Resources and Data

Incident : DDoS Attack
Title: GitHub DDoS Attack
Description: GitHub was hit by a major DDoS attack that made the website unavailable to many users for several hours. The attackers injected malicious JavaScript code into the pages of those websites that were responsible for the hijacking of their visitors to GitHub. GitHub investigated the incident and removed several repositories to secure its servers.
Type: DDoS Attack
Attack Vector: Malicious JavaScript Injection

Incident : Data Breach
Title: Github OAuth Token Theft Incident
Description: An unknown attacker is using stolen OAuth user tokens to download data from private repositories on Github. The attacker has already accessed and stolen data from dozens of victim organizations. Github immediately took action and started notifying all the impacted users and organizations about the security breach.
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Stolen OAuth Tokens
Vulnerability Exploited: OAuth Token Theft
Threat Actor: Unknown
Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : Data Breach
Title: Microsoft Azure DevOps Server Compromise
Description: Microsoft's Azure DevOps server was compromised in an attack by the Lapsus$ hacking group. The attackers leaked about a 9 GB zip archive containing the source code for Bing, Cortana, and other projects. Some of the compromised data contain emails and documentation that were clearly used internally by Microsoft engineers.
Type: Data Breach
Threat Actor: Lapsus$ hacking group
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Vulnerability.
How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents?
Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through SharePoint Server Vulnerability, Malicious repositories, Helpdesk Portals,Shared Directories, dMSA migration mechanism, Malicious Extensions, Fake repositories,Malicious code, Malicious Scripts in Fake Repositories, Basic Authentication, SOHO devices,VPN appliances, Ghost Accounts, Crafted links, Fake Accounts, Microsoft Exchange Server, Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com, Weak Passwords, Malicious Document, Azure Data Factory service certificate and Stolen OAuth Tokens.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident?

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325
Data Compromised: Confidential Data
Systems Affected: SharePoint Servers

Incident : Server Hack MIC709072225
Systems Affected: Microsoft SharePoint

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Systems Affected: Linux, macOS

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Systems Affected: Windows Explorer, macOS Quick Look, Email Client Preview Systems, File Indexing Services

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325
Systems Affected: Microsoft Edge, Chromium-based browsers

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Systems Affected: Windows Server 2025 environments
Operational Impact: Potential unauthorized access to domain controllers

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC846050725
Data Compromised: Sensitive intellectual property, Customer data, Internal decision-making processes
Systems Affected: Azure OpenAI, Other enterprise platforms
Brand Reputation Impact: Undermines user trust in Microsoftโs AI safety infrastructure

Incident : Vulnerability Disclosure MIC540040825
Systems Affected: Mark of the Web security feature, Windows File Explorer

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Data Compromised: Source code and secrets
Systems Affected: Public and private repositories, internal networks including GitHub's own systems

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Data Compromised: Install Action Tokens, Docker Credentials, npm Credentials, AWS Credentials
Systems Affected: GitHub Repositories

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Systems Affected: VSCode Marketplace

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525
Systems Affected: Windows KDC Proxy service

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials
Brand Reputation Impact: Tarnished GitHub's reputation

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030125
Financial Loss: Approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000
Data Compromised: GitHub accounts, Credentials, Crypto data
Systems Affected: GitHub
Brand Reputation Impact: Affected GitHub's reputation as a trusted development platform

Incident : Privacy Breach MIC001010225
Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers
Systems Affected: Recall AI feature
Brand Reputation Impact: Significant scrutiny and potential loss of trust from users
Identity Theft Risk: High
Payment Information Risk: High

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Data Compromised: credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Systems Affected: Microsoft 365 accounts, TP-Link routers

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724
Data Compromised: Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts
Systems Affected: AI-powered Copilot

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924
Systems Affected: Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365, Office, Outlook
Downtime: 8 hours
Operational Impact: Global service interruption

