Comparison Overview

aramco

VS

McDermott International, Ltd

aramco

P.O. Box 5000, Dhahran, SA, 31311
Last Update: 2026-04-01
View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.aramco.com

We’re a leading producer of the energy and chemicals that drive global commerce and enhance the daily lives of people around the globe by continuing delivering an uninterrupted supply of energy to the world. Our resilience and agility has built one of the world’s largest integrated energy and chemicals companies. And we are part of the global effort toward building a low carbon economy. Our horizon has never been clearer.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 167,145
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
View Profile

McDermott International, Ltd

915 N. Eldridge Parkway, Houston, 77079, US
Last Update: 2026-04-01
Between 750 and 799
http://www.mcdermott.com/

McDermott is a premier provider of engineering and construction solutions to the energy industry. Our customers trust our technology-driven approach—engineered to responsibly harness and transform global energy resources into the products the world needs for now and what’s next. From concept to commissioning, we are creating and delivering the building blocks of the energy transition. Our innovative expertise and capabilities advance the next generation of global energy infrastructure—empowering a brighter, more sustainable future for us all. Operating in over 54 countries, our locally focused and globally integrated resources include more than 30,000 employees, a diversified fleet of specialty marine construction vessels and fabrication facilities around the world. To learn more, visit www.mcdermott.com.

NAICS: 211
NAICS Definition: Oil and Gas Extraction
Employees: 22,433
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdermott-international-inc-.jpeg
McDermott International, Ltd
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
aramco
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
McDermott International, Ltd
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for aramco in 2026.

Incidents vs Oil and Gas Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for McDermott International, Ltd in 2026.

Incident History — aramco (X = Date, Y = Severity)

aramco cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — McDermott International, Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)

McDermott International, Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/aramco.jpeg
aramco
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2021
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: Financial Gain
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 8/2017
Type:Cyber Attack
Attack Vector: Malware
Motivation: Cyber warfare, industrial espionage
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/mcdermott-international-inc-.jpeg
McDermott International, Ltd
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

aramco company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to McDermott International, Ltd company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

aramco company has historically faced a number of disclosed cyber incidents, whereas McDermott International, Ltd company has not reported any.

In the current year, McDermott International, Ltd company and aramco company have not reported any cyber incidents.

aramco company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while McDermott International, Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither McDermott International, Ltd company nor aramco company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

aramco company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while McDermott International, Ltd company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither aramco company nor McDermott International, Ltd company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither aramco company nor McDermott International, Ltd company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

aramco company employs more people globally than McDermott International, Ltd company, reflecting its scale as a Oil and Gas.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds HIPAA certification.

Neither aramco nor McDermott International, Ltd holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

nimiq/core-rs-albatross is a Rust implementation of the Nimiq Proof-of-Stake protocol based on the Albatross consensus algorithm. Prior to version 1.3.0, two peer-facing consensus request handlers assume that the history index is always available and call blockchain.history_store.history_index().unwrap() directly. That assumption is false by construction. HistoryStoreProxy::history_index() explicitly returns None for the valid HistoryStoreProxy::WithoutIndex state. when a full node is syncing or otherwise running without the history index, a remote peer can send RequestTransactionsProof or RequestTransactionReceiptsByAddress and trigger an Option::unwrap() panic on the request path. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.0.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 1.5.95, FileTools.download_file() in praisonaiagents validates the destination path but performs no validation on the url parameter, passing it directly to httpx.stream() with follow_redirects=True. An attacker who controls the URL can reach any host accessible from the server including cloud metadata services and internal network services. This issue has been patched in version 1.5.95.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, OAuthManager.validate_token() returns True for any token not found in its internal store, which is empty by default. Any HTTP request to the MCP server with an arbitrary Bearer token is treated as authenticated, granting full access to all registered tools and agent capabilities. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.97, the PraisonAI Gateway server accepts WebSocket connections at /ws and serves agent topology at /info with no authentication. Any network client can connect, enumerate registered agents, and send arbitrary messages to agents and their tool sets. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.97.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

PraisonAI is a multi-agent teams system. Prior to version 4.5.90, MCPToolIndex.search_tools() compiles a caller-supplied string directly as a Python regular expression with no validation, sanitization, or timeout. A crafted regex causes catastrophic backtracking in the re engine, blocking the Python thread for hundreds of seconds and causing a complete service outage. This issue has been patched in version 4.5.90.

Published
Date
2026-04-03
Updated
Date
2026-04-03
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
References