Comparison Overview

Army National Guard

VS

US Army

Army National Guard

111 S George Mason Dr, Arlington, 22204, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 700 and 749

Welcome to the Army National Guard's page on LinkedIn.  The Army National Guard, also known as the National Guard, is one component of The Army (which consists of the Active Army, the Army National Guard, and the Army Reserve). National Guard Soldiers serve both community and country. Our versatility enables us to respond to domestic emergencies, overseas combat missions, counterdrug efforts, reconstruction missions and more. If you are interested in learning more about the career opportunities and educational benefits made possible through service in the National Guard, visit www.NATIONALGUARD.com or talk with our team today at https://bit.ly/2uXk12R. For those seeking official information and news tied to the Army National Guard, visit www.ng.mil. 

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 58,739
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

US Army

1500 Army Navy Dr, Arlington, US
Last Update: 2026-03-31
Between 800 and 849

Welcome to the official U.S. Army LinkedIn page. The U.S. Army’s mission is to fight and win our Nation’s wars by providing prompt, sustained land dominance across the full range of military operations and spectrum of conflict in support of combatant commanders. If you're looking for news about the U.S. Army, visit http://www.army.mil/ For information about U.S. Army career opportunities https://www.goarmy.com/?iom=BNL7-22-0029_N_OSOC_OCPA_LI_ocpagen_xx_xx.

NAICS: 92811
NAICS Definition: National Security
Employees: 355,851
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/army-national-guard.jpeg
Army National Guard
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Army National Guard
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
US Army
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Army National Guard in 2026.

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for US Army in 2026.

Incident History — Army National Guard (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Army National Guard cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — US Army (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Army cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/army-national-guard.jpeg
Army National Guard
Incidents

Date Detected: 12/2024
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploiting vulnerabilities in Cisco's routers and similar hardware
Motivation: Disrupt networks, Steal key intelligence, Prepare for potential conflict over Taiwan
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/us-army.jpeg
US Army
Incidents

Date Detected: 08/2018
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 07/2018
Type:Vulnerability
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Basic Security Vulnerability
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 06/2015
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Website Hacking
Motivation: Political
Blog: Blog

FAQ

US Army company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Army National Guard company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

US Army company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Army National Guard company.

In the current year, US Army company and Army National Guard company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither US Army company nor Army National Guard company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Both US Army company and Army National Guard company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

US Army company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Army National Guard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

US Army company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Army National Guard company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

US Army company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Army National Guard company.

US Army company employs more people globally than Army National Guard company, reflecting its scale as a Armed Forces.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Army National Guard nor US Army holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda 4G03 Pro up to 1.0/1.1/04.03.01.53/192.168.0.1. Affected by this vulnerability is an unknown functionality of the file /bin/httpd. The manipulation results in improper access controls. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Wikipedia 12.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to crash the application by submitting oversized input through the search functionality. Attackers can paste a large buffer of repeated characters into the search bar to trigger an application crash.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Nodcms contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers to perform unauthorized administrative actions by crafting malicious forms. Attackers can trick authenticated administrators into submitting requests to admin/user_manipulate and admin/settings/generall endpoints to create users or modify application settings without explicit consent.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

10-Strike LANState 8.8 contains a local buffer overflow vulnerability in structured exception handling that allows local attackers to execute arbitrary code by crafting malicious LSM map files. Attackers can create a specially formatted LSM file with a payload in the ObjCaption parameter that overflows the buffer, overwrites the SEH chain, and executes shellcode when the file is opened in the application.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

NICO-FTP 3.0.1.19 contains a structured exception handler buffer overflow vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code by sending crafted FTP commands. Attackers can connect to the FTP service and send oversized data in response handlers to overwrite SEH pointers and redirect execution to injected shellcode.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X