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Data Compromised: User Data
Systems Affected: GitHub Platform
Brand Reputation Impact: High
Identity Theft Risk: High

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524
Brand Reputation Impact: High

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information
Systems Affected: Microsoft Exchange Server
Operational Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures
Brand Reputation Impact: Eroded trust in Microsoft's security measures

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Data Compromised: Plain Text Passwords

Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123
Data Compromised: Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft Shared Source Kit

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Systems Affected: GitHub Desktop for Mac, Atom

Incident : Data Breach MIC01021023
Data Compromised: 60,000 unclassified emails
Systems Affected: Exchange Online (OWA), Outlook.com

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Data Compromised: Job listing data
Systems Affected: MongoDB database

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723
Systems Affected: Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, Azure's cloud computing infrastructure
Downtime: Severe outages

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Data Compromised: Source Code Repositories
Systems Affected: GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Data Compromised: email addresses, IP addresses, support case details

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Data Compromised: Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Systems Affected: Microsoft Office

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Data Compromised: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes
Systems Affected: Azure Synapse, Azure Data Factory

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Data Compromised: Full control over resources and data
Systems Affected: Azure Automation Service

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Data Compromised: Private Repository Data
Systems Affected: Github Private Repositories

Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322
Data Compromised: Source code for Bing, Source code for Cortana, Emails, Documentation
Systems Affected: Azure DevOps server
What is the average financial loss per incident?
Average Financial Loss: The average financial loss per incident is $0.12.
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Confidential Data, Sensitive intellectual property, Customer data, Internal decision-making processes, Source code and secrets, Credentials, Personal data, Credentials, GitHub accounts, Credentials, Crypto data, Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data, Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts, User Data, Personal and potentially sensitive information, Email accounts, sensitive information, Plain Text Passwords, Source Code, Internal Builds, Code Signing Certificates, Emails, Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, Job listing data, Source Code, email addresses, IP addresses, support case details, Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business, Sensitive information, Private Repository Data, Source code, Emails and Documentation.
Which entities were affected by each incident?

Incident : Server Hack MIC709072225
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Redmond, WA, USA
Size: Large

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Entity Type: Software Users
Industry: Software Development

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Entity Type: Organization

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC846050725
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Technology

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Redmond, WA, USA
Size: Large
Customers Affected: Handful of users

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Industry: ['Government', 'Law', 'Defense', 'NGOs']
Location: North America, Europe

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Entity Type: Platform
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: GitHub Users

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Spain, Thailand, US

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Entity Type: Technology Company
Industry: Software
Location: United States
Customers Affected: Over 30,000 organizations

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development Platform

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: None

Incident : Data Breach MIC01021023
Entity Type: Government
Industry: Public Sector
Location: United States

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: None

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Hundreds of developers

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: 250000000

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Technology
Customers Affected: More than 65,000 entities from 111 countries

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Entity Type: Software Company
Industry: Technology
Location: Redmond, Washington, USA
Size: Large

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Entity Type: Corporation
Industry: Technology
Location: Global
Size: Large

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Telecommunications Company
Industry: Telecommunications

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Banking Conglomerate
Industry: Finance

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Big Four Accounting Firm
Industry: Accounting

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Entity Type: Israeli Cloud Infrastructure Security Company
Industry: Cloud Security
Location: Israel

Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422
Entity Type: Company
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Many Users

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Entity Type: Organization
Industry: Software Development
Customers Affected: Dozens of victim organizations
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident?

