Comparison Overview

Asurion

VS

Neobpo

Asurion

1101 Church St, Nashville, 37203, US
Last Update: 2026-03-25
Between 750 and 799

As the world’s leading tech care company, Asurion eliminates the fears and frustrations associated with technology, to ensure our 300 million customers get the most out of their devices, appliances and connections. We provide insurance, repair, replacement, installation and 24/7 support for everything from cellphones to laptops and household appliances. Our experts are available online, on the phone, at one of our more than 800 stores, or can even come to you.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 16,725
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Neobpo

Rua Pais Leme, 14, São Paulo, SP, BR, 05424-010
Last Update: 2026-03-27
Between 750 and 799

Somos especializados em integrar tecnologia com inteligência humana, oferecendo soluções digitais que promovem transformação e eficiência operacional. Nosso foco é gerar valor por meio de resultados reais, utilizando inteligência digital para atender às necessidades específicas de cada cliente. Mergulhamos nos desafios de empresas que buscam inovação, modernização e escalabilidade, oferecendo soluções seguras e personalizadas para impulsionar seu crescimento. Adotamos uma abordagem consultiva ao longo de toda a jornada, identificando oportunidades estratégicas desde o primeiro contato, proporcionando soluções sob medida que combinam dados, automação e atendimento dedicado. O impacto que geramos vai além da entrega de resultados. Transformamos a forma como nossos clientes operam, melhorando sua produtividade, segurança e escalabilidade, garantindo um crescimento sustentável e criando valor mensurável para seus negócios.

NAICS: 5415
NAICS Definition: Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees: 10,245
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asurion.jpeg
Asurion
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neohypeco.jpeg
Neobpo
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Asurion
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Neobpo
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Asurion in 2026.

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Neobpo in 2026.

Incident History — Asurion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Asurion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Neobpo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Neobpo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/asurion.jpeg
Asurion
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2019
Type:Breach
Motivation: Financial
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/neohypeco.jpeg
Neobpo
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Neobpo company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Asurion company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Asurion company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas Neobpo company has not reported any.

In the current year, Neobpo company and Asurion company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Neobpo company nor Asurion company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Asurion company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Neobpo company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Neobpo company nor Asurion company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Asurion company nor Neobpo company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Asurion company nor Neobpo company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Asurion company employs more people globally than Neobpo company, reflecting its scale as a IT Services and IT Consulting.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Asurion nor Neobpo holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A flaw has been found in wandb OpenUI up to 1.0. This affects the function create_share/get_share of the file backend/openui/server.py of the component HTMLAnnotator Component. Executing a manipulation of the argument ID can lead to HTML injection. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

A vulnerability was detected in QDOCS Smart School Management System up to 7.2. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /admin/enquiry of the component Admission Enquiry Module. Performing a manipulation of the argument Note results in cross site scripting. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 4.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The Ultimate Member plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.2. This is due to the '{usermeta:password_reset_link}' template tag being processed within post content via the '[um_loggedin]' shortcode, which generates a valid password reset token for the currently logged-in user viewing the page. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to craft a malicious pending post that, when previewed by an Administrator, generates a password reset token for the Administrator and exfiltrates it to an attacker-controlled server, leading to full account takeover.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

LibJWT is a C JSON Web Token Library. Starting in version 3.0.0 and prior to version 3.3.0, the JWK parsing for RSA-PSS did not protect against a NULL value when expecting to parse JSON string values. A specially crafted JWK file could exploit this behavior by using integers in places where the code expected a string. This was fixed in v3.3.0. A workaround is available. Users importing keys through a JWK file should not do so from untrusted sources. Use the `jwk2key` tool to check for validity of a JWK file. Likewise, if possible, do not use JWK files with RSA-PSS keys.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:L/VI:L/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Locutus brings stdlibs of other programming languages to JavaScript for educational purposes. Starting in version 2.0.39 and prior to version 3.0.25, a prototype pollution vulnerability exists in the `parse_str` function of the npm package locutus. An attacker can pollute `Object.prototype` by overriding `RegExp.prototype.test` and then passing a crafted query string to `parse_str`, bypassing the prototype pollution guard. This vulnerability stems from an incomplete fix for CVE-2026-25521. The CVE-2026-25521 patch replaced the `String.prototype.includes()`-based guard with a `RegExp.prototype.test()`-based guard. However, `RegExp.prototype.test` is itself a writable prototype method that can be overridden, making the new guard bypassable in the same way as the original — trading one hijackable built-in for another. Version 3.0.25 contains an updated fix.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X