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325
Remediation Measures: Patches Issued by Microsoft

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Containment Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versions, Avoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched
Remediation Measures: Upgrade to patched Git versions, Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Containment Measures: Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking
Remediation Measures: Deploy Behavioral Monitoring
Enhanced Monitoring: Monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325
Remediation Measures: Patching
Communication Strategy: Public Disclosure, User Notifications

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Remediation Measures: Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Remediation Measures: Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Remediation Measures: Implement stricter file and folder access controls

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525
Remediation Measures: Patch deployed

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Containment Measures: Disabled Ghost Accounts
Remediation Measures: Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Remediation Measures: Patch released

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524
Containment Measures: Disable fake accounts

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Remediation Measures: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Containment Measures: Password Reset
Communication Strategy: Public Statement

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Third Party Assistance: Wiz

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Third Party Assistance: Chris Vickery
Containment Measures: Secured the database

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Containment Measures: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Remediation Measures: Mitigated the security flaw

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC134612522
Remediation Measures: Patch released in December 2021

Incident : DDoS Attack GIT105924422
Containment Measures: Removed Several Repositories

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Containment Measures: Notifying impacted users and organizations
Communication Strategy: Notifying impacted users and organizations
How does the company involve third-party assistance in incident response?
Third-Party Assistance: The company involves third-party assistance in incident response through Wiz, Chris Vickery.
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach?

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325
Type of Data Compromised: Confidential Data
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: Possible

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration of intellectual property and proprietary source code

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
File Types Exposed: LNK Files, PDFs, Office Documents

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC846050725
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive intellectual property, Customer data, Internal decision-making processes
Data Exfiltration: True

Incident : Vulnerability GIT350040225
Type of Data Compromised: Source code and secrets
Data Exfiltration: Potential exfiltration

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Type of Data Compromised: Credentials

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Type of Data Compromised: Personal data, Credentials

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030125
Type of Data Compromised: GitHub accounts, Credentials, Crypto data

Incident : Privacy Breach MIC001010225
Type of Data Compromised: Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: Screenshots
Personally Identifiable Information: Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Type of Data Compromised: credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data
Sensitivity of Data: High
File Types Exposed: Notepad window, PDF
Personally Identifiable Information: credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data

Incident : AI-powered Software Vulnerability MIC001081724
Type of Data Compromised: Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Type of Data Compromised: User Data

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Type of Data Compromised: Personal and potentially sensitive information

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Type of Data Compromised: Email accounts, sensitive information

Incident : Data Exposure GIT432251223
Type of Data Compromised: Plain Text Passwords
Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Leak MIC2321251123
Type of Data Compromised: Source Code, Internal Builds
Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Exfiltration GIT205981023
Type of Data Compromised: Code Signing Certificates
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: True
Data Encryption: True

Incident : Data Breach MIC01021023
Type of Data Compromised: Emails
Number of Records Exposed: 60,000
Sensitivity of Data: Unclassified
Data Exfiltration: Yes

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Type of Data Compromised: Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications
Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Type of Data Compromised: Job listing data

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Type of Data Compromised: Source Code

Incident : Data Breach MIC234171222
Type of Data Compromised: email addresses, IP addresses, support case details
Number of Records Exposed: 250000000

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Type of Data Compromised: Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business
Number of Records Exposed: More than 65,000 entities
Sensitivity of Data: High
Personally Identifiable Information: True

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Type of Data Compromised: Sensitive information
Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Type of Data Compromised: Private Repository Data
Data Exfiltration: Yes

Incident : Data Breach MIC04123322
Type of Data Compromised: Source code, Emails, Documentation
Sensitivity of Data: High
Data Exfiltration: True
File Types Exposed: zip archive
What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration?
Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Patches Issued by Microsoft, Upgrade to patched Git versions, Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, Patching, Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Vulnerability addressed by GitHub team, Implement stricter file and folder access controls, Patch deployed, Continued Detection and Removal of Harmful Content, Patch released, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Mitigated the security flaw, Patch released in December 2021.
How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII)?
Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through were Upgrade to patched Git versions, Avoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched, Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Disabled Ghost Accounts, Disable fake accounts, Password Reset, Secured the database, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Removed Several Repositories and Notifying impacted users and organizations.
Ransomware Information
Was ransomware involved in any of the incidents?

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Ransom Demanded: ShibaCoin
Data Encryption: Files within a specific test folder
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Lessons Learned: Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Lessons Learned: Modern computing environmentsโ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Lessons Learned: The release of SharpSuccessor underscores the critical need for proactive security measures, as the tool transforms a complex privilege escalation technique into an easily deployable attack vector accessible to less sophisticated threat actors.

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC846050725
Lessons Learned: Need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Lessons Learned: Importance of stringent security measures in review processes.

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525
Lessons Learned: The critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.

Incident : Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) MIC001080924
Lessons Learned: The importance of robust cybersecurity measures and swift identification and response to minimize impact.

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Lessons Learned: Criticality of awareness and proactive security measures

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Lessons Learned: Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Lessons Learned: Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Recommendations: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories.

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Recommendations: Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325
Recommendations: Update Microsoft Edge to version 138.0.3351.65 or later immediately

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Recommendations: Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only

Incident : Data Breach GIT344032125
Recommendations: Implement stricter file and folder access controls

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Recommendations: Timely updates and patches to software
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning.Modern computing environmentsโ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing.The release of SharpSuccessor underscores the critical need for proactive security measures, as the tool transforms a complex privilege escalation technique into an easily deployable attack vector accessible to less sophisticated threat actors.Need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignmentImportance of stringent security measures in review processes.The critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security.The importance of robust cybersecurity measures and swift identification and response to minimize impact.Criticality of awareness and proactive security measuresImportance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilanceDifficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.
What recommendations has the company implemented to improve cybersecurity?
Implemented Recommendations: The company has implemented the following recommendations to improve cybersecurity: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories.Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processesUpdate Microsoft Edge to version 138.0.3351.65 or later immediatelyImplement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators onlyImplement stricter file and folder access controlsTimely updates and patches to software.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident?

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Source: DataDog researchers

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Source: CYFIRMA

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325
Source: Microsoft Security Update
Date Accessed: 2025-07-01

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: BleepingComputer

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: Check Point Research

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: DFN-CERT

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: RedTeam Pentesting

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: CrowdStrike

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: Synacktiv

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: SySS GmbH

Incident : Vulnerability Patch MIC902061025
Source: Google Project Zero

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Source: Tom's Hardware

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Source: Microsoft

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524
Source: Check Point Research

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Source: Wiz

Incident : DDoS Attack MIC20599723
Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Source: SOCRadar
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: BloombergUrl: https://www.bloomberg.com, and Source: Security Researcher Matt Muir, and Source: DataDog researchers, and Source: CYFIRMA, and Source: Microsoft Security UpdateDate Accessed: 2025-07-01, and Source: BleepingComputer, and Source: Check Point Research, and Source: DFN-CERT, and Source: RedTeam Pentesting, and Source: CrowdStrike, and Source: Synacktiv, and Source: SySS GmbH, and Source: Google Project Zero, and Source: Tom's Hardware, and Source: Microsoft, and Source: Check Point Research, and Source: Wiz, and Source: Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults, and Source: SOCRadar.
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the investigation for each incident?

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Investigation Status: No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through were Public Disclosure, User Notifications, Public Statement and Notifying impacted users and organizations.
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident?

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325
Entry Point: SharePoint Server Vulnerability
High Value Targets: Government Agencies, Corporations, Educational Institutions
Data Sold on Dark Web: Government Agencies, Corporations, Educational Institutions

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Entry Point: Malicious repositories

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Entry Point: ['Helpdesk Portals', 'Shared Directories']

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Entry Point: dMSA migration mechanism
High Value Targets: Domain Administrator accounts
Data Sold on Dark Web: Domain Administrator accounts

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Entry Point: Malicious Extensions

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030225
Entry Point: ['Fake repositories', 'Malicious code']

Incident : Malware Campaign GIT000030125
Entry Point: Malicious Scripts in Fake Repositories
Backdoors Established: Installed backdoors for remote access
High Value Targets: Gamers, Crypto Investors
Data Sold on Dark Web: Gamers, Crypto Investors

Incident : Credential Theft MIC001110524
Entry Point: ['SOHO devices', 'VPN appliances']
High Value Targets: Microsoft 365 accounts
Data Sold on Dark Web: Microsoft 365 accounts

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Entry Point: Ghost Accounts
High Value Targets: GitHub Users
Data Sold on Dark Web: GitHub Users

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Entry Point: Crafted links

Incident : Malware Distribution, Phishing GIT000072524
Entry Point: Fake Accounts

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Entry Point: Microsoft Exchange Server
Backdoors Established: Installation of additional malware

Incident : Data Breach MIC01021023
Entry Point: Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Entry Point: Weak Passwords

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Entry Point: Malicious Document

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Entry Point: Azure Data Factory service certificate
High Value Targets: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes
Data Sold on Dark Web: Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes

Incident : Data Breach GIT102016422
Entry Point: Stolen OAuth Tokens
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident?

Incident : Cyber Attack MIC529072325
Root Causes: Vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server
Corrective Actions: Issuing Patches

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation GIT817071625
Root Causes: Mismatch in Gitโs handling of configuration values and control characters
Corrective Actions: Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning

Incident : Zero-Click Attack MIC607071425
Root Causes: Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems
Corrective Actions: Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC927070325
Root Causes: Zero-Day Vulnerability Exploitation
Corrective Actions: Apply Security Patch

Incident : Privilege Escalation MIC632052625
Root Causes: Vulnerability in Windows Server 2025โs dMSA feature
Corrective Actions: Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only

Incident : Vulnerability Exploitation MIC846050725
Root Causes: Failure to normalize or parse Unicode emoji variation selectors

Incident : Ransomware MIC613032125
Root Causes: Gaps in Microsoft's review system

Incident : Remote Code Execution MIC412030525
Root Causes: Integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling

Incident : Data Breach MIC000121524
Root Causes: Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature

Incident : Malware Distribution and Phishing GIT001072724
Root Causes: Trust in Popular Repositories
Corrective Actions: Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal

Incident : Cyberattack MIC000072624
Root Causes: CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability
Corrective Actions: Patch released

Incident : Security Breach MIC311050724
Root Causes: Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software
Corrective Actions: Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture

Incident : Data Leak MIC33924923
Root Causes: Improper data management practices

Incident : Data Exposure MIC41021823
Root Causes: Lack of authentication and write-protection

Incident : Ransomware GIT02020323
Root Causes: Weak Passwords

Incident : Data Exposure MIC01121122
Root Causes: Unintentional Misconfiguration

Incident : Zero-Day Vulnerability MIC14326622
Root Causes: Vulnerability in MSDT
Corrective Actions: Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol

Incident : Security Flaw MIC113613522
Root Causes: Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate
Corrective Actions: Mitigated the security flaw
What is the company's process for conducting post-incident analysis?
Post-Incident Analysis Process: The company's process for conducting post-incident analysis is described as Monitoring for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, Monitor preview-related processes like explorer.exe, searchindexer.exe, and quicklookd, Wiz, Chris Vickery.
What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis?
Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Issuing Patches, Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, Apply Security Patch, Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Patch released, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Mitigated the security flaw.
Additional Questions
General Information
What was the amount of the last ransom demanded?
Last Ransom Demanded: The amount of the last ransom demanded was ShibaCoin.
Who was the attacking group in the last incident?
Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident were an Linen Typhoon, Violet Typhoon, Storm-2603, Single Bad Actor, Unknown, EncryptHub (SkorikARI), Chinese-affiliated hacking group, Storm-0940, Stargazer Goblin Network, Stargazer Goblin, Threat actors with ties to China, Anonymous Sudan, Storm-1359, Unknown and Lapsus$ hacking group.
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-07-01.
What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed?
Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-07-01.
What was the most recent incident resolved?
Most Recent Incident Resolved: The most recent incident resolved was on 2024-11-01.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the highest financial loss from an incident?
Highest Financial Loss: The highest financial loss from an incident was Approximately 5 BTC, valued at around $485,000.
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Confidential Data, Sensitive intellectual property, Customer data, Internal decision-making processes, Source code and secrets, Install Action Tokens, Docker Credentials, npm Credentials, AWS Credentials, Personal data, Credentials, GitHub accounts, Credentials, Crypto data, Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data, Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts, User Data, Personal and potentially sensitive information, Email accounts, sensitive information, Plain Text Passwords, Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, 60,000 unclassified emails, Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, Job listing data, Source Code Repositories, email addresses, IP addresses, support case details, Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, Full control over resources and data, Private Repository Data, Source code for Bing, Source code for Cortana, Emails and Documentation.
What was the most significant system affected in an incident?
Most Significant System Affected: The most significant system affected in an incident were SharePoint Servers and Microsoft SharePoint and Linux, macOS and Windows Explorer, macOS Quick Look, Email Client Preview Systems, File Indexing Services and Microsoft Edge, Chromium-based browsers and Windows Server 2025 environments and Azure OpenAI, Other enterprise platforms and Mark of the Web security feature, Windows File Explorer and Public and private repositories, internal networks including GitHub's own systems and GitHub Repositories and VSCode Marketplace and Windows KDC Proxy service and GitHub and Microsoft 365 and Recall AI feature and Microsoft 365 accounts, TP-Link routers and AI-powered Copilot and Microsoft Azure, Microsoft 365, Office, Outlook and GitHub Platform and Microsoft Exchange Server and GitHub Desktop for Mac, Atom and Exchange Online (OWA), Outlook.com and MongoDB database and Outlook email, OneDrive file-sharing apps, Azure's cloud computing infrastructure and GitHub, GitLab, Bitbucket and Microsoft Office and Azure Synapse, Azure Data Factory and Azure Automation Service and GitHub Servers and Github Private Repositories and Azure DevOps server.
Response to the Incidents
What third-party assistance was involved in the most recent incident?
Third-Party Assistance in Most Recent Incident: The third-party assistance involved in the most recent incident was Wiz, Chris Vickery.
What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident?
Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident were Upgrade to patched Git versions, Avoid using GitHub Desktop for macOS until patched, Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Disabled Ghost Accounts, Disable fake accounts, Password Reset, Secured the database, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Removed Several Repositories and Notifying impacted users and organizations.
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Confidential Data, Sensitive intellectual property, Customer data, Internal decision-making processes, Source code and secrets, Install Action Tokens, Docker Credentials, npm Credentials, AWS Credentials, Personal data, Credentials, GitHub accounts, Credentials, Crypto data, Credit card numbers, Social Security numbers, credit card numbers, social security numbers, other personal data, Employee salaries, Financial reports, Internal system prompts, User Data, Personal and potentially sensitive information, Email accounts, sensitive information, Plain Text Passwords, Windows 10 internal builds, Microsoft Shared Source Kit, 60,000 unclassified emails, Secrets, Private keys, Passwords, Internal Microsoft Teams communications, Job listing data, Source Code Repositories, email addresses, IP addresses, support case details, Names, Email Addresses, Email Content, Company Name, Phone Numbers, Files linked to business, Sensitive information in Integration Runtimes, Full control over resources and data, Private Repository Data, Source code for Bing, Source code for Cortana, Emails and Documentation.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 125.2K.
Ransomware Information
What was the highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident?
Highest Ransom Demanded: The highest ransom demanded in a ransomware incident was ShibaCoin.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Ensure timely updates to software, monitor for suspicious git operations, and audit repository contents before cloning., Modern computing environmentsโ emphasis on user convenience creates silent execution paths that require no interaction, fundamentally challenging traditional security assumptions about file-based attacks and necessitating a reevaluation of how systems handle passive file processing., The release of SharpSuccessor underscores the critical need for proactive security measures, as the tool transforms a complex privilege escalation technique into an easily deployable attack vector accessible to less sophisticated threat actors., Need for more robust Unicode handling and unified guardrail-LM dataset alignment, Importance of stringent security measures in review processes., The critical importance of quick patch deployment in enterprise security., The importance of robust cybersecurity measures and swift identification and response to minimize impact., Criticality of awareness and proactive security measures, Importance of robust cybersecurity defenses and the need for constant vigilance, Difficulty in tracking SAS tokens due to lack of centralized management in Azure interface.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit .gitmodules file contents before cloning untrusted repositories., Disable preview panes in Windows Explorer and Quick Look on macOS, Block outbound SMB traffic (TCP 445) to untrusted networks, Enforce macro blocking through Group Policy, Deploy behavioral monitoring to detect unusual network activity from preview-related processes, Update Microsoft Edge to version 138.0.3351.65 or later immediately, Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Implement stricter file and folder access controls, Timely updates and patches to software.
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Bloomberg, Security Researcher Matt Muir, DataDog researchers, CYFIRMA, Microsoft Security Update, BleepingComputer, Check Point Research, DFN-CERT, RedTeam Pentesting, CrowdStrike, Synacktiv, SySS GmbH, Google Project Zero, Tom's Hardware, Microsoft, Check Point Research, Wiz, Microsoft Response to Layer 7 Distributed Denial of Service (DDoS) assaults and SOCRadar.
What is the most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices?
Most Recent URL for Additional Resources: The most recent URL for additional resources on cybersecurity best practices is https://www.bloomberg.com .
Investigation Status
What is the current status of the most recent investigation?
Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is No evidence of misuse or malicious activity reported.
Initial Access Broker
What was the most recent entry point used by an initial access broker?
Most Recent Entry Point: The most recent entry point used by an initial access broker were an VPN appliances, SharePoint Server Vulnerability, Malicious Extensions, Outlook Web Access in Exchange Online (OWA) and Outlook.com, Helpdesk Portals, Malicious Scripts in Fake Repositories, Ghost Accounts, Malicious code, Basic Authentication, Fake repositories, Malicious Document, Microsoft Exchange Server, Azure Data Factory service certificate, Weak Passwords, dMSA migration mechanism, Shared Directories, Malicious repositories, Crafted links, Stolen OAuth Tokens, SOHO devices and Fake Accounts.
Post-Incident Analysis
What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis?
Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Vulnerability in Microsoft SharePoint Server, Mismatch in Gitโs handling of configuration values and control characters, Exploitation of passive file preview and indexing behaviors in modern operating systems, Zero-Day Vulnerability Exploitation, Vulnerability in Windows Server 2025โs dMSA feature, Failure to normalize or parse Unicode emoji variation selectors, Gaps in Microsoft's review system, Integer overflow from missing length checks on Kerberos response handling, Insufficient data filtering in AI screenshot feature, Trust in Popular Repositories, CVE-2024-21412 vulnerability, Exploitation of vulnerabilities within Microsoft's Exchange Server software, Improper data management practices, Lack of authentication and write-protection, Weak Passwords, Unintentional Misconfiguration, Vulnerability in MSDT, Vulnerability in Azure Data Factory service certificate.
What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis?
Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Issuing Patches, Upgrade to patched Git versions, monitor for suspicious git clone โrecursive executions, audit repository contents before cloning, Disable Preview Panes, Block Outbound SMB Traffic, Enforce Macro Blocking, Deploy Behavioral Monitoring, Apply Security Patch, Implement Akamaiโs detection script Get-BadSuccessorOUPermissions.ps, Restrict dMSA creation permissions to trusted administrators only, Disable Ghost Accounts, Continuous Detection and Removal, Patch released, Addressed vulnerabilities and enhanced security posture, Disabling the MSDT URL Protocol, Mitigated the security flaw.
What Do We Measure?
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
